This paper explores key dimensions of social inequality in contemporary Australia through four interconnected questions. It defines social stratification using Weberian and Marxist frameworks, then examines how class divisions manifest across Australia's upper, middle, and working classes. It investigates the rise of Islamophobia following September 11, 2001, analyzing the relationship between religion and ethnicity in Australian society. The paper then applies conflict theory, labeling theory, and institutional racism to explain racially disparate criminal justice outcomes. Finally, it addresses why free public education has not produced equal educational outcomes, citing parental expectations, ability tracking, socioeconomic background, and structural barriers as contributing factors.
The paper consistently uses the technique of applying competing theoretical frameworks to a single concrete example — most clearly in the criminal justice scenario, where conflict theory, labeling theory, and three forms of institutional racism are each used to explain the same racially disparate outcome. This multi-framework analysis is a hallmark of sociological reasoning at the undergraduate level.
The paper is organized as four discrete but thematically linked sections. Each begins with a conceptual definition, moves to theoretical grounding, and then applies the framework to Australian evidence. The education section is the longest and most evidence-rich, drawing on the Coleman report, ACER data, and the Life Chances longitudinal study to build a layered argument about structural disadvantage.
Social stratification refers to the division of society into hierarchical layers based on socioeconomic conditions. Some groups are granted more power and prestige than others, while lower groups are dominated by those above them (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed.).
Social stratification is founded on four core principles. First, it reflects society rather than individual differences and therefore does not operate according to meritocracy. Second, it is fixed and transmitted from generation to generation. Third, it is universal but takes different forms in different countries. Fourth, social stratification is not merely inequality of power but also reflects differences in beliefs that vary according to group membership — for instance, higher groups are more likely to be politically conservative and to share a particular religious perspective (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed.).
Social stratification is usually categorized into three main classes: upper class, middle class, and lower class, each of which is subdivided into occupational sectors. Research consistently shows that high social inequality is positively associated with increased homicide rates, infant mortality, obesity, teenage pregnancies, emotional depression, teen suicide, and larger prison populations among the lowest social strata.
Weber argued that class differences are irreversible and that people are inescapably born into certain brackets, which leads inevitably to variations in life chances (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed.). In Weber's framework there are four classes: the propertied class, the intelligentsia, the traditional petty bourgeoisie, and the working class. According to Marx, the working class was created by the bourgeoisie for purposes of control and manipulation. Weber accepted this view but also emphasized status and party identification as additional instruments of class definition.
Stratification is generally seen as an unfair feature of social life in which position is determined not by merit but by birth. Dominant classes manipulate subordinate classes, and members of inferior classes have almost no realistic chance of overcoming their circumstances on their own terms.
Australia has an upper class, an upper and lower middle class, and a working class. The upper class consists of property owners, people of inherited wealth, corporate leaders, and other wealthy individuals. Many members of Australia's upper class appear to identify with a global agenda rather than a national one (Sklair, 1996). The middle class consists of three spheres:
The lower middle class comprises people with working-class incomes who maintain a middle-class lifestyle. The central middle class consists of non-manual professionals such as doctors, accountants, and engineers — the majority of Australians, and the group most Australians aspire to join. The upper middle class includes people whose professions and incomes are middle-class but who live according to upper-class standards.
The working class is made up of two tiers: those in manual occupations, ranging from unskilled to skilled blue-collar workers such as tradespeople, factory workers, and laborers; and the underclass, who are homeless or unemployed, living at or below the poverty line, dependent on welfare, and with extremely limited life choices (Sklair, 1996).
Most Australians believe that social and upward mobility is possible in Australia. Nonetheless, observers such as Aspin (1996) argue that structured social inequality clearly exists, "especially in the areas that affect life chances, such as income, work, education, health and involvement with the law" (p. 94). The probability of surviving infancy, flourishing in childhood, remaining healthy, avoiding imprisonment, and obtaining a good job and education all depend, in Australia, on one's social class. This may not differ fundamentally from countries like the United States, which also espouses the demolition of class differences while socioeconomic stratification persists.
Additionally, indigenous Australians, particularly Aboriginal peoples, face greater obstacles than the normative Caucasian population, and this clearly affects their chances of success (Aspin, 1996). The longitudinal Life Chances study conducted by the Brotherhood of St. Laurence (2006) found that 73% of low-income families remained in their low-income niche since birth, with the gap between rich and poor increasing by 31% over time. As Aspin (2006) noted, "The concept of class, and the differentiated outcomes that it can produce, continues to prove relevant within the changing environment that these young people are growing up in" (p. 30).
Islamophobia consists of overt and covert bigotry and discrimination toward Muslims, directed at them regardless of their individual practices or beliefs and based solely on their perceived religious and ethnic identity (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed.). It has been formally defined as "fear of and prejudicial views on the Islamic faith and Muslims as an ethno-religious community" (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed., p. 447).
Islamophobia is a contemporary form of prejudice that is widespread across much of the Western world and appears particularly pronounced in Australia (Hassan, 2012), especially following the September 11, 2001 attacks and Australia's subsequent participation in the "War on Terror." Verbal and physical abuse of women wearing headscarves or the chador, as well as numerous other incidents of racist conduct toward Muslims, have been documented in the Australian media.
A central perception driving Islamophobia is that Islam poses a threat to the Western way of life. Scholars distinguish between open and closed views of Islam: the open view acknowledges the wide spectrum of Muslim belief and practice, including those who are peace-seeking and open-minded, while the closed view is essentially racist in character (Homes, Hughes, & Julian, 2nd ed.). Islamophobia reflects the closed view and appears to be prevalent in Australia.
Many observers believe Australia to be a country that publicly espouses tolerance while in practice demanding assimilation. The dominant religion is Protestantism, associated with the white upper-middle and upper classes, while many in the lower classes practice Islam, Hinduism, or other faiths. Intolerance toward these ethnic and religious groups is evident. Socioeconomic status appears to parallel religious affiliation, with advantages flowing disproportionately to those in upper brackets who identify with a particular strain of Christianity — or with agnosticism or atheism.
Hassan (2012) observes that while ethnic Australians are told to "assimilate," they are "cleverly divided, weakened and put in 'their places' in segregated communities." Indigenous Australians are especially subject to racism and discrimination. Although Australia officially espouses multiculturalism and equal treatment regardless of background, research has shown that approximately 85% of Australians believe racism remains a problem in the country (Hassan, 2012).
Education is both a determinant of income and class, and is itself determined by income and class. All of this is highly apparent in the social stratification of contemporary Australian society. Whether examining class structure, religious discrimination, criminal justice outcomes, or educational inequality, the same underlying mechanisms recur: inherited disadvantage, institutional bias, and the persistence of hierarchies that meritocratic ideals alone cannot dismantle.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.