This paper examines discrimination against service animals and their owners in the United States, arguing that widespread ignorance about the role of service animals drives unlawful exclusion from housing, businesses, and public spaces. The paper reviews the history of service animals, outlines key protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act (1990), and presents documented cases of discrimination — including a U.S. Senate incident and a landlord attempting to evict a family with an autistic child. The paper also addresses hate crimes targeting service animals and concludes by calling for expanded training programs and greater public education.
The paper effectively uses the "problem-solution" argumentative structure. It establishes the problem (public ignorance and discrimination), supports it with evidence (expert quotations, documented incidents), and closes with actionable recommendations (more training centers, public education, federal resources). This is a strong model for persuasive writing on social issues at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens with a definition and historical overview of service animals, then introduces the legal framework of the ADA. Two documented cases of discrimination follow, each illustrating a different context (government and housing). The paper then escalates to hate crimes before concluding with a call for expanded training and public awareness. Each paragraph advances the central thesis that ignorance, not malice alone, drives most service animal discrimination.
Service animals — guide dogs, therapy dogs, and others — are discriminated against by businesses, housing authorities, and public policy. Service animals perform a vital and often deeply personal service for thousands of individuals in this country. They are the eyes, ears, and helping hands of many disabled people who could not live independently without them. Unfortunately, many people and businesses still do not understand the critical need for service animals, and as a result, they discriminate against the animals and their owners.
Service animals perform a wide variety of tasks for people with disabilities, and many disabled individuals would not be able to function effectively without them. Initially, service animals were trained to help lead their blind owners through everyday tasks, from walking to work to navigating their own homes. Called "guide dogs," many were trained by The Seeing Eye, Inc., and those dogs became widely known as "seeing-eye dogs."
Today, animals — not just dogs — provide a variety of services for the disabled and elderly. Guide dogs still help the blind, and service animals are also trained to help the deaf "hear," and to aid wheelchair-bound individuals by leading or pulling them, or assisting with balance and movement. They can pick up and carry items, notify others if their owner is having a seizure, and even act as companions and therapy animals for people with severe conditions such as autism. As one expert writes, "Service dogs perform tasks such as operating light switches, retrieving items, pulling wheelchairs, and opening doors. Hearing dogs assist people who are deaf or hearing impaired by alerting them to sounds such as telephone rings, crying infants, alarms, and people calling them by name" (Henderson).
Service animals are not pets — they are highly trained assistants who can make the difference between a disabled person living independently or requiring placement in a group home or assisted-living facility. Today, they include more than dogs. A variety of animals have been trained to assist the disabled, from miniature horses to pot-bellied pigs and beyond.
The use of service animals is not a new idea. As one researcher notes, "The use of animals to assist their ailing human counterparts dates to the early Greeks who gave horseback rides to raise the spirits of people who were incurably ill, and documentation from the seventeenth century makes medical reference to horseback riding as treatment for gout, neurological disorders, and low morale" (Henderson). Today, service animals perform more duties than ever before, and because of this, some uninformed businesses and individuals may discriminate against service animals before they understand their function and necessity.
Many people do not understand the function of service animals and think of them as simply highly trained pets. This misunderstanding can lead to service animals and their owners being banned from everything from housing to sporting events, with serious legal consequences. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), passed by Congress in 1990, ensures that disabled Americans cannot be discriminated against in housing, employment, and other areas of everyday life that non-disabled people often take for granted.
Service animals can help people with disabilities lead more fulfilling lives, and they are addressed within the ADA in several key areas, including housing, shopping, and travel. Service animal owners cannot be barred from housing, places of business, employment, or public transportation because of their animals. Business owners must make accommodations for the animals, and if they do not, they can face federal charges. While the ADA does not mention service animals by name in every provision, many sections have been interpreted to pertain to them, and the federal government has issued numerous regulations and guidance documents on complying with the ADA by allowing service animals to accompany their owners. Nevertheless, problems with adherence to and understanding of the law persist.
Society still does not fully understand service animals, or the vital assistance they provide to the infirm, the elderly, and the disabled. As long as this ignorance continues, discrimination against service animals and their owners will continue. Many service animal training organizations conduct outreach programs to help the public understand service animals and their legal rights, and much of this work is funded through grants and private donations. The federal government also maintains resources covering service animals and what constitutes discrimination against these animals and their owners.
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.