Social Reality, Inequality, and Oppression: Sociology Theories
This paper addresses four foundational questions in sociological theory by drawing on key texts from Berger and Luckmann, Robert K. Merton, Ralf Dahrendorf, and Patricia Hill Collins. It examines how social reality is constructed through habituation and institutions, how structural functionalists explain societal maintenance through manifest and latent functions, whether class inequality is inevitable according to conflict theory, and how feminist thought — particularly Black feminist theory — explains the intersecting oppressions of race, class, and gender faced by African-American women. Each section engages directly with primary source arguments to synthesize core concepts in classical and contemporary sociology.
- How Is Social Reality Possible? Berger and Luckmann: Institutions objectify social order through habituation
- How Are Societies Maintained? Structural Functionalism and Merton: Manifest and latent functions sustain social cohesion
- Is Inequality of Social Classes Inevitable? Dahrendorf and Conflict Theory: Class conflict and interest groups generate social inequality
- How Is Racial and Gender Oppression Possible? Collins and Black Feminist Thought: Dominant knowledge systems reinforce racial and gender oppression
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each section directly answers a focused question using a specific theorist or text, giving the paper clear analytical organization.
- The use of concrete examples — the Hopi rain ceremony, the Writers Guild strike, Madison Avenue beauty standards — grounds abstract sociological concepts in observable social phenomena.
- The paper demonstrates genuine engagement with primary sources rather than mere summary, particularly in its treatment of Merton's distinction between manifest and latent functions and Collins's concept of subjugated knowledge.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper consistently applies the technique of concept illustration: it introduces an abstract theoretical term (e.g., "latent function," "subjugated knowledge," "habitualization") and immediately anchors it to a real-world example. This is an effective undergraduate strategy for demonstrating comprehension of difficult sociological frameworks without losing the reader in jargon.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into four question-and-answer sections, each corresponding to a different theoretical tradition: social constructionism (Berger and Luckmann), structural functionalism (Merton), conflict theory (Dahrendorf), and Black feminist thought (Collins). The format is direct and examination-style, moving through each question systematically before concluding with a Works Cited section in MLA format.
How Is Social Reality Possible? Berger and Luckmann
The best way to address the issue of social reality — what authors Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann call "human order" in The Social Construction of Reality — is to examine it on two levels. On the first level is the concept of "world openness," referring to the natural world outside of human boundaries. This natural world has an impact on human activities, but it is ultimately superseded by what humans do within their societal dynamics. The second level constitutes a kind of "world closedness," in which the natural world is closed out and an artificial, socially constructed world is created for human beings.
Because humankind is inherently unstable, some form of social order is necessary, the authors argue. Indeed, a social reality (or order) is an "anthropological necessity" to avoid chaos. Humans arrive at that reality through their habits — what the authors call "habitualized actions," whether good, bad, or otherwise. The habitualization process then evolves into institutions, which provide the social glue that holds society together and furnishes a measure of control. Institutions themselves are the products of history.
As to how institutions provide that necessary degree of control — and prevent social order from collapsing into chaos, a dark reality experienced at various points throughout human history — Berger and Luckmann argue that institutions possess a "coercive power" over the individual that cannot be denied or defied. The institution existed before the child was born into the society, and the individual knows it will remain after he or she is gone; hence it is an "objective reality." It simply is. Whether or not one understands the institution, likes it, or actively interacts with it, that institution exercises power over the individual. The institution is social reality objectified.
Each succeeding generation will leave its mark on institutions and exert some degree of influence, but the social world — "social reality," if you will — revolves around the objectivity of institutions, and it endures as generations arrive and disappear.
How Are Societies Maintained? Structural Functionalism and Merton
According to the views of structural functionalists, societies are maintained through institutions, which create and apply regulations, laws, and proper modes of behavior. More specifically, in Robert K. Merton's essay, societies are maintained through the interaction of "manifest functions" and "latent functions." Manifest functions, Merton explains, refer to those "objective consequences for a specified unit (person, subgroup, social or cultural system) which contribute to its adjustment or adaptation." These consequences were intended to assist in adjustment or adaptation to the social institution in question — or, in broader terms, to the maintenance of society itself.
Latent functions, by contrast, are the unintended and unrecognized consequences that result from actions of the same order. Examples are important here, as Merton's writing tends toward the esoteric. The manifest functions can be separated from the latent functions through examination of controversial phenomena such as Hopi rain-making ceremonies, Navajo witchcraft, various personality dynamics, national security, and the use of propaganda as a means of social control.
For example, when society examines the Hopi ceremony from a manifest point of view — that rain should come if effort has been made to bring it — and no rain is produced, the manifest function frames the Hopi as engaged in superstition. But from the perspective of latent function, the unrecognized consequences of the ceremony may include positive social energy: the ritual may bring the Hopi community closer together as a spiritual unit. Through the lens of latent function, then, the Hopi maintain their society through acts such as chanting in unison and participating in ceremonies that generate a sense of commonality. Rain or no rain, these practices strengthen their culture by bonding the community together. As Merton writes, "Findings concerning latent functions represent a greater increment in knowledge than findings concerning manifest functions." The Hopi example is just one of many that could illustrate this principle.
Works Cited
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books, 1966, pp. 51–55, 59–61.
Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Unwin Hyman, 1990, pp. 221–238.
Dahrendorf, Ralf. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford University Press, 1959, pp. 241–248.
Merton, Robert K. Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, 1957, pp. 60–.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.