This paper examines two contrasting organizational leadership models using biological metaphors: the spider, representing traditional centralized leadership with a command hierarchy, and the starfish, representing decentralized networks with distributed power. The analysis compares transactional leadership approaches in spider organizations with the crowdsourced, empowered decision-making of starfish models. Through case studies like Craigslist and emerging crowdsourcing applications, the paper demonstrates how each model's strengths operate in different business contexts. The conclusion argues that while both models have merit, managers should increasingly seek opportunities to build starfish functions that empower employees and customers to lead themselves.
The spider can represent the traditional centralized organization. It is a creature that has eight legs coming out of its body and a number of eyes on its head that can see in any direction. If you cut off a spider's head, it will die, similar to an organization with a traditional structure and a centralized leader. However, in contrast, a starfish operates much differently. The starfish represents a more decentralized organization because its body is largely decentralized itself. Instead of having a centralized head, the starfish has a neural network that does not have a centralized command. If you cut off a starfish's leg, it survives just fine; it can even grow a new one. Both of these models work well in nature as well as in the business world in different circumstances. However, there are some opportunities to use the strengths of each model in a hybrid form. This analysis will discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of these models as well as the opportunities to combine various features into a new creature or method of leadership.
The traditional leadership model has been challenged by increasing complexity that has arisen in globalized markets fueled by technological achievements. One way that companies have responded is to attempt to standardize their business processes in order to reproduce operations through a centralized command. This approach has also been aided by the use of technology and advanced ERP systems that can account for complex systems in real time.
There are many factors that can account for successful standardization. For example, one factor that affects a firm's competitiveness in such an arrangement is how well knowledge transfers in an organization across international borders (Tsai, 2001). However, there can be many barriers to knowledge transfer that include language and cultural differences. Another study has identified that the absorptive capacity of knowledge transfer is correlated with the employees' abilities and willingness to learn (Minbaeva, et al., 2003). Therefore, there is also a motivational dimension to standardization that can prevent the effectiveness of a centralized command structure.
Much of the spider model seems to operate on the exchange values in leadership, or transactional leadership. Transactional leadership is defined as an exchange relationship between the managers and the employees who are all focused on meeting their own self-interests and fulfilling their organizational expectations. Transactional leadership consists of monitoring, controlling, and motivating employees through economic incentives and other types of exchange incentives (Bass, 1985). One popular form of transactional leadership is management by exception, in which a manager will monitor performance and only take corrective actions when a problem is noted. This allows a manager to monitor a large number of employees from a centralized leadership structure.
"Distributed power, crowdsourcing, customer empowerment"
Determining whether a spider or starfish is the appropriate model will be entirely dependent on the situation and the environment. In many cases, the spider will be effective, and in others a starfish model could be revolutionary. The important thing to consider is that the power of the starfish model is becoming more apparent continuously. Thus, a manager should constantly scan for opportunities to empower employees or even customers to handle more of the leadership functions themselves. Generally, the person closest to the problem is the one that is best able to deal with it. Therefore, empowering employees and building starfish functions can be vital critical success factors in the continued development of organizations.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.