This paper surveys scholarly perspectives on several modern technologies and their societal impacts. It examines how computer-mediated communication affects intercultural exchange and child development, weighs competing arguments on ethanol fuel's environmental costs and benefits, and explores public opposition to nuclear power and the role of social trust in shaping risk perception. The paper also addresses fossil fuels' central role in industrial agriculture and the challenges of reducing that dependence. Drawing on a range of peer-reviewed sources, the paper presents paired counterarguments for each technology, illustrating that assessments of technological impact are rarely one-sided and require careful consideration of both benefits and drawbacks.
The use of modern communications technology is widely considered to be positive, reducing barriers to communication and facilitating powerful new forms of human interaction. Yet scholars frequently debate whether specific technologies deliver net benefits or net harms. This paper surveys competing scholarly perspectives across several domains — computer-mediated communication, children's technology use, ethanol fuel, nuclear power, and fossil fuels in agriculture — to illustrate that assessments of technology's impact on society are rarely straightforward and almost always require weighing significant trade-offs.
St. Amant (2002) argues the counterpoint to the dominant optimistic view of communications technology, contending that computer-mediated communication amplifies cultural rhetorical differences, and that there should be greater examination of its potential for conflict. Ma (1996), by contrast, notes that computer-mediated communication between Asian and North American college students offers tremendous promise with respect to breaking down the barriers that exist in face-to-face communication. He notes that increased communication between these groups allows them to learn about each other's communication styles and to adapt their listening, reading, and writing habits to suit their audience, thereby fostering a higher degree of mutual understanding between the two groups.
Adair and Barker (2013) argue that the use of smartphones and other similar technologies among young children is detrimental in a number of ways. In particular, they argue that family relationships suffer in an age when children engage more with their devices than with their parents and siblings. Leroy and De Leo (2008), however, note the value of computers in mediating communication with children who are on the autism spectrum. If nothing else, this finding demonstrates that not all computer use among children is as negative as portrayed by Adair and Barker, and that for some populations technology can serve a genuinely therapeutic purpose.
"Land use costs versus fossil fuel displacement benefits"
"Public opposition, social trust, and risk perception"
"Agricultural dependence on fossil fuels and future efficiency"
You’re 31% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.