This paper compares two influential but fundamentally different theories of intelligence: Charles Spearman's model of general intelligence and Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Spearman, writing in 1904, proposed that a single measurable factor — "g" — underlies all cognitive performance, drawing on observations of consistent academic achievement across subjects. Gardner, by contrast, identifies eight distinct intelligences and argues that their relative importance varies across cultural contexts. The paper examines how each theory conceptualizes the nature, fluidity, and measurement of intelligence, and considers their different implications for educational practice.
Spearman's Model of Intelligence and Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences have both played important roles in the modern understanding of intelligence. At the same time, the two theories are fundamentally very different. Spearman's model is based on an understanding of intelligence as a single, measurable variable — "g." In contrast, Gardner sees intelligence as an amalgamation of as many as eight different forms. Gardner's model allows for a more fluid understanding of intelligence that takes cultural differences into consideration, while Spearman's model is more rigid and treats intelligence as largely innate.
The study of intelligence is notoriously difficult. In many ways, intelligence is an abstract concept composed of a number of different components. It is an internal, mental process that is not truly grounded in a concrete, objective reality. As such, both Spearman's and Gardner's attempts at understanding intelligence are ultimately limited by the very nature of intelligence itself.
Spearman's Model of Intelligence has been widely accepted and has played an important role in shaping modern thought on the subject. Charles Spearman first formulated his theories on general intelligence in 1904. In his seminal work, he argued that there is a common element that acts as the basis of all other intelligences. This general intelligence is referred to as "g," while more specific intelligences are described as "s." In Spearman's two-factor analysis, individuals draw on "g" in order to deal with different types of problems.
Spearman's theory has its roots in the observation that certain individual school children tend to score well across a variety of different subjects, including French, mathematics, and the classics. This pattern led him to propose that a single general intelligence governs human intellect, thereby explaining the similarity in scores across a wide variety of academic subjects (Spearman, 1904).
Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences disagrees with Spearman's assertion that basic intelligence is a single factor measurable through standard intelligence tests. Gardner argues instead that intelligence is actually made up of several distinct abilities. Specifically, he identifies eight separate intelligences: linguistic, musical, logical-mathematical, spatial, intrapersonal, interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, and naturalistic.
Where Spearman argues that human success is defined by "g," Gardner contends that individual abilities are formed from a blend of all eight intelligences. According to Gardner, people draw on some or all of the eight intelligences in the roles and tasks they perform in daily life.
"Culture, age, and situational variation in intelligence"
"How each theory shapes educational practice"
Both Spearman's and Gardner's theories of intelligence have had a profound impact on modern thought about human cognitive ability. Spearman's ideas reflect the widely held view of intelligence as a single, measurable variable, while Gardner's model takes into account the greater range of human experience and ability. As such, Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences may ultimately provide a richer and more complete understanding of human intelligence and potential.
Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.