Robert Reich's Saving Capitalism: Inequality and Reform
This paper reviews Robert Reich's book Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few, examining his central arguments about economic inequality and the limitations of free-market ideology in the United States. Reich, a trained economist, contends that American capitalism has evolved to consolidate wealth among a narrow elite rather than benefit society broadly. The paper explores his comparison of capitalist systems across countries, his critique of political polarization, and his proposals for restoring economic mobility. The review concludes with a personal assessment of the book's strengths — particularly its diagnosis of inequality — and its limitations as a catalyst for meaningful social or political change.
- Introduction: Reich's credentials and paper's scope
- The Free Market as Ideology: Critiquing capitalism's near-religious status
- Inequality and Political Polarization: Reich's core inequality arguments and reception
- Comparative Capitalism and Reich's Proposals: Comparing U.S., Scandinavian, and Chinese models
- Critical Assessment: Book's strengths and limits for social change
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper opens with a strong contextual hook — noting that Reich's Nobel-level credentials make his left-leaning arguments all the more surprising and credible — which immediately establishes stakes for the reader.
- The direct quotation from Reich's Rolling Stone interview is used effectively to illustrate the polarized reception of the book, reinforcing the paper's analytical point rather than merely decorating it.
- The conclusion offers a genuine critical perspective, distinguishing between the book's diagnostic strengths and its limited capacity to drive real social change, which demonstrates independent analytical judgment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evaluative synthesis — it does not merely summarize Reich's arguments but situates them within a broader ideological and comparative context (free markets vs. Scandinavian models, U.S. political polarization) before rendering a reasoned personal assessment. This move from summary to contextual analysis to critical judgment is a foundational skill in academic book reviews.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic book-review structure: an introduction that establishes the author's background and the paper's scope; a central section that unpacks the book's core arguments, including direct quotation; and a conclusion that delivers a candid personal evaluation. At roughly 550 words, it is concise but covers the essential analytical moves expected at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
Robert Reich might seem an unexpected ally for the American Left or for the more liberal members of American society. Reich is a classically trained economist whose work has earned him recognition at the highest levels of the profession — credentials typically associated with more economically conservative positions. Yet the economic conditions that produced decades of growth across many advanced nations are changing rapidly, and standard economic frameworks are no longer delivering the results they once did. Reich makes many claims that will seem counterintuitive to those who believe the free market operates best when left to its own devices and insulated from government regulation.
The notion that hard work leads to success and a better life for one's family no longer applies to the new generation to the extent it did in previous decades. Middle-income children are now roughly half as likely to climb to the top income quintile compared to earlier generations, while those already at the top are increasingly likely to remain there. Trends like these create the conditions in which inequality becomes entrenched and form the foundation for Reich's arguments. This review examines the work Reich presents and his ideas for restoring economic mobility in the United States.
The Free Market as Ideology
Many of the arguments Reich advances are a direct response to the notion that free markets deserve an ideological status that places them beyond criticism. In the United States, capitalism and the free market are widely regarded as a system that has proven itself superior to any alternative, and this conviction has hardened into something closer to a religious sentiment than a public-policy position. At the same time, mounting evidence from other countries illustrates that alternatives to strict free-market adherence can be effective across a range of policy outcomes.
Inequality and Political Polarization
The central idea around which Reich organizes his book is that economic inequality is producing social outcomes that are inconsistent with sound public policy — and possibly with democracy itself. In an interview with Rolling Stone about the book, Reich described the two basic categories of responses he received on his book tour:
"You called your book Saving Capitalism. Why does capitalism need saving, and why is it worth saving? Those are the two questions I've been getting on the book tour. One group of people says, 'Why do you suppose it needs saving? It's perfect.' And another group says, 'Why do you want to save it? It's so rotten.'" (Konczal, 2015)
These polarized responses themselves help illustrate Reich's broader argument. The sheer divergence of reaction reflects the political fragmentation visible across so many areas of American life today.
Works Cited
Konczal, M. (2015, October 7). Robert Reich on Why Capitalism Needs Saving. Retrieved from Rolling Stone: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/robert-reich-on-why-capitalism-needs-saving-20151007
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.