Verizon Strategy Analysis: Success Factors and Financial Projections
This paper examines Verizon Communications' strategic and financial outlook across three dimensions. It first analyzes the company's differentiation strategy as a source of competitive advantage, exploring how investments in infrastructure, employee training, and service quality support premium pricing and customer loyalty. Next, it identifies non-financial factors — including human capital development, technology adoption, and corporate reputation — that Verizon could leverage for long-term growth. The paper then discusses key risks, such as price-based competition, employee unrest, and revenue concentration in wireless services. Finally, it presents hypothetical three-year net income projections (2017–2019) grounded in analysis of historical performance, market trends, and strategic initiatives, along with best- and worst-case scenarios for 2017.
- Differentiation Strategy and Competitive Advantage: Verizon's quality-focused strategy drives premium pricing
- Capitalizing on Non-Financial Factors: Human capital, technology, and reputation as growth levers
- Key Risks to Verizon's Performance: Price competition, labor unrest, and revenue concentration risks
- Financial Projections for 2017–2019: Hypothetical net income growth rates over three years
- Best and Worst Case Scenario Analysis: 2017 projections adjusted for political and operational risk
- Conclusion: Projections are hypothetical but grounded in real analysis
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly separates strategic analysis into distinct, logically ordered subsections — differentiation strategy, non-financial factors, risks, and projections — making the argument easy to follow.
- Grounds qualitative strategic claims in specific, real-world evidence such as Verizon's DEI rating, the 2016 worker strike, and network performance rankings.
- Appropriately acknowledges the limitations of its own financial projections, noting they are hypothetical but grounded in verified company data and trend analysis.
- Integrates appendix data (quarterly performance, best/worst case tables) with narrative analysis rather than presenting numbers in isolation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied strategic analysis using a generic strategy framework (Porter's differentiation strategy) and links it to both financial outcomes and non-financial performance drivers. It also shows how to construct scenario-based financial projections — adjusting base estimates by basis points in response to identified risks — while maintaining transparency about the assumptions involved.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two main sections: success factors (covering strategy, non-financial factors, and risks) and projections (covering base-case, current-year, and scenario analysis). Each subsection builds on the previous one, moving from strategic diagnosis to financial forecast. The appendix tables anchor the projection narrative with actual and estimated figures across 2015–2019.
Differentiation Strategy and Competitive Advantage
Verizon, like any other business seeking to thrive in an increasingly competitive marketplace, has in place financial and strategic priorities that guide its operational and strategic decisions. To ensure competitive advantage, Verizon employs a differentiation strategy. This strategy is particularly valuable as the business seeks to keep various external forces that may affect its profitability at bay. In adopting this approach, the company appears determined not only to defend its market share but also to enhance its brand image. Verizon's key selling point is quality — it aims both to win new customers and to retain existing ones.
It should be noted that the company ensures this generic strategy is adopted across all its business units and activities. Verizon Wireless advertisements, for instance, largely focus on the quality of the company's wireless services. According to Clegg, Schweitzer, and Whittle (2016), the company has also heavily invested in infrastructure and continues to embrace new technologies to sustain its high-quality narrative. Verizon's personnel — and particularly its customer service representatives — are also well trained, with the company periodically implementing training programs to further enhance staff competency.
To successfully deploy this strategy, Verizon must, among other things, engage in customer accounting through cost analysis and customer profitability analysis, as well as competitor accounting via competitor performance appraisal and cost assessment (Clegg, Schweitzer, and Whittle, 2016). As a result of this strategy, Verizon is able to charge a premium for its services, meaning it earns more than competitors covering the same market ground. The superior quality of the company's services also enhances customer loyalty, with loyal customers choosing to remain with Verizon rather than switching to competitors.
References
Clegg, S. R., Schweitzer, J., & Whittle, A. (2016). Strategy: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Deloitte. (2016). Global Mobile Consumer Survey: US Edition. Retrieved from
Hill, C. W., Schilling, M. A., & Jones, G. R. (2016). Strategic Management: Theory and Cases — An Integrated Approach (12th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Scheiber, N., & Chen, B. X. (2016). In Verizon strike, blue-collar stress hits the sidewalk. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/business/verizon-workers-strike.html
Verizon. (2017). Our company. Retrieved from http://www.verizon.com/about/
Appendix
Verizon's Consolidated Net Income — Historical and Projected (in $'000s)
2015: $17,879,000 | 2016: $13,127,000 | % Change: (36.20%) | 2017 (Projected): $15,096,000 | 2018 (Projected): $17,360,000 | 2019 (Projected): $16,839,000
Quarterly Performance (in $'000s)
2017 Q2: $4,362,000 | 2017 Q1: $3,450,000 | % Change: 20.91% | 2016 Q4: $4,495,000 | 2016 Q3: $3,620,000 | % Change: 19.47%
Best/Worst Case Scenario for 2017 (in $'000s)
2015: $17,879,000 | 2016: $13,127,000 | % Change: (36.20%) | Best Case 2017: $15,752,000 | Worst Case 2017: $14,964,000
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.