This paper examines how Wal-Mart's aggressive pricing, distribution, and marketing strategies have reshaped the toy industry in the United States. Drawing on industry analysis and news reporting, it explores how Wal-Mart's loss-leader pricing during the holiday season has weakened Toys-R-Us financially, pressured manufacturers such as Hasbro, Mattel, and LeapFrog to accept lower prices, and accelerated premature consolidation across the retail toy landscape. The paper also analyzes Wal-Mart's data-driven corporate culture and its use of pricing elasticity analysis to optimize sales volume. Finally, it argues that toy manufacturers must actively diversify their distribution channels to avoid dangerous over-dependence on a single dominant retailer.
The toy industry is experiencing premature market consolidation due to the pricing, distribution, and marketing strategies of Wal-Mart. The low-cost retailer's approach to competing aggressively on price — particularly over the holiday season — continues to have a significant financial impact on Toys-R-Us profitability. Following Thanksgiving, Wal-Mart has historically launched an aggressive loss-leader campaign to capture the majority of holiday toy sales each year. This strategy has been very successful for Wal-Mart and is considered by many industry and financial analysts to be a primary reason for Toys-R-Us's declining sales and profits.
Competing aggressively on price and availability of a select set of toys every holiday season, Wal-Mart directly impacts the manufacturers it purchases from as well. Hasbro, LeapFrog, Mattel, and many other manufacturers — having fewer distribution partners to rely on for sales — are forced to accept lower prices for their new products in exchange for broad distribution through Wal-Mart's network. While none of these manufacturers originally intended to sell the majority of their products at the lower prices Wal-Mart demands, many have no choice but to negotiate and hope to earn enough gross margin to cover their costs. Wal-Mart has become the most powerful toy distributor in the United States, which remains the toy industry's largest market.
Brown (2004), in her New York Times article "Imagining Toyland Without One of Its Giants," makes three fundamental points regarding the impact of Wal-Mart on toy manufacturers and Toys-R-Us specifically. First, Wal-Mart's loss-leader pricing is forcing Toys-R-Us to drastically reduce prices, worsening the company's financial condition and leading to potential store closures. The impact of Toys-R-Us closing stores has an immediate effect on manufacturers' marketing strategies and their ability to showcase entire product lines, test-market new products, and secure shelf space for innovative and unconventional concept toys. Second, Brown argues that in a consolidating distribution channel, manufacturer branding becomes more critical. Third, toy manufacturers who have grown increasingly dependent on Wal-Mart within a consolidating distribution channel must look to alternative channels for distributing and selling their products. Brown mentions electronics stores, bookstores, and online merchants as potential alternatives. Industry analysts also note that many manufacturers are turning to Web-based selling strategies on their own websites, exploring the direct-to-consumer online channel.
"Manufacturers urged to diversify beyond Wal-Mart dependency"
"Analytics and satellite data power Wal-Mart's pricing strategy"
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.