This paper analyzes Oliver Stone's 2010 film Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps through the lens of the Three-Act Narrative formula. It traces the film's plot trajectory from the inciting incident—the crash of Keller Zabel's stock and Louis Zabel's subsequent suicide—through the false solution introduced by Jake's alliance with Gordon Gekko, to the resolution in Act 3. The paper also examines the internal and external conflicts of major and secondary characters, arguing that the film's unusual depth in developing secondary characters, particularly Gordon Gekko, strengthens its central message about honesty, family, and moral redemption.
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: a theoretical model (Three-Act Narrative structure) is used as a lens to evaluate a specific cultural artifact. Each structural element—inciting incident, false solution, lowest moment, true resolution—is mapped onto precise moments in the film, showing how abstract narrative theory operates in a concrete example. This technique is common in film studies and communications courses.
The paper opens with a thesis statement identifying the Three-Act framework, then moves chronologically through the film's structure. It addresses the inciting incident and character conflicts first, followed by the false solution and its Act 2 consequences, then the reversal leading to Act 3's resolution. A final paragraph steps back to assess the film's departures from convention and offer a critical evaluation. This mirrors the film's own narrative arc, reinforcing the argument through structural alignment.
Oliver Stone's 2010 film Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps follows the standard Three-Act Narrative formula. This paper traces how the film's plot trajectory takes shape according to the plot point structure stipulated by that formula, examining the inciting incident, the false solution, the protagonist's lowest moment, and the final resolution.
While the film uses several conflicts to propel the storyline, the major conflict that serves as the inciting incident is introduced in Act 1 at the 16:00 mark, when main character Jacob "Jake" Moore watches Keller Zabel's stock crash. This incident causes Jake's mentor, Louis Zabel, to kill himself in despair. Before throwing himself in front of a subway train, however, Zabel advises Jake to have children and to love them — advice that serves as the film's ultimate message and becomes the ultimate goal for Jake as his character and the storyline progress.
Most of the characters are engaged in both an internal and an external struggle. Louis Zabel is contemplating retirement from a business he no longer understands when his enterprise collapses beneath him, leaving him nothing to stand on. He resolves his internal and external struggle through suicide. Louis's death in turn creates an internal struggle in Jake. Jake wants to avenge his mentor's death, resurrect his own career, and patch things up with his fiancée Winnie and her father Gordon Gekko. To do so, he believes he must practice deception: he deceives his new employer Bretton James, the man responsible for bringing down Keller Zabel; he deceives Winnie by meeting secretly with her father; and he deceives himself by thinking he is cunning enough to hold everything together. While he struggles externally to stay afloat in the world of Wall Street, he struggles internally to balance his desire for power and wealth with his desire to be decent and honest with Winnie.
There is also the internal and external struggle of Gordon Gekko, who upon his release from prison finds that no one is there to pick him up. He has been forgotten and abandoned by friends and family, and he sincerely longs to be reunited with his daughter. At the same time, he recognizes that he can manipulate Jake into retrieving his daughter's trust fund and using it to start up his own business. His internal and external struggle mirrors Jake's closely. Gordon's daughter Winnie, on the other hand, struggles internally with her conflicting feelings toward her father. She wants both to hate him for his past actions and to forgive him, yet she fears being betrayed again. Externally, she struggles to promote her news website — a platform that will later prove instrumental in bringing down Bretton James.
A false solution to Jake's problems is introduced roughly one-quarter of the way through the film, between the 29:00 and 35:00 marks, when Jake meets Gordon. Jake sees Gordon as a sort of replacement mentor. He admires Gordon's finesse and hopes that by making a deal with him, he can learn how to avenge Louis and happily reunite Winnie with her father. The consequences of this false solution form the central drama of Act 2. Jake realizes he has been duped by Gordon; Winnie's trust fund is never transferred to the intended charity (at the 1:40:00 mark); and Jake's tenure with Bretton comes to an early end. Winnie breaks up with Jake as a consequence of his having concealed his meetings with Gordon. No one is happy — except, apparently, Gordon and Bretton, both of whom remain at large and in control.
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.