This paper examines the Stark Law — three federal provisions governing physician self-referral for Medicare and Medicaid patients — through the lens of a hypothetical medical group, K Street Internal Medicine, seeking to offer comprehensive in-house services in Washington, DC. The paper defines the conflict-of-interest concerns that motivated the legislation, identifies the designated health services subject to Stark restrictions, and explores the Group Practice exception as a potential compliance pathway. It concludes with practical structural recommendations designed to allow K Street to operate legally while meeting the full-service needs of its target patient population.
The Stark Laws are three separate provisions that govern physician self-referral for Medicare and Medicaid patients, named after U.S. Congressman Pete Stark, who first sponsored the legislation in the early 1990s. The idea behind the laws arose from the practice of physician self-referral — that is, the practice of a doctor referring a patient to a medical organization in which the doctor held some form of financial interest. Critics of this practice believed that there was an inherent conflict of interest, as well as a direct fiscal benefit to the physician, which might encourage over-testing, the use of procedures more expensive than the market could bear, and undue pressure on the patient — a captive audience — to use only those providers and services recommended by their physician (Law, 2011).
A group of physicians and medical professionals formed a new medical group called K Street Internal Medicine. This group was to be located in the high-profile K Street district of Washington, DC, primarily to serve employed individuals working either for the government or for agencies serving the government. Given the high-end real estate market of the area, the founders reasoned that by providing a well-rounded and comprehensive range of services, they would be better positioned to meet the needs of their target population. Indeed, a number of the physicians, support staff, and ancillary service providers viewed K Street's ability to offer a broad range of services as integral both to their participation in the organization and to the organization's path to solvency.
There are, however, questions and issues regarding K Street's logistical plan and its compliance with the Stark Law. These laws, designed to prevent undue collusion and unfair practices within the medical community, were created primarily to ensure that Medicare and Medicaid billing practices remained legal and did not serve a physician's personal financial benefit when providing ancillary services to patients. K Street Internal Medicine wishes to create an in-house laboratory, a physical therapy group, and access to additional specialists — all under one roof, and therefore under one ownership structure. The central question is whether this arrangement would violate the Stark Law and, if so, what type of organizational structure could be established that would remain legally compliant.
Under a strict interpretation of the Stark Law, designated health services (DHS) include:
"Legal exception allowing multi-service group arrangements"
"Structural strategies for lawful K Street operation"
"Cited sources on Stark Law compliance"
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.