This paper examines how teacher expectations influence student academic performance across elementary and secondary school settings. Drawing on research by Lane, Wehby, and Cooley (2006), Lynne, Pierson, and Givner (2003), and Zanna (1999), the paper identifies five key teacher expectations — timely completion of class and homework, positive communication skills, avoidance of disruptive behavior, punctuality, and development of critical thinking and assertiveness — and discusses how each can positively shape academic outcomes. The paper also addresses how the appropriate type of expectations varies by school risk level, socioeconomic context, and student needs, emphasizing that ongoing reevaluation of expectations is essential for sustained student success.
Although every classroom setting is unique, young learners in particular share the need to learn how to learn in a group setting that can be overcrowded and disruptive. To help address these challenging needs, studies have shown that the expectations teachers establish can provide the framework needed to manage classrooms and offer students an environment that is safe and conducive to learning. To gain further insight into how these expectations influence student academic performance, this paper describes five teacher expectations that can positively influence student academic achievement. These expectations include completing class and homework in a timely fashion in order to earn passing scores, developing positive communication skills, refraining from disruptive or violent behaviors, coming to class on time, and developing the critical thinking and assertiveness skills students will need to compete in the future.
The relationship between the type and level of teacher expectations and the corresponding academic outcomes is well established. Studies have shown time and again that the higher teachers set the bar, the higher students tend to respond academically — and vice versa. For instance, according to Zanna (1999), "Teacher expectations predict student achievement mainly because they are accurate, although they do lead to small self-fulfilling prophecies and biases" (p. 281). The self-fulfilling prophecy in educational settings has been a subject of ongoing scholarly interest, as it highlights how teacher beliefs can shape student outcomes in measurable ways.
The type of teacher expectations best suited for a given group of students will vary depending on a wide range of socioeconomic and jurisdictional factors. Lane, Wehby, and Cooley (2006) report that "teacher expectations at high-performing and low-risk schools may differ from teacher expectations at low-performing and high-risk schools" (p. 153). While these generalizations may hold true for many inner-city schools, there are exceptional models that are outperforming their suburban counterparts by promoting assertiveness and critical thinking skills (Lane et al., 2006).
Nevertheless, many inner-city schools are confronted with safety issues first and foremost, in order to provide a classroom environment that is safe and conducive to learning. In this regard, Lane and her associates add that "teachers working in schools with high rates of poverty, student absenteeism, disruptive behavior, student mobility, as well as low achievement scores may focus their attention on expectations related to minimizing disruptions to instruction (e.g., managing inappropriate behavior, coming to class on time)" (2006, p. 154). Research on urban education consistently highlights these structural challenges as central to understanding differential academic outcomes.
"Cooperation and assertion skills in elementary classrooms"
Elementary and secondary school teachers are confronted with a wide array of classroom settings full of young learners from diverse backgrounds with varying levels of educational and social skill learning needs. The research showed that because every classroom situation is unique, the type of teacher expectations in place will influence the academic outcomes achieved to the extent that they are aligned with the needs of the students. These needs will not only change from time to time — they will change over time — making ongoing reevaluation of which teacher expectations are most appropriate an essential element for student success.
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.