This paper examines swept wing technology, tracing its origins from German aeronautical research in the 1930s through its decisive role in World War Two and subsequent air conflicts. The paper analyzes the aerodynamic principles governing swept wing behavior at sub-sonic, transonic, and supersonic speeds, including the challenges of span-wise flow, wing tip stalls, and shock wave formation. It discusses the design considerations involved in determining angle of sweep, and compares the tactical and performance advantages of both rearward and forward sweep configurations. Notable aircraft such as the Grumman F-14 Tomcat and the Grumman X-29 are used to illustrate how engineers have addressed the inherent trade-offs of swept wing design. The paper concludes by assessing the broader technological impact of swept wings on aviation history and modern aircraft design.
The wing and wing structure play important roles in determining the limitations and performance characteristics of an aircraft. Wings that are swept behave differently from those that are not. Swept wing technology first appeared in the skies over Europe during World War Two, when German engineers, eager to gain air superiority, incorporated the design into their jet fighter prototypes. There are many advantages that can be derived from sweeping the wing on an aircraft, but most notable are the superior maneuverability and handling characteristics at higher speeds.
This is most apparent at sub-sonic and transonic speeds. The sound barrier was not crossed until after the war, in 1947, but the information gained through German and American efforts to experiment with wing sweep helped pave the way for supersonic aircraft in the future. The swept-wing design concept was introduced by German engineer Adolph Busemann in 1935 and was not employed in earnest until later (Platzer, 2010).
An aircraft's angle of sweep refers to the amount a wing is swept back or forward from a neutral position. Wing sweep can vary depending on where along the chord line it occurs. Some wings are swept back in segments, while others are swept entirely. The angle of sweep can be influenced by many other design factors, such as cockpit visibility and improved longitudinal stability. The former consideration was employed in the DC-3, and the latter has been employed in many other aircraft designs that incorporate delta-wing or fuselage-as-wing configurations (Platzer, 2010). This means that swept wing technology had a direct influence on the supersonic aircraft of the future, as it was first meaningfully experimented with during World War Two.
Speeds below the speed of sound are known as sub-sonic. Swept wing design at lower speeds produces an inherently inefficient and unstable aircraft. The more a wing is swept back, the less efficient it becomes at lower speeds, where air needs to move from front to back to create lift on an airfoil (Semionov, Kosinov, and Yermolaev, 2010). Aircraft with swept wings suffer from wing tip stalls far more commonly than those without, due to the different pressure gradients and isobars associated with swept wing design. The pressures on the wings created by airflow being directed outward become progressively less effective as a component of lift generation the slower a swept-wing aircraft flies (Hallion, 2011). This translates to higher stall speeds — especially at the wing tip — as well as poor handling characteristics at low speed.
The speed zone just before the speed of sound is known as the transonic zone. The transition from sub-sonic to supersonic is aerodynamically complex, because air flowing over the wing tends to build up into a wave-like structure just before the sound barrier is reached (Centennial Flight Commission [CFC], 2011). This wave adds drag to the wing and, in some cases, prevents certain designs from attaining supersonic speeds. Air compression upon a wing shape in this regime also directly influences stability at high speeds if it is not addressed through design features (Doig, Barber, and Neely, 2011). The aircraft requires more thrust to break the sound barrier, since the shock waves that create drag must be overcome by the wing and every other surface — canopy, nose, and so on. This means that wing design influences both the energy required to reach these speeds and the overall fuel economy of the aircraft.
Once a wing or airfoil goes supersonic, it generates lift through shock waves rather than through the pressure differentials associated with sub-sonic flight. Swept wing design is relatively inefficient unless it can transition smoothly from sub-sonic to supersonic relatively quickly, or unless it incorporates design features that allow the wing to behave as though part of the airflow is still sub-sonic while the aircraft reaches supersonic speeds (Hallion, 2011). In this way, the wing is shaped to control where the supersonic shockwave forms and is carried by the aircraft, further influencing the aircraft's energy and fuel requirements.
"Span-wise airflow inefficiency and design solutions"
"Tactical trade-offs from WWII through Cold War jets"
"Forward sweep configurations and notable aircraft"
"Swept wings' lasting influence on aviation history"
You’re 46% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.