A Rose for Emily vs. The Yellow Wallpaper: A Comparison
This essay compares William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" (1930) and Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" (1892), two short stories that illuminate the experiences of women in their respective historical moments in the United States. The paper examines how each author uses symbolism — particularly the house as a recurring motif — as well as differing narrative perspectives and structural techniques to portray female suffering and societal constraint. While Faulkner employs third-person narration, rich description, and foreshadowing, Gilman uses first-person interiority and fragmented prose to draw readers into a character's mental breakdown. Both stories ultimately depict women trapped by social expectations, escaping only through death or madness.
- Introduction: Two Stories, Two Eras: Two stories about American women compared
- Faulkner's Craft in 'A Rose for Emily': Faulkner's descriptive style and symbolic imagery
- Symbolism of the Rose and Narrative Structure: Rose symbolism, foreshadowing, and narrative voice
- Gilman's First-Person Interiority in 'The Yellow Wallpaper': Gilman's first-person style and nameless narrator
- The House as Symbol: Refuge Versus Prison: Houses as protection versus confinement in both stories
- Narrative Form and the Depiction of Mental Collapse: Fragmented prose mirrors narrator's deteriorating mind
- Conclusion: Escape Through Death or Madness: Both women escape societal traps differently
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay uses direct textual quotations from both stories to ground its analytical claims, allowing readers to evaluate the evidence firsthand rather than relying solely on the author's assertions.
- It maintains a consistent comparative framework throughout, returning to shared motifs — especially the house as symbol — to show how two authors treat the same theme in contrasting ways.
- The conclusion is concise and memorable, distilling the paper's central argument into a single parallel sentence: "one through death and the other through madness."
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis using a thematic organizing principle. Rather than treating each text in isolation, the author identifies shared symbols and narrative concerns (female confinement, the house as metaphor, the ending mood) and uses those shared elements to highlight how each author's technique produces a different emotional and interpretive effect on the reader.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a brief joint introduction establishing what the two stories share and how they differ. It then devotes substantial attention to Faulkner's story — covering description, symbolism of the rose, and narrative structure — before transitioning to Gilman's work. The middle section draws an explicit parallel through the house motif, and the final paragraphs focus on narrative form as a reflection of mental state, closing with parallel quoted endings from each text.
Introduction: Two Stories, Two Eras
"A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner (1930) and "The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1892) are both intimate stories about women living in their particular times in the United States. Both provide genuine insights into what it was like to be female during these historic periods. However, the styles of the two authors make the stories very different in their approach and effect on the reader.
Faulkner's Craft in 'A Rose for Emily'
"A Rose for Emily," told in five separate sections, is rich with the descriptions, plot structures, and mood that made Faulkner such a dynamic and memorable writer. After only a few lines, the reader is transported into that period and place. For example, when reading the second paragraph, one can easily imagine the look and style of the house:
"It was a big, squarish frame house that had once been white, decorated with cupolas and spires and scrolled balconies in the heavily lightsome style of the seventies, set on what had once been our most select street. But garages and cotton gins had encroached and obliterated even the august names of that neighborhood; only Miss Emily's house was left, lifting its stubborn and coquettish decay above the cotton wagons and the gasoline pumps — an eyesore among eyesores."
Yet Faulkner goes beyond describing the house by itself. He uses symbolic writing to compare the house with its owner, as if they had become one — which, ironically, they had. Although a "slender woman in white" who held her head high and proud when young, Emily later grew fat, gray-haired, and old. Like her house, she is aged, graying, and decayed.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.