Samsung Acquisitions and Hibbett Sports Strategy Analysis
This paper examines mergers, acquisitions, and international business strategies through a comparative lens. It analyzes Samsung's acquisition of Hanguk Jeonja Tongsin and the role that transaction played in building Samsung Electronics into the world's largest electronics manufacturer. The paper then evaluates Samsung's international business-level strategy — combining cost leadership and differentiation — alongside its global (standardization) corporate-level strategy. In contrast, Hibbett Sports, a US-based sporting goods retailer, is presented as a firm that has grown organically without mergers or acquisitions. The paper identifies Olympia Sports as a viable acquisition target for Hibbett and recommends cost leadership and acquisition-based corporate strategy to strengthen Hibbett's competitive position in the domestic sporting goods market.
- Introduction: Overview of Samsung and Hibbett Sports comparison
- Mergers and Acquisitions: Theory and Samsung's acquisition background
- Samsung's Acquisition of Hanguk Jeonja Tongsin: How one acquisition built Samsung Electronics
- Hibbett Sports and Organic Growth: Hibbett's growth model and Olympia Sports proposal
- Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies: Strategy frameworks applied to both firms
- Conclusion: Summary recommendations for both companies
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear comparative structure, contrasting Samsung (international, acquisition-driven) with Hibbett Sports (domestic, organic growth), which gives readers two concrete reference points throughout.
- Strategic concepts — cost leadership, differentiation, multi-domestic, global, and transnational strategies — are defined before being applied, making the analysis accessible and grounded in theory.
- The recommendation for Hibbett to acquire Olympia Sports is well-supported with specific details: geographic complementarity, revenue figures, and competitive landscape context.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied strategic analysis by linking theoretical frameworks (Porter's national diamond, Hill & Jones's strategy typology) directly to real company decisions. Rather than describing theory in the abstract, the student uses each framework as a lens to explain observed firm behavior — for example, explaining Samsung's global strategy choice by reference to its standardized product line and Korean engineering capabilities.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that identifies both companies and previews the analytical agenda. A general section on mergers and acquisitions follows, establishing theoretical context. Two firm-specific sections then apply that context — one on Samsung's acquisition history and one on Hibbett's organic growth and acquisition opportunity. A combined business-level and corporate-level strategy section evaluates both firms using international strategy frameworks. A brief conclusion synthesizes the key takeaways. This funnel structure (theory → firm application → strategy recommendations → conclusion) is appropriate for a strategic management paper at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
A well-crafted strategy is crucial for business success in both the local and international markets. Firms achieve this success by using business-level strategies, corporate-level strategies, or both. Business-level strategies (such as cost leadership and differentiation) influence a firm's competitive advantage in its products and markets, while corporate-level strategies (such as mergers and acquisitions) affect the firm as a whole (Hill & Jones, 2012). Firms operating in the global market must also choose effective international business-level strategies and international corporate-level strategies.
This paper compares an international company, Samsung, which has a history of mergers and acquisitions, with a US-based company, Hibbett Sports, Inc., which operates solely in the US and has no history of mergers or acquisitions. The paper specifically evaluates Samsung's acquisition strategy as well as its international business-level and corporate-level strategies. It also identifies one company that would be a profitable acquisition or merger candidate for Hibbett Sports and proposes one business-level strategy and one corporate-level strategy the company should consider.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions constitute important inorganic growth strategies for firms. A merger involves two autonomous firms joining to form a single entity, while an acquisition involves one firm purchasing another. Mergers and acquisitions are driven by numerous motivations, including financial synergy, economies of scale, growth acceleration, product and risk diversification, market share expansion, strategic realignment, and tax considerations (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2010). For instance, a banking firm contemplating entry into the insurance industry could acquire an already established insurance firm, thereby avoiding the complexity of building that presence from scratch.
Mergers and acquisitions have been integral to Samsung's growth. Samsung is a Korean multinational firm with interests in diverse industries, including consumer electronics, textiles, insurance, retail, food processing, chemicals, construction, shipbuilding, and securities. Nonetheless, electronics represent the firm's major source of revenue, accounting for more than 70% of total revenues (Samsung, 2016). The firm designs, develops, manufactures, and markets a wide range of electronic products, including smartphones, tablets, computers, television sets, LCD displays, household appliances, memory chips, semiconductors, and storage devices. These products are marketed in more than 100 countries worldwide.
Founded as a trading company in 1938, Samsung has achieved tremendous growth over the decades to become one of the most powerful business conglomerates globally (Samsung, 2016). Throughout its operational history, the firm has made several acquisitions, the most consequential of which is discussed in the following section.
References
Frainshmidt, S., Smith, A., & Judge, W. (2016). National competitiveness and Porter's diamond model: the role of MNE penetration and governance quality. Global Strategy Journal, 6(2), 81–104.
Hibbett Sports Inc. (2017). Investor relations. Retrieved from
Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2012). Essentials of strategic management (3rd ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2010). Exploring corporate strategy. London: Prentice Hall.
Samsung. (2016). Consolidated financial statements of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and subsidiaries. Retrieved from
Segal-Horn, S., & Faulkner, D. (2010). Understanding global strategy. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.