This paper examines the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Code of Conduct in relation to both the conceptual and legal meanings of professionalism. Drawing on Hammer et al.'s "bicycle wheel" model of professionalism — which places core values such as integrity, duty, and altruism at the centre, with behavioural attributes radiating outward — the paper evaluates how well the RTPI Code addresses these dimensions. It finds that while the Code effectively covers accountability, respect, conflict of interest, and professional competence, it largely neglects more humanistic qualities such as compassion and empathy, fails to address legal compliance with national and local statutes, and omits surface-level professional behaviours entirely.
Codes of conduct in any industry are developed to bring about a standardised mode of professional behaviour. The following paper will discuss the conceptual and legal meaning of professionalism. This will be followed by a brief overview of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Code of Conduct. Whether this Code of Conduct addresses the conceptual and legal meaning of professionalism will then be discussed. Lastly, whether or not the RTPI Code of Conduct encourages professional behaviour will be argued.
Professionalism, as a conceptual term, is ambiguous in nature, and a variety of definitions have been applied throughout the decades. In general, professionalism involves individuals acting upon ideals and values in their service of individuals and populations who have entrusted them. It requires prioritising the interests of clients above one's own.
Hammer et al. conceptualise professionalism as being akin to a bicycle wheel. At the centre of the wheel are the core values associated with professionalism, including: caring, honour, altruism, duty, and integrity. Spokes representing behaviours associated with these values radiate from the centre, including: accountability, respect, compassion, and empathy. The outer ring of the concept — the tyre of the wheel — is the surface of professionalism and includes such things as punctuality, courtesy, and professional dress.
The Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), in their Guide to the Assessment of Professional Competence, builds on this conceptual definition. Professionalism is described as a dedication to identifying clients and the duties owed to them. It includes an understanding of the concept of conflict of interest. Lastly, according to the RTPI, professionalism involves "a commitment to lifelong learning to maintain and expand professional competence" ("Guide," n.d.). Legally, professionalism involves following the national and local statutes and regulations that affect the industry. However, the legal definition fails to account for the moral aspects of professionalism, which are instead reflected in an industry's code of conduct, such as the RTPI Code of Conduct.
The RTPI Code of Conduct was created to ensure all members act with honesty, competence, and integrity. It was developed to encourage members to exercise their professional judgement while discharging their duties with due care and diligence. The Code was also written to discourage discrimination, promote equal opportunity, and ensure the profession is not brought into disrepute ("Code," 2007). To this end, the RTPI Code of Conduct charges its members with a variety of obligations.
Members are charged with taking all reasonable steps to maintain their professional competence and to encourage and support other members in doing the same. Members shall not discriminate against others and shall promote equal opportunity. Members shall not make reports or statements contrary to their true professional opinion. The Code also charges members with ensuring that their private, personal, financial, and political interests do not cause a conflict of interest with their professional duties. In addition, members shall not disclose information acquired in confidence, nor use it to their own advantage ("Code," 2007).
Any discounts, gifts, or commissions received in the course of their duties must be reported to the member's employer or client. Terms of engagement must be agreed upon before commencing work, and the client must be notified in writing if work beyond this agreement is required. Members must ensure their services are appropriate when accepting instructions, and they must hold insurance against claims of breach of professional duty in accordance with RTPI regulations. Members must also follow RTPI regulations regarding informing the Institute of the details of their practice, employment, and business ("Code," 2007).
The RTPI Council may publish supplementary regulations, and members agree to comply with any additions made. Members will work to ensure all town planning matters are conducted in accordance with the RTPI Code of Conduct, regardless of who conducts the work. For members practising outside of the United Kingdom and Ireland, the status and integrity of the RTPI and the planning profession must still be upheld. Members agree to report any breach of the RTPI Code to the Institute, subject to legal restrictions, and to assist the Institute in any related investigation. Finally, the Council has the power to discipline members found to be in breach of the Code, though such action will only be taken where the Council believes the member is personally responsible for the breach.
"Evaluates Code against conceptual and legal definitions"
"Assesses gaps and strengths in encouraging conduct"
The concept of professionalism is somewhat ambiguous. Hammer et al. (2003) describe professionalism like a bicycle wheel, with morals at the centre, behaviours spoking out from these morals, and a professional surface presented to the world. The RTPI Code of Conduct addresses several of these aspects in an effort to ensure that members act with honour, integrity, and a sense of duty. Although the Code engages with some dimensions of the conceptual meaning of professionalism, it does not address the legal aspects. As such, there are certain behaviours the Code does encourage and others it simply fails to reach.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.