This essay examines Tristan Harris's argument in "Transforming the Attention Economy," in which Harris contends that smartphone and social media technologies are deliberately engineered to exploit human psychology, eroding attention spans, empathy, and democratic discourse. The paper surveys Harris's critique of the advertising-driven business model that creates conflicts of interest between technology companies and user well-being, his proposed alternative models such as subscription and data cooperative structures, and his call for ethical design guidelines, algorithmic transparency, and stronger user data controls. The essay concludes by emphasizing Harris's warning that without collective action, Big Tech will continue to accumulate unchecked influence over individuals and governments.
Tristan Harris argues that everything in our world has been downgraded as a result of our technology addiction — our attention spans, our empathy, our sense of truth, and our sense of common connection with others. Because of technology, smartphones, social media, and infinite scrolling, our self-control has been obliterated and we no longer know when to stop.
In "Transforming the Attention Economy," Harris argues that technology companies are using persuasive techniques to capture and hold our attention, leading to negative consequences for society and democracy. He suggests that we need to re-examine the way technology is designed and used to ensure it serves the public interest. Harris proposes that technology can be made to better align with human values and reduce the negative effects of attention capture, such as the spread of misinformation, polarization, and addiction. He calls for greater transparency and accountability from technology companies, as well as a shift in focus from maximizing engagement to promoting well-being.
According to Harris, technology today is so addictive because it is designed to hijack our attention and manipulate our behavior by preying on our fears, insecurities, and vulnerabilities. These tactics — including the use of sophisticated algorithms, notifications, and endless content feeds — are used to keep people hooked to their devices, scrolling through newsfeeds or engaging with targeted advertisements.
Harris also discusses how the business model of technology companies, which is based on advertising and data collection, drives the need to capture our attention and manipulate our behavior. He argues that this model creates a conflict of interest with users' well-being and democratic values. The very structure that funds these platforms incentivizes keeping users engaged at any cost, regardless of the psychological or social harm caused.
Harris suggests alternative business models — such as subscription-based or data cooperative models — which would align the interests of technology companies with those of users and society as a whole. These alternatives would reduce the financial pressure to maximize engagement and instead reward platforms for genuinely serving their users.
Essentially, Harris believes that we all have a role to play in shaping the technology landscape. By being more mindful of our own use of technology and by supporting alternative technologies and business models, we can help create a more positive future. However, this depends upon us taking back control of our minds, our wills, and our lives.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.