U.S. Healthcare System: Structure, Access, and Disparities
This paper examines the structure and funding of the United States healthcare system, which operates as a hybrid model combining federal, state, and private financing. It outlines the three levels of care — primary, secondary, and tertiary — explaining the role each plays in patient care. The paper addresses whether U.S. healthcare is universal, arguing that it is not, and compares American out-of-pocket and insurance spending to peer nations. It also summarizes the goals of the Healthy People 2020 initiative and reviews a scholarly article on persistent racial and ethnic healthcare disparities, connecting those disparities to broader systemic inequities in access and outcomes.
- Introduction: A Hybrid Healthcare System: Defines the U.S. system as a hybrid funding model
- Levels of Care: Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary: Explains three tiers of medical care delivery
- Is U.S. Healthcare Universal?: Argues U.S. healthcare is not a guaranteed right
- Public vs. Private: Funding and Spending Comparisons: Compares U.S. spending to other nations
- Healthy People 2020: Outlines national health targets and goals
- Healthcare Disparities: A Summary: Reviews racial and ethnic healthcare disparity research
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete funding statistics (12% state/local, 38% federal, 50% private) to ground the abstract concept of a "hybrid" system in real data.
- Structures the discussion logically, moving from how care is organized (levels) to who pays for it (funding) to who is excluded (access and disparities).
- Connects the Healthy People 2020 policy goals directly to the scholarly article on disparities, demonstrating awareness of how policy and research intersect.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of international comparison as an analytical tool. Rather than evaluating U.S. healthcare in isolation, it benchmarks American spending against peer nations (the Netherlands, France, and the United Kingdom), making the argument for systemic reform more persuasive and data-driven.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definitional overview of the hybrid funding model, then systematically describes the three tiers of medical care. It shifts to normative analysis — asking whether the system is universal — before presenting comparative spending data. The final two sections connect government policy objectives (Healthy People 2020) to documented disparities in access, providing a policy-oriented conclusion grounded in peer-reviewed literature.
Introduction: A Hybrid Healthcare System
The United States healthcare system is far more than a simple health insurance program with multiple contributors. Neither is the government solely responsible for its funding — making it, in effect, a hybrid health insurance system. The funding pattern illustrates this well: in 2010, 12% of funding came from local and state coffers, 38% from the federal government, and 50% from private funds. Regardless of the source of funding, most people seek care from private health facilities (Dorning, 2014).
Levels of Care: Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary
Primary Care
Individuals seek primary care for nearly all the health concerns they encounter. For instance, one may seek primary care for common afflictions such as viral fever, bacterial infection, or influenza. Individuals also seek primary care when they suspect a broken bone, have a skin rash, or experience a sore muscle. Primary care providers (PCPs) may be physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners (NPs). Primary care also encompasses coordinating care, including providing health advice and making referrals to the next level of care.
Secondary Care
At the secondary care level, the patient is treated by a more specialized professional for a specific medical problem, usually upon referral from a primary care provider. Such an individual is referred to as a specialist. Specialists may include oncologists, who address cancer, or cardiologists, who focus on heart conditions. A patient is referred to secondary care only when primary care cannot adequately address the required solution. It is functionally important for primary care providers to coordinate patient care when a patient is seeing multiple specialists simultaneously.
Tertiary Care
Tertiary care represents the highest level of specialty care available in healthcare facilities. Individuals reach this level when their cases require a degree of specialization beyond what primary and secondary care can provide. The devices and equipment used at this level are highly specialized and expensive. The professionals working at this level have years of experience and expertise, possessing the skills to perform complex procedures and interventions such as neurosurgeries and open-heart surgeries (Torrey, 2016).
Is U.S. Healthcare Universal?
U.S. healthcare is not universal. In other words, it does not guarantee basic healthcare to its citizens. Health in the United States is treated as a commercial product — available primarily to those who can afford it — rather than as a public or social good. In the largely insurance-based U.S. healthcare system, over forty million citizens who cannot afford healthcare insurance are deprived of care at various levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Healthcare in the U.S. is therefore not a basic right, and a large portion of the population has no meaningful access to it.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.