This essay compares Tom Joad from John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath and Frederic Henry from Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms as modern tragic heroes. Set against the backdrops of the Great Depression and wartime Europe respectively, both protagonists are shaped — and ultimately diminished — by forces beyond their control. The essay examines their shared tendencies toward disillusionment, violence, and moral ambiguity, arguing that their tragedy stems not from classical hubris but from a kind of personal impotence: an inability to locate identity, purpose, or ethical direction amid overwhelming social and political circumstances.
The paper demonstrates parallel comparative analysis: rather than discussing each novel separately, the writer continuously juxtaposes Tom Joad and Frederic Henry within the same analytical frame. This technique allows the argument to accumulate across paragraphs, with each section adding a new dimension — disillusionment, violence, moral failure — to the central claim about modern tragic heroism.
The essay opens by establishing the historical settings and introducing the shared thesis. It then develops thematic comparisons across three core areas: the protagonists' disillusionment and identity struggles, their acts of violence and what those reveal about character, and their broader victimization by social forces. The conclusion synthesizes these threads, reaffirming both characters as amoral modern tragic heroes shaped more by circumstance than by innate character flaws.
John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath and Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms both take place during tumultuous social and political climates. The Grapes of Wrath is set against the backdrop of the Great Depression and therefore carries the added dimension of economic collapse and widespread poverty. A Farewell to Arms is set during wartime Europe, on the Italian front during the First World War. Against these similar yet distinct backdrops, each novel's protagonist demonstrates particular strengths and weaknesses. Tom Joad of The Grapes of Wrath and Frederic Henry of A Farewell to Arms are both products — if not outright victims — of their circumstances. They are both tragic heroes, but not in the classical sense, because hubris is not their fundamental weakness. Instead, these male protagonists suffer from a kind of impotence that prevents them from reaching their full potential.
Both Tom and Henry are tragic in part because they never discover what makes them happy in the first place. Henry is a melancholy protagonist from the opening pages of A Farewell to Arms. He seeks personal fulfillment and never achieves it. His romantic relationship with Catherine seems to function primarily as an escape from his failure as a soldier; sexuality is one of the only avenues through which Henry can assert his masculine identity. "When I could not see her there I was feeling lonely and hollow" (Hemingway, Chapter 7). Disillusionment is central to both protagonists' personalities. For Henry, it stems from the war; for Tom, it stems from the failure of the American Dream to materialize for his family.
Both Tom and Henry have killed a man, and these acts of homicide define their characters — yet neither learns anything from his moral transgression. Tom kills because he needs to avenge his friend Jim Casey, but also because he possesses no political or social power through which to seek justice in a legitimate way. Henry kills a man simply because that man failed to show him respect. If Henry had been confident enough to maintain his own self-respect, he would not have needed to resort to murder.
Both men are victims of their respective eras: Tom of the economic depression and the disenfranchisement it produces, and Henry of the war and the nihilism it instills. A nihilistic sentiment pervades the inner lives of both characters. Tom kills to avenge Jim Casey's death, whereas Henry kills because a man wounded his pride and sense of authority. In both cases, the men kill to assert their manliness and personal power — because they have not channeled their energy, creativity, or anger anywhere else. As Steinbeck writes, "Man, unlike any other thing organic or inorganic in the universe, grows beyond his work, walks up the stairs of his concepts, emerges ahead of his accomplishments" (Steinbeck, Chapter 14).
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.