Rural Hospital Challenges and Solutions During COVID-19
This case study analysis examines the challenges faced by a rural Oregon health system serving three counties during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The paper identifies three core problems: shortages of equipment and personal protective equipment, inadequate staffing levels, and insufficient cultural awareness among healthcare staff — particularly relevant given the high infection rates among Hispanic and indigenous Guatemalan populations. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, the analysis evaluates several alternatives and ultimately recommends adoption of an all-payer global budget financing model administered through State Offices of Rural Health, combined with structured cultural competency training programs for healthcare workers.
- Introduction: Overview of rural Oregon COVID-19 case and thesis
- Background and Context: Equipment shortages, cultural barriers, and staffing strain
- Alternative Strategies: Multiple options for equipment, funding, and cultural competency
- Proposed Solutions: Global budget model and cultural training as best solutions
- Recommendations: Two key policy recommendations summarized
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper follows a clear, logical case study structure — moving from problem identification through alternatives to concrete recommendations — making the argument easy to follow.
- It grounds each recommendation in peer-reviewed sources, lending academic credibility to what could otherwise be a purely descriptive case analysis.
- The paper connects a specific local case (rural Oregon hospitals) to broader systemic policy issues, such as rural healthcare financing and cultural competency frameworks, demonstrating analytical range.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the classic case study analysis technique of moving from problem diagnosis to alternative evaluation to final recommendation. By weighing multiple alternatives before settling on preferred solutions, the author shows critical thinking rather than simply asserting conclusions. The use of direct quotation from Jongen et al. (2018) to support the recommendation on cultural training is a strong example of evidence integration.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into five sections: an introduction that frames the case and previews the thesis; a background section providing context on the health system, equipment shortages, cultural demographics, and staffing strain; an alternatives section laying out multiple options for each problem; a proposed solutions section that narrows those alternatives to the most evidence-supported choices; and a concise recommendations section summarizing the two key policy actions. This scaffolded structure is well-suited to graduate-level case study writing.
Introduction
This case study analysis examines the challenges that rural hospitals faced during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The case focuses on two hospitals operating under a larger regional health services network serving the rural town of Oregon, located 80 miles from Salem in Oregon State. Upon confirmation of the COVID-19 outbreak in Oregon in April 2020, the hospitals initiated an emergency disaster plan in anticipation of surging patient numbers. They experienced several problems managing the effects of the pandemic, however, including a lack of equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE), staffing limitations, and poor cultural awareness. This analysis proposes the adoption of the all-payer global budget financing model for rural hospitals and the implementation of cultural training programs for staff to address these challenges.
Background and Context
The health services network described in this case is a large healthcare system serving three counties in Oregon State. Immediately after positive COVID-19 cases were confirmed, the health system launched a massive testing campaign targeting residents with suspected symptoms, including chest pain, fever, breathing difficulties, fatigue, and persistent cough, among others. As part of the campaign, the hospitals offered free drive-through testing upon production of a clinician's order. However, the effectiveness of the campaign was limited by an insufficient supply of PPE and equipment, including test kits, M4 viral transport media, and nasopharyngeal swabs. The hospitals also lacked the equipment to carry out testing on-site at first and were forced to transport collected samples to urban centers, incurring additional transport costs.
Hispanic and indigenous Guatemalan residents accounted for the largest percentage of positive COVID-19 cases. The health system attributed this to cultural practices that encouraged congregate housing, carpooling, and walking together in groups — behaviors common among these communities that made it difficult to maintain social distancing requirements. Unfortunately, hospital staff lacked the cultural awareness needed to effectively educate these populations. Cultural awareness entails being sensitive to the differences and similarities between cultures and being able to apply that sensitivity when communicating with members of different cultural groups (Jongen et al., 2018). Cultural awareness makes it easier for healthcare staff to relate effectively to patients from different backgrounds, as it fosters appreciation for those who hold different beliefs and perspectives (Jongen et al., 2018).
The hospitals were also not adequately staffed to meet the high demand for services. Hospital managers were forced to share staff between facilities to serve the high volume of patients, and some staff members — such as the chief nursing officer — had to fulfill multiple roles due to the large workload. This resulted in fatigue and work-related stress among healthcare staff, which was further exacerbated by fear of infecting their families.
References
Fried, J. E., Liebers, D. T., & Roberts, E. T. (2020). Sustaining rural hospitals after COVID-19: The case for global budgets. JAMA, 342(2), 137–138.
Jongen, C., McCalman, J., & Bainbridge, R. (2018). Health workforce cultural competency interventions: A systematic scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1–15.
Nair, L., & Adetayo, O. A. (2019). Cultural competency and ethnic diversity in healthcare. International Open Access Journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 7(5), 1–3.
Segel, J. E., Ross, H., Edwards, J. L., Braun, K. A., & Davis, L. A. (2021). The unique challenges facing rural providers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Population Health Management, 24(3), 304–306.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.