Skip to main content
Essay High School 815 words

Washington Crossing the Delaware vs. His Resignation: Art Analysis

~5 min read 6 sections Arts · Art History
Abstract

This paper offers a comparative visual analysis of two historically significant paintings featuring George Washington: Emanuel Leutze's "Washington Crossing the Delaware" (1851) and John Trumbull's depiction of Washington resigning his commission to Congress. The paper examines how each artist uses environment, color, figures, and symbolism to convey meaning. Leutze's outdoor, action-filled scene contrasts sharply with Trumbull's ordered, ceremonial interior setting. Together, the paintings capture two pivotal moments in early American history — one representing military heroism, the other a democratic transfer of power — and illustrate how visual art can serve as a window into the nation's founding era.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Introduces both paintings and analytical framework
  • Environment: Outdoors versus Indoors: Contrasts outdoor action with indoor ceremony
  • Color and the Duties of Leadership: Examines similar somber tones across both works
  • The Significance of Figures and Composition: Compares orderly versus chaotic figure arrangements
  • Symbolism and Historical Turning Points: Links each painting to a pivotal American moment
  • Conclusion: Synthesizes historical and artistic significance of both paintings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper establishes a clear comparative framework upfront, identifying the four visual elements — environment, color, figures, and symbolism — that will structure the analysis throughout.
  • Historical context is woven into the art analysis, grounding observations about each painting in their real-world significance (the Battle of Trenton and the democratic transfer of military power).
  • The contrast between action and ceremony is used consistently and effectively to distinguish the two works, giving the comparison a coherent argumentative thread.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates the technique of parallel comparative analysis — applying the same set of evaluative criteria (environment, color, figures, symbolism) to each artwork in turn. This method ensures balanced treatment of both subjects and allows similarities and differences to emerge naturally from the structure rather than from assertion alone.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with an introductory paragraph that introduces both paintings and previews the analytical categories. It then moves through environment, color, figures, and symbolism in focused body paragraphs, each addressing both paintings in relation to the category at hand. A brief conclusion synthesizes the historical and artistic significance of both works. The paper is short but well-organized, suitable as an introductory art history or American history comparative essay at the high school level.

Essay 815 words

Introduction

Many paintings have been made of many different leaders over the years. Particularly, paintings of the early presidents — such as George Washington — depict significant events not only in the professional lives of these statesmen, but also in the lives of those under their leadership. Two paintings capture especially poignant moments in Washington's story: Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emanuel Leutze and General George Washington Resigning His Commission to Congress as Commander of the Army at Annapolis by John Trumbull. The first shows a glorious victory for Washington, while the other depicts the end of his military command and the beginning of a new era for the United States. Both works contain particular visual elements that provide meaning not only within each painting individually, but also when the two are compared and contrasted. This can be seen in terms of environment, color, figures, and symbolism.

Environment: Outdoors versus Indoors

The most obvious contrast between the two paintings is their environment. In Leutze's painting, the environment is entirely outdoors. A rather small boat carries the men across stormy waters. In Trumbull's painting, the action takes place in a large interior room. These settings connect directly with the subject matter each work depicts. The outdoor environment in Leutze's work suggests a sense of heroism and urgent action, whereas the indoor environment in Trumbull's painting suggests order and ceremony.

Color and the Duties of Leadership

The colors in both paintings are somewhat similar. Each work employs somber tones, depicting men in uniform performing a duty in service of their country. Although these duties differ vastly between the two paintings, the shared palette is fitting: in both cases, leaders are carrying out the grave responsibilities of leadership. Both paintings also depict important turning points in the growth of the United States.

In Leutze's work, Washington leads Continental soldiers to launch a surprise attack on Britain's Hessian forces at Trenton, New Jersey. The success of that attack represented a significant step forward for the former colonies as they sought their freedom (NEH, 2015). In Trumbull's work, the painting captures Washington's resignation from command at the Maryland State House in Annapolis. This act also marked a step forward for the United States, as it established a fundamental principle of democracy: civilian authority over the military (Architect of the Capitol, 2014).

2 Sections Hidden · 210 words
The Significance of Figures and Composition130 words
The figures in the paintings are also significant. In Trumbull's painting, statesmen, officials, and family members are arranged in…
Symbolism and Historical Turning Points80 words
Beyond composition and color, both paintings carry symbolic weight that reinforces their historical significance. Leutze's depiction of Washington's crossing of the Delaware River on the…

Conclusion

Both paintings depict important events in the life of George Washington and, historically, in the life of the nation. As such, each artist's use of environment, color, and figures provides the audience with a vivid glance into history. Together, these works serve as windows into a transformative era when the United States and its democratic ideals were still only beginning to take shape.

References

Architect of the Capitol. (2014). General George Washington resigning his commission. http://www.aoc.gov/capitol-hill/historic-rotunda-paintings/general-george-washington-resigning-his-commission

Leutze, E. (1851). Washington crossing the Delaware [Painting]. Metropolitan Museum of Art.

NEH. (2015). Emanuel Leutze's symbolic scene of Washington crossing the Delaware. http://edsitement.neh.gov/emanuel-leutzes-symbolic-scene-washington-crossing-delaware

Trumbull, J. General George Washington resigning his commission to Congress as Commander of the Army at Annapolis [Painting]. Architect of the Capitol.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Washington Crossing the Delaware General's Resignation Visual Analysis Emanuel Leutze John Trumbull American Democracy Military Heroism Colonial Symbolism Comparative Art Historical Painting
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Washington Crossing the Delaware vs. His Resignation: Art Analysis. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/washington-crossing-delaware-resignation-painting-comparison-2156823

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.