This paper examines two related questions in macroeconomics. First, it identifies the stage of the U.S. economic cycle as of early 2013 by analyzing leading indicators including GDP growth rates, unemployment figures, and the consumer price index, concluding that the economy was in an early recovery phase. Second, it critically evaluates the traditional use of GDP as a proxy for national welfare, highlighting limitations such as unequal wealth distribution and the absence of social indicators. The paper introduces alternative measures, including the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), as more comprehensive tools for assessing citizen well-being beyond aggregate output.
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: it establishes conceptual definitions from academic sources, then uses empirical indicators to match real-world conditions to those definitions. This technique — theory-first, evidence-second — is a hallmark of undergraduate economics writing and gives the argument a structured, falsifiable quality.
The paper is divided into two parts. The first part defines the four stages of the business cycle and uses 2012–2013 U.S. data (GDP, unemployment, CPI) to place the economy in the early recovery stage. The second part critiques GDP as a welfare proxy, notes its distributional blind spots using China as an example, and introduces the ISEW as a more socially sensitive alternative. The paper is concise and primarily analytical in tone.
The economy moves in cycles. There are different models, but all are characterized by periods of growth followed by periods of contraction (Sorensen and Whitta-Jacobsen, 2010). The different approaches to recession may define the various stages using different terms, but they tend to reflect similar phases. Most models identify the first stage as a boom — also referred to as growth or late recovery — followed by a slowdown (or early recession), then a recession (or full recession), and finally a recovery (or early recovery) (Schiff and Schiff, 2010). To assess the current stage of the economic cycle, it is necessary to examine current economic performance and align it with the characteristics of each stage.
If the economy were in a boom or growth phase, there would be strong GDP growth, high aggregate demand, and expansion of both output and the labor market; employment and interest rates may also be elevated (Sorensen and Whitta-Jacobsen, 2010). In a slowdown, or early recession, the previous growth decelerates but the trend is still one of growth — just at a slower rate (Sorensen and Whitta-Jacobsen, 2010). A full recession is the stage where national output declines and the economy contracts, with falling aggregate demand, rising unemployment, low interest rates, and declining consumer and business confidence; it is usually characterized by at least two consecutive quarters of negative growth (Sorensen and Whitta-Jacobsen, 2010). Recovery, or early recovery, is characterized by a turnaround from a contracting economy to one experiencing positive growth, although that growth may be highly constrained, and the rate of recovery can vary (Sorensen and Whitta-Jacobsen, 2010). The different stages are not totally separate — each merges gradually into the next.
Looking at the U.S. economy in 2013, several leading indicators can be assessed to determine which stage is most closely matched. The primary leading indicator is GDP. The GDP for the fourth quarter of 2012 is estimated to have increased by 0.1% over the preceding quarter (BEA, 2013). This was a slight decrease from the prior quarter, which recorded GDP growth of 3.1% (BEA, 2013). Overall, for 2012 the GDP grew by 2.2% compared to the previous year. This indicates a low rate of growth, but the trend matters: in 2011 the growth rate was 1.8%, which was itself an improvement on 2010 (BEA, 2013). There is thus a slow rate of growth that appears to be showing gradual improvement over previous years.
The unemployment rate for January 2013 was 7.9%, up slightly from 7.8% in December 2012. This appears to be a deterioration; however, it is typical for unemployment to increase in January as seasonal jobs disappear. Comparing year-over-year, the rate in January 2012 was 8.3% and in January 2010 it was 9.1%, demonstrating that unemployment is decreasing slowly (BLS, 2013). The consumer price index also shows an increase, rising by 1.6% in 2012. Overall, there is an improvement from the period that had been defined as a recession. Growth is slow and constrained but expected to improve further; therefore, the current economic stage is that of a recovery, or early recovery.
The traditional method of assessing economic growth is by measuring GDP, with the underlying assumption that growth in GDP corresponds to an increase in welfare — typically expressed as GDP per capita. The basic idea is that when an economy is growing, the benefits will reach all segments of that economy: rising output leads to increasing wages and higher tax revenues. The theories of the multiplier effect and the trickle-down effect are also assumed to increase welfare throughout society, even if not all members benefit proportionately. Furthermore, increased government income may be used to improve citizens' welfare through higher spending on areas such as healthcare and education, both of which directly affect living standards.
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.