This paper examines why the United States has consistently achieved higher GDP growth than the major economies of the European Union — particularly France, Germany, and Italy — since 1982. Using productivity per capita as the primary lens, the analysis identifies key structural factors driving the gap: longer working years, higher tertiary education enrollment, lower employer social costs, shorter unemployment benefits, and lower trade protectionism in the U.S. The paper also considers how government policy choices, including tax burdens, employment rigidities, and social welfare spending, reinforce these differences, and briefly examines reform efforts in the United Kingdom and France as potential models for reversing Europe's productivity disadvantage.
The fundamental question addressed in this analysis is: why has U.S. GDP growth been consistently higher than that of the major economic powers of the European Union since 1982? A secondary question follows naturally: why is the employment rate — more accurately, the percentage of people of working age who are employed — so much higher in the United States than in the major countries of Western Europe?
This analysis focuses primarily on France, Germany, and Italy, with some reference to the United Kingdom. These three countries were selected for three reasons: (1) they represent the largest GDPs in the European Union; (2) their economic policies have been broadly similar; and (3) focusing on them avoids skewing the analysis with the newly emerging economic powers in Europe — including Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Although the growth of these newer economies has been considerably higher than the rest of the EU, they started from a much smaller base and therefore represent a different dynamic.
The primary focus of this analysis is relative productivity per person, supplemented by an examination of population growth and tax policies. Although productivity per person can be expressed fairly simply as GDP per capita, its underlying components help economists understand the root causes of observed differences between countries.
The average productivity per person in the United States is $41,640, measured in 2006 (Economist). That figure compares to the GDP per person and purchasing power parity (PPP) GDP per person figures for the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy as recorded in the same source. PPP represents the equivalent value of goods and services that can be purchased with a given income, adjusting for differences in price levels across countries. The Economist ratings are taken as absolute dollar figures — for example, $36,850 for the UK — multiplied by the PPP coefficient (in that case, 0.798) to arrive at the PPP equivalent.
This difference in productivity per person has been maintained and even widened since 1982, when the employment rate in the United States began its sustained climb. As purchasing power parity comparisons make clear, the gap between American and major European living standards is substantial, and the structural factors behind it are deeply embedded in each country's policy environment.
Several interconnected factors explain why U.S. productivity per person consistently outpaces that of France, Germany, and Italy.
More years worked in the U.S. The average retirement age in the United States is 65, whereas it ranges between 57 in Italy and 62 in Germany. In Germany, the average college graduate completes their degree at age 27. This means the typical German worker has only 35 working years, compared to the average American's 43 years — a difference of roughly 38% more working time for U.S. college graduates.
Higher educational attainment in the U.S. Germany enrolls only 46% of its students in tertiary (college-level) institutions, compared to 72% in the United States. Similar gaps exist in France and Italy. The United States also spends 2.7% of GDP on education, compared to less than 2% in these European countries (Economist). Higher educational attainment directly supports productivity growth by expanding the share of the workforce capable of performing higher-value work.
Lower employment costs in the U.S. The social costs associated with employment average over 40% in Germany, Italy, and France, whereas they are less than half that figure in the United States (Hahn). These costs make it significantly more expensive for European firms to hire workers. One consequence is that the unemployment rate in the aforementioned European countries is roughly double that of the United States (Economist). Beyond unemployment, the overall employment rate in the U.S. is considerably higher than in Europe, meaning a much larger share of the working-age population is actively in the workforce.
Weaker incentives to return to work in Europe. In the United States, unemployment benefits generally last only six months. In Europe, they last two years or longer. This extended support reduces the urgency for unemployed Europeans to re-enter the labor market, with a measurable detrimental impact on overall productivity and workforce participation.
Greater protectionism in Europe. European nations maintain higher average import tariffs and non-tariff barriers than the United States. As a result, protected industries — from steel to agricultural products — face less competitive pressure to raise productivity to world-market levels (Stokes). Trade protectionism of this kind insulates domestic producers from the productivity discipline imposed by global competition.
"Tax burdens, social costs, and labor market rules"
"Blair, Thatcher, and Sarkozy reform strategies"
Europe's largest economies suffer from higher barriers to new company formation, to employment, and to the changes needed to allow greater flexibility in hiring employees and creating new businesses. Europe's high social costs benefit those who already hold a job or are receiving unemployment support, but they pose significant obstacles for those who are unemployed and seeking to re-enter the workforce. The cumulative effect of these inefficiencies and elevated costs amounts to a permanent economic penalty for Europeans relative to Americans.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.