Problems and Solutions at the Veterans Health Administration
This paper examines the systemic problems confronting the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the nation's largest integrated health care network. Despite a budget exceeding $92.3 billion annually, the VHA continues to struggle with declining care quality, ambiguous policies, inadequate oversight, IT challenges, and insufficient staff training. Drawing on findings from the U.S. Government Accountability Office and the Joint Commission, the paper identifies five high-risk areas undermining timely and quality veteran care, then outlines seven concrete recommendations — ranging from improved incident documentation to zero-tolerance policies for patient abuse — aimed at transforming the VHA's organizational culture into one of accountability and continuous improvement.
- Introduction: VHA's national role and paper's purpose
- Review and Analysis: Systemic VHA problems despite growing budget
- High-Risk Areas Identified by the GAO: Five GAO-identified barriers to quality care
- Recommended Solutions for Improving VHA Care: Seven actionable reforms for VHA accountability
- Conclusion: Urgent call for substantive VHA reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in credible institutional sources — the GAO, the Joint Commission, and the VA itself — lending authority to its policy claims without overstating the evidence.
- It uses numbered lists strategically to present both identified problems and proposed solutions, making the argument easy to follow and compare.
- The paper maintains a consistent advocacy tone throughout, framing the issue as a moral obligation to veterans while keeping the analysis grounded in administrative and budgetary realities.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of government and institutional reports as primary evidence in a policy analysis essay. Rather than relying on secondary commentary, the author cites GAO findings and Joint Commission standards directly to validate claims about systemic failure, then pivots cleanly from problem identification to solution recommendation — a standard structure in public administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with contextual framing that establishes the VHA's national importance, followed by a review-and-analysis section that presents documented problems with budgetary context. A focused subsection enumerates the GAO's five high-risk areas, while the next section offers seven actionable recommendations. A brief conclusion ties the urgency back to the ongoing policy environment. The structure mirrors a standard policy brief, moving from diagnosis to prescription.
Introduction
The chances are good that most Americans have either received health care services from the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) directly, or from a physician who received training at a VA teaching facility. This likelihood stems from the fact that the VA not only operates the nation's largest integrated health care network, but also provides vital training opportunities for more than half of the doctors practicing in the United States today. Given the critical role the VA plays in the nation's health care system, identifying constraints to the quality of care provided by VA practitioners — and opportunities to improve them — represents a timely and valuable enterprise. To this end, this paper provides a brief overview of the VA and the wide array of challenges it faces in delivering high-quality patient care today and in the future, followed by recommended solutions to help achieve that outcome.
Review and Analysis
The VA's VHA operates the largest integrated health care system in the United States, providing medical services of all types at 1,255 health care facilities (About VHA, 2020). This total includes 170 tertiary medical centers and 1,074 community-based outpatient clinics, which together treat more than nine million enrolled veteran patients each year (About VHA, 2020). This figure means that the VHA handles tens of millions of individual patient visits annually, and it is not surprising that any organization with such a massive caseload would experience some problems from time to time. The problems at the VHA, however, are longstanding and systemic, and many have intensified in severity in recent years despite having been made key organizational priorities.
When something is made a priority, it is by definition supposed to improve — so it is clear that there is something wrong with the VHA that defies easy analysis and simple solutions. First and foremost, and notwithstanding the critical role the entire VA is playing in fighting the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, a fundamental part of the challenges facing the VHA at present and for the foreseeable future is the projected sustained increase in its patient care load. Increasing numbers of elderly veterans are requiring intensive care for age-related disorders. Moreover, assuming they receive appropriate care, the growing population of elderly veterans can be expected to live far longer than their counterparts from just a few decades ago, meaning that a disproportionate percentage of the VA's annual budget will be needed through mid-century at least. The results of a comprehensive study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that "the VA faces a growing demand for its health care services — partly due to the needs of an aging veteran population" (Managing risks and improving VA health care, 2020, para. 3).
Despite the VA's budget having doubled during the period from 2006 to its current level of more than $92.3 billion each year, analysts expect that even more taxpayer resources will be needed going forward simply to maintain the current levels of care — levels that remain substandard at far too many VHA health care facilities (Managing risks and improving VA health care, 2020). Indeed, in spite of a growing multi-billion dollar budget, the quality of medical care provided at many VA health care facilities across the country has continued to decline to the point where many clinicians are expressing growing concern over the well-being of veteran patients (DeBeer & Matthieu, 2019).
High-Risk Areas Identified by the GAO
At present, all VA health care facilities are accredited by the Joint Commission, which makes high-quality patient care one of its core evaluation criteria (Joint Commission standards, 2020). Following the Joint Commission's most recent series of annual audits of VHA health care facilities, the GAO identified the following five high-risk areas that relate to the VA's ability to deliver timely access to high-quality medical care for veterans:
Conclusion
With the nation's understandable focus primarily on the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is easy to overlook or even ignore the multiple problems that veterans routinely encounter when seeking health care from the VA's Veterans Health Administration today. The research showed that despite a multi-billion dollar budget that has increased year over year, the VHA continues to suffer from a number of systemic problems that adversely affect its ability to deliver the high-quality health care services that the nation's veterans need and deserve. Millions of veterans will continue to suffer — many in silence — unless and until substantive steps are taken to address these longstanding problems.
References
About VHA. (2020). U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.va.gov/health/.
DeBeer, B. B., & Matthieu, M. M. (2019, January). Quality improvement evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of adding a concerned significant other to safety planning for suicide prevention with veterans. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41(1), 4–7.
Joint Commission standards. (2020). Joint Commission. Retrieved from www.jointcommission.org/standards/.
Managing risks and improving VA health care. (2020). U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.