Victim Precipitation and Crime: Four Criminological Theories

Introduction: Victims and Victimization

It is common knowledge that crimes involve two active parties: a criminal and a victim. However, according to criminological theorists, what is less commonly understood is the idea that victims sometimes partially create their own victimization depending on the circumstances. Criminologists have analyzed these circumstances and believe that victims often engage in behaviors that increase the likelihood of their being targeted for crime. This means that victims who are attacked are more likely to engage in risky behavior than non-victims. This belief is supported by four particular theories: Victim Precipitation, Lifestyle, Deviant Place, and Routine Activities.

Victim Precipitation Theory

The first of these theories is Victim Precipitation, which is based on the idea that victims may actively or passively initiate the conflict that leads to their injury or death. A person may actively precipitate their victimization by adhering to aggressive or provocative behavior, which can escalate to conflict and result in an attack.

For example, if a young woman is raped on an evening that she is out late with friends, police may question her about how she was dressed or how she addressed the rapist if they had prior contact. She may be considered to have actively participated in her victimization if she was out late by choice, dressed provocatively, and acting in a flirtatious manner with her attacker. Similarly, if a young man at a bar engages with an intoxicated older gentleman who initiates a verbal altercation, and the young man responds by pulling a knife, the older gentleman has aided in his own attack by verbally provoking the confrontation through offensive language.

A victim may also passively precipitate their victimization by possessing personal or social characteristics that make them attractive targets unknowingly. For example, an African-American boy who is beaten and terrorized by a gang of Caucasian boys because of his race has passively participated in his victimization through an immutable characteristic—his skin color cannot be changed, yet because of it, he was victimized.

To prevent actively provoking an attack, one can remain non-confrontational and avoid intensifying situations with tension. As a young woman, becoming more aware of surroundings, including the time spent out and locations visited, is important. Additionally, awareness of self-presentation—through clothing choices and demeanor—can reduce risk, such as avoiding excessive skin exposure and maintaining polite, conservative behavior during late hours.

Lifestyle Theory

The second theory is Lifestyle Theory, which is based on the idea that the way victims choose to live increases their exposure to criminals. This can be seen in individuals who live high-risk lifestyles, such as staying out late at night, drinking, or taking drugs, as well as those surrounded by delinquency and violence, such as carrying guns or selling drugs.

A gambler who stays in casinos nightly and uses cocaine and alcohol consistently will likely experience some form of victimization at some point simply because of the environment they inhabit. Similarly, a college student who attends wild parties every night while drinking and taking drugs is highly susceptible to victimization; if female, rape is a possibility because of the environment. Even criminals are subject to victimization because they exist in environments of crime. People involved with or around dangerous and violent individuals will eventually be exposed to such behavior themselves.

One could avoid this form of victimization by carefully choosing the people one associates with, as "you are the company that you keep." Staying home at night and living in a predominantly rural area reduces exposure. Married individuals experience fewer attacks than single individuals, suggesting that establishing family and domestic stability reduces need for social experiences outside the home. Additionally, since darkness is a criminogenic condition with fewer people present, higher rates of drug and alcohol use, and greater anonymity, ensuring one is home by a certain hour can reduce risk, as nighttime and weekends are peak times for violent crimes, property offenses, and public order violations.

Deviant Place Theory

The third theory is Deviant Place Theory, which asserts that the primary factor in victimization is the place of residence. A person living in a certain type of area is statistically prone to attack. People living in socially disorganized, densely populated, and highly transient neighborhoods become magnets for criminals because such areas contain high concentrations of addicts, low-income households, mentally ill individuals, and homeless people.

In these neighborhoods, residents are susceptible to "honor codes," meaning they must react against attacks and attackers; otherwise, they risk increased victimization or loss of reputation. It is best to live in a non-violent environment where non-violence is promoted and honor codes are absent. To reduce risk, one can research neighborhoods before moving and ensure there is minimal hostility and no demographic indicators of violence in the area.

Conclusion: Understanding Victim-Offender Relationships

It is communal knowledge that crimes involve two active parties: a criminal and a victim. However, what isn't communal, according to theorists, is the idea that the crime committed sometimes partially creates the victimization themselves, depending on the circumstances. The four theories discussed previously are only theories; however, they have been proven on multiple accounts. These theories also suggest that there is a relationship between victims and their criminals, whether realized or not. Our behavior does influence our fate, regardless of whether it is positive or negative, resulting in mere injury or fatality.

Siegel, L. (2011). Victims and victimization. In Criminology: The core (5th ed.). Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.