This paper examines the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and criminal behavior in American cities, drawing on sociological and public health research. Building on Blau and Blau's (1982) foundational work, the paper argues that it is not poverty itself but inequality — particularly racial socioeconomic inequality — that most strongly predicts violent crime. The paper explores how factors such as neighborhood conditions, drug use, single-parent family structures, prior incarceration, and unemployment interact to create cycles of low SES and criminal behavior. It also considers the particular impact of these dynamics on youth, adolescent development, and minority communities, and concludes that a fuller understanding of the class-crime relationship requires comparative research across all social classes.
Unequal socioeconomic conditions in American cities lead to violent crime (Blau & Blau, 1982). These researchers identified associations between violent crime rates and social factors such as population size, ethnicity, income, and educational level. Thus, the degree of inequality in socioeconomic status (SES) may be related to criminal behavior. Additionally, people from a low-SES background are vulnerable to negative life events such as single parenting, social isolation, and unemployment. Although social inequality can foster diversity, it is also an issue that causes harm in a growing society and results in social turmoil.
Social status also alters the way people perceive the world and limits available opportunities. Being assigned a particular social class based on income, the location and size of one's home, health, and level of education contributes to broader problems in society. Although crime is often associated with low socioeconomic status, there is great difficulty in proving that criminal behavior is directly caused by SES. However, a substantial body of evidence supports the view that various components of inequality are related to higher crime rates. Inequality in socioeconomic status between racial groups is associated with higher crime rates, and levels of all types of violent crime are associated with the degree of inequality between Black and white Americans. This supports the suggestion that inequality among races may lead to increased violent behavior, though the influence of race itself is small compared to the effect of inequality among races.
Race is often associated with the neighborhoods where minorities live. General income inequality in the community as a whole is associated with higher criminal behavior. High-poverty neighborhoods are more likely to be physically deteriorated and to have more crime and street violence, greater availability of illegal drugs, and more negative peer influences and adult role models (McLoyd, 1998; National Research Council, 1995). Evidence supports that higher rates of crime occur in inner-city minority housing projects. From 1980 to 1990, nearly 19% of residents of low-status suburbs were minorities. Research has indicated that even after controlling for family income and years of schooling, minorities were still three times as likely as whites to live in low-status rather than high-status suburbs. One possible explanation is that minorities may choose to live in less advantaged suburbs due to a strong preference for living near other minorities and in proximity to the central city.
The characteristics of high-poverty neighborhoods may have harmful consequences for the cognitive functioning, socialization, physical health, emotional functioning, and academic achievement of children and adolescents, which in turn results in higher rates of criminal behavior (Ellen & Turner, 1997). However, Blau and Blau (1982) argue that the general level of inequality in a community — considering all races together — directly influences only those crimes involving relatives, friends, and regular associates.
Drug use is associated with a higher level of criminal behavior and subsequent incarceration. Many drug users turn to criminal behavior before they are apprehended. Drug use is reportedly higher among lower-SES populations. Although treatment programs are available in lower-SES communities, drug use continues to be a major contributor to criminal behavior in these communities.
There are various ways of examining whether a person's position in the social world contributes to the amount of crime that occurs. Regarding youth crime specifically, there are many different opinions and correlations as to why young people commit crime. The most common stereotype is that lower-class youth commit more criminal activity than middle- and upper-class youth; however, this is extremely difficult to prove due to a lack of definitive data. Recent changes in family structure, and the consequences for family incomes of children and adolescents, have eroded the support that many adolescents receive as they grow up. As single-parent families spread over the past four decades, the proportion of children living in such families rose from 10% in 1965 to 27% in 2001 (Ellwood & Jencks, 2002). Single-parent families are associated with lower SES and higher rates of criminal behavior among youth.
Economic stress may diminish the emotional well-being of parents, which has direct and indirect negative effects on children. Adolescents growing up in families under economic stress or with a single parent may be poorly supervised and often gain autonomy too early (Dornbusch et al., 1985), leading to increased criminal behavior. Unsupervised adolescents are more likely to engage in criminal behavior (Richardson et al., 1993). Low family income has also been associated with early sexual activity, cigarette smoking, adolescent pregnancy, and delinquency (National Research Council, 1995; Blum et al., 2000).
The main settings that influence how children and adolescents develop include families, neighborhoods, and schools. The quality of these settings — whether they are supportive and nurturing or dangerous and destructive — has a profound influence on adolescents' chances for successful adult lives or involvement in criminal behavior. Blau and Blau suggest that negative social situations such as marital breakdown are associated with lower SES and are related indirectly to higher incidences of rape and robbery.
A prison record and current employment status are two important dimensions of socioeconomic status (Bonczar, 2003). Prior incarceration has adverse effects on future socioeconomic status. Incarceration and time spent in prison destabilize marriages and reduce the standard of living of the free partner and their children. Marriage and the greater economic security that typically accompanies it are less likely for unmarried men who have served time. As a result, parents who have served time in prison are more likely to transmit similar outcomes to their children — both directly and indirectly through broken marriages — thereby perpetuating a cycle of low socioeconomic status and criminal behavior.
"Prison records worsen employment and perpetuate inequality"
"Frustration with inequality underlies poverty-crime link"
There is a stereotype that poor-class youth are the ones who commit crime. The fact is that many studies conclude that social class has no direct link to crime — it does, on the other hand, have an indirect link. To further understand the class-crime relationship, more research is clearly necessary. There is no shortage of interest in the subject, but upper-class populations are unlikely to attract much attention in crime research. It is vital to study all aspects of crime so that meaningful comparisons can be made, helping to clarify crime trends and fully illuminate the relationship between socioeconomic status and criminal behavior.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.