This paper investigates the dual nature of Wal-Mart's rise as the world's largest retailer, weighing its celebrated cost-cutting strategies against serious allegations of labor abuse, wage suppression, and the destruction of small businesses. Drawing on reports from KLD Research and Analytics, Harvard Business School commentary, and investigative journalism, the paper surveys Wal-Mart's vendor-contracting violations, illegal overtime practices, use of undocumented subcontract labor, and the inadequate health insurance coverage offered to employees. It also acknowledges the genuine consumer savings and career opportunities the company provides, before concluding that systemic reform of worker benefits and fairer treatment of global suppliers is necessary for Wal-Mart to become a constructive force in the broader economy.
Wal-Mart Corporation, the world's largest retailer, was founded by Sam Walton of Bentonville, Arkansas, and has grown over the past fifty years to post in excess of $245 billion in sales in 2003. Wal-Mart's relentless "price-rollback" strategies have prospered the company enormously, but critics argue they have simultaneously drained the lifeblood of the U.S. economy.
Wal-Mart takes advantage of laborers across the world β of all ages and ethnic groups β and has contributed to the closing of retailers and wholesalers alike. This raises a pressing question: is the success of Wal-Mart worth the devastation left in the wake of its prosperity?
What are expressed as marketing strategies feel to many observers more like aggressive tactics β specifically, Wal-Mart's relentless pressure on suppliers to cut wholesale costs. In its search for cheaper goods, Wal-Mart creates competition among countries, causing factory jobs to shift from one impoverished nation to another. Furthermore, none of Wal-Mart's workers are unionized, and it is doubtful that many families can be adequately supported on what amounts to minimal wages.
KLD Research and Analytics, Inc. reported that Wal-Mart was removed from its socially responsible investment list in 2001, stating that:
"Wal-Mart's vendor contracting policies and procedures have failed to meet the standards set by prominent human and labor rights activists, or those attained by other prominent companies that are similarly exposed to sweatshop controversies." [1]
In further reports, Wal-Mart managers β pressured by the main office in Bentonville to control labor costs β were found guilty by an Oregon jury of coercing hundreds of employees to work overtime hours without pay. [2] After being criticized in a broadcast transmitted via the company's in-house satellite network, those managers were also found guilty of tampering with time cards and bullying employees into working without clocking in. The reports noted that although Wal-Mart had settled cases in Oregon and Mexico, more than 40 additional cases remained pending against the company.
Wal-Mart has also faced legal problems over its hiring of illegal immigrant subcontract janitors and subsequently cheating them out of overtime pay. Federal agents raided 61 of the company's stores in a nationwide operation, and documents were seized at the Bentonville headquarters.
"Small business closures and wage losses examined"
"Consumer savings, careers, and supply-chain efficiency"
The only hope that the economic community can recover from the "Wal-Mart effect" lies in the negotiation of better benefits for Wal-Mart workers and finding effective means of ensuring fair and humane treatment of its global employees. Several initiatives exist toward this purpose, and the hope is that an effective mechanism for bringing Wal-Mart into alignment with basic labor standards can be found. Ideally, Wal-Mart should actively seek ways to integrate positively into the economic community β balancing the impact of its operations on both local economies and workers' rights worldwide.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.