This essay argues that the right to marry should be afforded to everyone regardless of sexual orientation. The paper reviews the legal definition of marriage, documents progress toward marriage equality in U.S. states, and addresses counterarguments rooted in religious tradition and cultural norms. It emphasizes that marriage fundamentally represents a commitment between two people and contends that denying marriage rights based on sexual orientation constitutes discrimination. The essay concludes that same-sex couples deserve equal legal rights and protections as heterosexual couples.
The topic of same-sex marriage has dominated headlines for many years, particularly regarding whether it should be legalized. This highly controversial subject has proven difficult for many people to accept. Imagine being in love with someone and being told you could not marry that person. How would that feel, and what if this were someone you absolutely could not live without? What would you do? These are questions that many people in our society face every day, simply because of their sexual orientation. Although controversial, the right to marry should be afforded to everyone regardless of sexual orientation.
When examining the legal definition of marriage, according to the Oxford Dictionary, marriage is "the formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife." However, in a changing society where past cultural norms are no longer the standard, this definition should evolve to fit the times. When it comes to same-sex marriage, homosexuals are making great progress in obtaining the same rights as heterosexuals. In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down portions of the Defense of Marriage Act that had denied same-sex couples the same benefits provided to heterosexual spouses. At the time this paper was written, only 13 states—including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Washington, Maine, Maryland, California, Delaware, and Rhode Island—allowed same-sex marriages, and only 6 states recognized civil unions while still banning legal marriage.
Public opinion reflects this shifting landscape. According to CNN reporting, 53 percent of Americans believed that same-sex marriages should be legal. Although this may seem modest, it demonstrates measurable progress toward affording equal rights to everyone. The trajectory of legal change and public support suggests that marriage equality continues to advance across the country.
Considerable opposition to same-sex marriage remains. Much of this opposition stems from a cultural belief that homosexuality contradicts human nature and is simply abnormal. From a religious perspective, many believe that same-sex marriage conflicts with traditional religious teachings and biblical principles. In an article published in 2013, it was noted that "Catholic Bishops argue that if marriage equality becomes the law of the land, their churches will be forced to accommodate it in various ways, and they fear that it will jeopardize their access to government grants and contracts." The same article reports that "The Family Research Council brought up the argument that same-sex marriage must be struck down because such couples cannot procreate." This objection stems from the belief that homosexual couples cannot properly raise a family because it contradicts societal norms regarding family structure.
When it comes to marriage, regardless of who the union is between, marriage is fundamentally based on the commitment and love two people share for each other, independent of sexual orientation. This is where the separation of church and state becomes essential. Following the Constitution, the First Amendment grants five basic liberties, including freedom of religion, which entitles people to their own beliefs. However, we must also recognize that if the argument is that marriage is a traditional institution, what about marriages that end in divorce? Does divorce not contradict the traditional belief that once married, one should remain married? How are same-sex marriages different in this respect?
As one scholar noted, "In many respects, the problem with gay marriage isn't gay marriage—that is, the act of gays and lesbians holding wedding ceremonies and receiving marriage licenses from the state." The core issue is not the ceremonial or emotional aspect but rather the legal recognition. When we deny marriage rights based on sexual orientation, we engage in discrimination that contradicts the democratic principle of equal protection under law.
Equal rights for all people must include the right to form and raise families. There is no credible evidence demonstrating that same-sex couples cannot raise children effectively or that children are harmed by having two parents of the same sex. According to the U.S. Census Bureau data from the 2010 American Community Survey, out of 594,000 same-sex couple households, 115,000 reported having children. This substantial number refutes the claim that same-sex couples do not form families.
In contemporary society, the traditional family structure of a mother and father raising children together is increasingly uncommon. Single-parent households now raise children as effectively as—or sometimes more effectively than—what is classified as traditional families. When considering same-sex couples in this context, it becomes clear that what matters is not the gender composition of parents but whether children are cared for and loved. The evidence supports this conclusion: family stability and parental commitment matter far more than parental gender or sexual orientation.
There are many arguments for and against same-sex marriage, and this is probably one of those arguments that will never end. However, what it really boils down to is that marriage should be seen as a union between two people who love each other with the intent of sharing their lives together. If we focus on who should or should not be allowed to marry based on sexual orientation, we engage in discrimination. In a world that continuously changes, we must adapt to evolving social norms. Same-sex couples should be afforded the same rights and liberties as heterosexual couples, regardless of what people's personal beliefs are.
You’re 96% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.