Robert Francis "Fair and Unfair": Balance in Nature and Society
This essay offers a close reading of Robert Francis's two-stanza poem "Fair and Unfair," exploring how Francis uses structure, form, and poetic devices to mirror the very imbalance he laments between nature and society. The analysis examines the poem's modified terza rima rhyme scheme, its caesura, and its use of assonance and anaphora to emphasize the unequal distribution of fairness in the world. The essay also situates Francis within the tradition of American nature poets such as Robert Frost, arguing that Francis, like Frost, believed nature could provide moral guidance to those willing to observe it carefully.
- Introduction: Francis and the Tradition of Nature Poetry: Francis's place among American nature poets
- Narrator, Perspective, and Theme: First-person omniscient voice addresses imbalance
- Stanza-by-Stanza Analysis: Nature versus society across two stanzas
- Structure, Form, and the Terza Rima Adaptation: Modified rhyme scheme enacts thematic balance
- Poetic Devices: Assonance and Anaphora: Sound devices reinforce the fairness theme
- Imagery and Simplicity of Style: Direct imagery avoids obscuring the message
- Conclusion: Balance Through Structure and Message: Form and content together achieve poetic balance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay consistently connects formal poetic elements — rhyme scheme, stanza count, caesura — to the poem's thematic argument about balance, showing rather than merely asserting the relationship between form and content.
- The analysis moves methodically through the poem, addressing perspective, tone, structure, and individual devices in a logical sequence that builds a cumulative interpretation.
- The paper situates Francis within a recognizable literary tradition (Frost, Dickinson, Thoreau), giving the reader context without letting that context overshadow the close reading.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates integrated close reading: it quotes the poem precisely, names specific literary devices (anaphora, assonance, terza rima, caesura), and immediately explains how each device serves the poem's meaning. This technique — quote, identify, interpret — is the foundation of strong literary analysis at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by placing Francis in literary context, then establishes narrative voice and theme. It moves through the poem stanza by stanza before pivoting to formal analysis (rhyme scheme, line count, caesura). Two subsequent paragraphs treat individual sound devices, followed by a discussion of imagery and diction. The conclusion synthesizes form and message, returning to the Frost comparison introduced in the opening.
Introduction: Francis and the Tradition of Nature Poetry
Robert Francis was an American poet whose work is often compared to that of Robert Frost, his mentor, as well as to Emily Dickinson and Henry David Thoreau. Although Francis's work has frequently been neglected — he is "often excluded from major anthologies of American poetry" — those who have read it have praised both the poet and his writing. In "Fair and Unfair," Francis comments on balance in nature and in society. Like Frost, Francis contends that nature has the ability to provide guidance, if only humanity is wise enough to observe it. In "Fair and Unfair," Francis achieves balance both through what is written and through how it is written.
Narrator, Perspective, and Theme
The poem is told from a first-person, omniscient perspective, and the narrator appears to be addressing the general public. It seems as though the narrator seeks to bring attention to how nature has become disregarded as society and civilization grow and develop. As narrator, Francis appears to want to inform the reader of the imbalance between fair and unfair in the world. By writing "Had we the wit," Francis contends that people cannot perceive this imbalance because they lack wisdom, and thus cannot restore balance to the world. In a sense, Francis is asserting his own enlightenment about the role of nature in the formation of society, and he wishes to share what he has observed so that others may become equally enlightened.
Stanza-by-Stanza Analysis
Francis's poem begins through the juxtaposition of nature and society. In the first stanza, the tone is sorrowful as Francis points out the imbalance between the two. He writes, "The beautiful is fair. The just is fair," thereby establishing that beauty — or nature — and what is just — or society — are each considered unbiased. However, the presence of beauty and justice is uneven and often difficult to discern. Francis contends that beauty is "commonplace…[and] everywhere," whereas justice is "rare…[and] scarcely anywhere."
As Francis continues his analysis of fairness, he comments on humanity's inability to find balance between nature and society. In the second stanza, the tone shifts slightly and becomes reservedly hopeful. Francis writes, "Had we the wit / To use the surplus for the deficit / We'd make a fairer world of it." Here he comments on how humanity is unable to use the surplus of fairness found in nature to supplement the "deficit" — the fairness that is lacking in society. By juxtaposing surplus and deficit, Francis allows the reader to understand that he is addressing imbalance and the possibility of rectifying it. While Francis argues that balance could potentially be achieved, he also counters with the argument that humanity is not prepared, or does not know how, to find that balance.
Structure, Form, and the Terza Rima Adaptation
In "Fair and Unfair," Francis attempts to create balance through the poem's structure and form. The poem is written in a modified terza rima format. Unlike the more traditional terza rima rhyme scheme of ABA-BCB-CDC and so on, "Fair and Unfair" follows an AAA-BBB pattern in which the final word of each line in the first stanza rhymes — fair, rare, and anywhere — and the final word of each line in the second stanza rhymes — wit, deficit, and it. While an imbalance is created when each stanza is examined separately, balance is restored through the inclusion of both stanzas together. For instance, imbalance is created through the odd number of lines in each individual stanza; however, balance is restored when both stanzas are considered as a unit, since each depends on the other.
Moreover, the poem's form is literally balanced across its two stanzas: two stanzas with a total of six lines. The first stanza serves to identify the problem, whereas the second offers a possible solution; without a problem there can be no solution, and vice versa. A caesura occurs between the two stanzas as the poem's focus shifts from stating the imbalance of fairness in the world to lamenting humanity's inability to create change and restore any semblance of balance.
Conclusion: Balance Through Structure and Message
In "Fair and Unfair," Francis does not only point out the inequity between the presence of beauty and the presence of justice, but also implies that humanity has the power to balance the two. Moreover, Francis believes, like Frost, that nature can provide guidance and that an individual can learn from it only if he or she is willing to look. Francis's work is largely free of complex literary devices, which allows him to communicate more clearly with the reader.
In "Fair and Unfair," however, structure plays a more prominent role than the few literary devices — anaphora and assonance — that do appear. Through the poem's structure and format, balance is achieved by the number of lines in each stanza and the number of stanzas themselves. Francis also uses the poem's format to present a problem in the first stanza and to offer a solution or compromise in the second. Through this structure and his colloquial writing style, Francis connects with his readers without coming across as pretentious or preachy.
Works Cited
Francis, Robert. "Fair and Unfair." Web. 7 November 2012.
"Robert Francis." eNotes. Web. 7 November 2012.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.