This paper examines how firms can identify the most productive and profitable combination of inputs in a production process through long-term cost analysis. Using DuPont as a case study, it discusses how technology adoption and inventory streamlining can increase return on investment (ROI) by boosting turnover without proportionally raising costs. The paper also introduces the Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) framework — a Six Sigma-based risk management approach — as a complementary method for evaluating process inputs by weighing the costs of defects against the risks of process changes such as inventory reduction.
Long-term cost analysis is essential when evaluating the productivity of inputs in a production process. Determining the most profitable combination of inputs requires looking beyond immediate costs and considering how different choices affect efficiency, output, and profitability over time. Production functions and their associated cost structures must be examined carefully to identify where gains can be made without proportionally increasing expenditure.
Evaluating the potential profit of any enterprise means evaluating the production's turnover rate. By increasing production without increasing costs, a greater profit is generated through increased sales. If this is not immediately achievable, the next priority becomes reducing costs elsewhere in the process.
On first consideration, it may seem less profitable to introduce a new technology system to a company and to train existing workers in that system — at, for example, a manufacturing plant at DuPont, a chemical company. However, by deploying technology strategically, workflow can be streamlined, fewer employees may be necessary on the assembly line, and more products can be produced at a lower cost to the company and, potentially, to the consumer.
Of course, technology can become outdated, and this must also be taken into consideration when evaluating costs as well as the immediate productivity of any process. Technological change presents both an opportunity and a risk: the gains from automation and process improvement must be weighed against the costs of obsolescence and retraining over time.
If increasing output without raising costs is not feasible, the next option is reducing working capital — the sum of inventories, accounts receivable, and cash. As Worstell (2003) explains: "Before the 1980s, manufacturers maintained large inventories of production inputs…but to increase turnover, thereby increasing ROI, meant reducing inventories" (p. 73).
By increasing the rate of turnover, streamlining inventories, and reducing the number of hands needed in the production process, DuPont was able to streamline its overall operations through the 1990s. This occurred despite some concern that reducing inventories might make the company less responsive to consumer demand. The return on investment (ROI) gains from leaner inventory management ultimately justified the transition, illustrating how a careful reconfiguration of inputs can yield measurable long-term profitability.
"COPQ framework quantifies risk of process change"
By combining ROI analysis with COPQ risk assessment, firms can make more informed decisions about which input combinations will yield the greatest long-term profitability. The DuPont example demonstrates that carefully evaluating both the costs and risks associated with technology adoption and inventory management can lead to significant operational improvements, even when short-term trade-offs are involved.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.