The Times of Harvey Milk: Documentary Analysis
This paper analyzes Rob Epstein's 1984 documentary The Times of Harvey Milk, exploring its production techniques, narrative structure, and role as both a personal memorial and political document. The paper examines how Epstein and his collaborators crafted an emotionally driven, four-act structure focused on Milk's brief career as a San Francisco city supervisor, his assassination, and the aftermath. It also considers the film's use of archival footage, Harvey Fierstein's narration, audio-visual qualities, and its broader cultural significance as an advocacy documentary addressing LGBT civil rights and the intersection of religious fundamentalism and freedom of expression.
- Overview and Context: Film's purpose, reception, and political framing
- Production Approach and Collaborative Vision: Collaborative team, four-act structure, emotional goals
- Narrative Structure and Pacing: Screen time allocation and three-act film structure
- Archival Footage, Narration, and Tone: Fierstein's narration and Castro District community
- Technical Qualities: Image and Sound: 16mm image grain, audio mix, and Blu-ray quality
- Cultural Significance and Legacy: Documentary's lasting cultural and political impact
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates multiple source types — interviews, DVD commentary, film reviews, and academic articles — to support its analysis from several angles.
- It balances discussion of content (the film's political and emotional messaging) with technical observations (image quality, audio mix, narration style), giving the analysis a well-rounded character.
- The paper situates the film within its broader sociocultural context, connecting it to LGBT civil rights history and San Francisco's Castro District community.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source-integrated film analysis: rather than simply summarizing the documentary, the student draws on primary sources (director interviews, DVD audio commentary) alongside secondary reviews to build an argument about the film's intentional design choices and their emotional and political effects. This shows how documentary technique and advocacy purpose can be analyzed together.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of the film's reception and purpose, then moves into production context and the collaborative team. It examines narrative structure and pacing decisions before turning to the role of narration and archival footage in shaping tone. The final sections address technical qualities of the Criterion Blu-ray release and close with observations on the film's cultural legacy and lasting significance.
Overview and Context
Among the most prominent feature documentaries exploring American gay life, Rob Epstein's The Times of Harvey Milk is a work of advocacy, carrying Harvey Milk's message of equality and hope to a wider audience. The documentary was envisioned as an emotional narrative accessible to both straight and homosexual viewers. Its production was deeply collaborative; filmmakers, advocates, and journalists from diverse communities contributed their voices and stories, alongside archival footage, critical feedback, and financial backing (Esther, 2009).
While The Times of Harvey Milk was not a major box office success, its theatrical release propelled the film — through critical acclaim and awards — into a long-running non-theatrical circuit. Despite being one of the most celebrated documentaries of recent decades, the film has more often been received as a political event rather than a cinematic one, and that perception largely persists today (Esther, 2009).
Epstein, explaining his position within the film in a 2009 interview, stated that his approach carried no political agenda. His intent was to address the subject's humanity and trust that the rest would follow (Esther, 2009).
Production Approach and Collaborative Vision
Epstein's core team — which included Bex, Hoffman, Schmiechen, and Reid — initially planned the project as a one-hour documentary built around four acts corresponding roughly to an introduction, development, and close: a distilled account of Harvey Milk's roots and identity; the campaign labeled "No on 6"; the assassination; and Dan White's trial along with the ensuing "White Night" riots that followed the verdict (New Yorker DVD Audio commentary, 2004).
Epstein has stated that the entire documentary was designed to move viewers emotionally. The team worked diligently to recreate the genuine emotions people felt at the time, with the goal of giving contemporary viewers an equivalent experience. While the film is relatively conventional from a stylistic standpoint — featuring biographical photographs, talking-head interviews, abundant archival footage, and narration by Harvey Fierstein — its structure is rather unexpected (wordscreenpark, 2010).
The tale was constructed through deliberate juxtaposition. Epstein identified three key elements: news footage, used as such and preserving TV logos and reporters' names; archival documentary footage, offering a broader perspective on the events depicted; and original interviews conducted over the four years following the events (New Yorker DVD Audio commentary, 2004).
Narrative Structure and Pacing
Surprisingly little screen time is devoted to Harvey Milk's childhood and adolescence in this 88-minute documentary. Just seventeen minutes in, Milk has already been elected; his assassination appears at the 53-minute mark. The result is two-fold: the directors can maintain a conventional three-act film structure, and the majority of the documentary's running time is concentrated on Milk's eleven-month career as city supervisor of San Francisco (wordscreenpark, 2010).
As one subject in the documentary observes, Milk represented "something more than just him." This sincere and carefully constructed film makes that point abundantly clear. While Milk's personality is vividly present throughout, the documentary's primary concern is not the individual but the societal forces he embodied. Robert Epstein, co-director of the equally affecting Word Is Out, reflects on how Milk symbolized one segment of society while his killer, Dan White, symbolized another. Dan White was a disgruntled former supervisor who shot both Harvey Milk and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone in 1978. Epstein tracks the conflict between these two figures — a conflict so inherently dramatic that The Times of Harvey Milk can rely on a plain, unadorned style without sacrificing emotional force or momentum (New York Times, 1984).
References
Bailey, J. (2011, March 14). The Times of Harvey Milk: The Criterion Collection (Blu-ray). Retrieved from DVD Talk: http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/47235/times-of-harvey-milk-the/
Esther, J. (2009). The Times of Rob Epstein, Filmmaker. The Gay & Lesbian Review, 16(4), 45.
Heath, G. (2011, March 25). The Times of Harvey Milk. Retrieved from Slant Magazine: http://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/review/the-times-of-harvey-milk-1965
New York Times. (1984, October 27). Film: 'The Times Of Harvey Milk,' A Documentary. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/27/arts/film-the-times-of-harvey-milk-a-documentary.html
New Yorker DVD Audio commentary. (2004). Epstein: "From very early — from when we started writing grant proposals — we had defined a four-act structure."
Wordscreenpark. (2010). The Times Of Harvey Milk. Retrieved from wordscreenpark:
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.