Statistical Analysis in Opioid Sedation Nursing Research
This paper analyzes three studies on opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression — a quantitative survey by Jungquist et al. (2014), a qualitative case report by Fleming et al. (2015), and a mixed-methods study by Dunwoody and Jungquist (2019) — focusing on their analytical approaches. The paper identifies the statistical methods used in each study, explains why no parametric or nonparametric hypothesis tests were conducted, and distinguishes between these two test types. It also evaluates how each study addressed reliability and validity, and concludes with a discussion of how the findings could inform monitoring practices in an orthopedic surgical hospital setting.
- Introduction: Overview of three opioid sedation studies analyzed
- Types of Statistical Tests Used: Descriptive methods and absence of hypothesis testing
- Parametric vs. Nonparametric Tests: Definitions, examples, and why neither type was used
- Reliability and Validity in the Studies: Each study's strengths and weaknesses in rigor
- Application to Orthopedic Surgical Practice: Clinical implications for hospital monitoring protocols
- References: Three cited nursing and medical research articles
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically addresses each analytical question across all three studies, maintaining a consistent comparative structure throughout.
- Clearly explains the distinction between parametric and nonparametric testing using concrete, accessible examples (t-test, Pearson's correlation, Spearman's correlation).
- Grounds the abstract methodological discussion in a real clinical context — an orthopedic surgical hospital — making the conclusions practically meaningful.
- Honestly acknowledges the limitations of each study, particularly the low response rate in the quantitative survey, strengthening its critical credibility.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative critical appraisal of research methodology across multiple study designs. Rather than summarizing each article independently, it evaluates them against shared criteria — statistical method, applicability, reliability, and validity — allowing the reader to see both the similarities and the differences in how each design handles evidence.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that identifies the three source studies and previews each analytical question to be addressed. It then moves through four substantive sections in order: statistical tests used and their rationale, applicability of those tests, the parametric/nonparametric distinction, and reliability and validity considerations. A final applied section connects the findings to orthopedic nursing practice. A reference list and summary table (Appendix) support the body.
Introduction
Three studies examining opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression serve as the basis for this paper: Dunwoody and Jungquist's (2019) mixed-methods study, Fleming, Voscopoulos, and George's (2015) qualitative study, and Jungquist, Willens, Dunwoody, Klingman, and Polomano's (2014) quantitative study. The data in each study communicate something unique. This paper identifies the statistical tests used within each article and analyzes why they were chosen; examines whether those tests were adequately or appropriately applied; explains the differences between parametric and nonparametric tests and why neither type was used in these studies; discusses whether reliability and validity were considered by the researchers; and provides a brief discussion of how these articles' findings could be applied in an orthopedic surgical hospital setting.
Types of Statistical Tests Used
In the quantitative study by Jungquist et al. (2014), descriptive statistics — primarily frequency measures — were used for analysis. The rationale was that descriptive statistics provided the best use of survey data for evaluating the monitoring practices of American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) members. No inferential statistical tests were conducted. In the qualitative study by Fleming et al. (2015), case description was used for analysis and, again, no statistical tests were conducted; the case study format was chosen because it would allow for greater insight into the issues surrounding the clinical problem. In the mixed-methods study by Dunwoody and Jungquist (2019), the matrix method was employed, but no statistical tests were conducted and no analysis method was clearly defined or described, nor was any rationale for the chosen method provided.
Applicability of the Statistical Tests
Because no statistical tests were conducted in any of the three studies — and only descriptive statistics were used in one of them, solely to measure frequencies — the question of test applicability is not relevant to these articles. Statistical tests were not used in any of the studies because no hypotheses were developed and there was nothing to test. Each study was designed for evaluation purposes only.
Parametric vs. Nonparametric Tests
A parametric test allows the researcher to gather broad data about averages within a sample population. One example is the t-test, which compares the averages of two sample groups. Another example is Pearson's correlation test, which measures the strength of the relationship between two variables. Parametric tests are used for hypothesis testing when the researcher makes assumptions about the distribution characteristics of a sample. For instance, if a researcher wants to determine how often a coin will land "heads" or "tails" in 500 tosses, the researcher might hypothesize that the distribution will be normal with minimal variance and then perform a t-test to calculate the actual average.
A nonparametric test, by contrast, is a hypothesis test that rests on no distributional assumptions. This type of test does not assume a particular distribution and measures only ordinal or nominal data, whereas parametric testing works with ratio and interval data. In other words, nonparametric tests are not used for evaluating non-metric independent variables. The values are specified by the researcher and are neither normally nor uniformly distributed. One well-known example of a nonparametric test is Spearman's rank correlation, which can determine rank correlation and reveal the relationship between two ordinal variables.
No parametric or nonparametric tests were conducted in any of the three studies assessed in this paper.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.