This paper examines the organizational challenges facing a Wisconsin manufacturing plant whose profitability is declining due to high labor costs. It considers whether the plant can be saved through structural changes alone or whether changing the people and organizational culture is essential. The paper analyzes key issues including union resistance to wage concessions, the legal and reputational risks of replacing workers with lower-wage alternatives, and the role of strategic communication in driving change. Drawing on Kurt Lewin's three-step change model, the paper argues that sustainable improvement requires both cultural transformation and meaningful employee involvement in the change process.
The objective of every business is to make a profit. This objective is achievable through proper planning and resource management within an organization (Daft 63). The changing nature of the business environment causes the profitability of businesses to decline over time, which is why organizations must adapt to the shifting dynamics of the business world. The profits of the Wisconsin plant have been diminishing gradually, and this has become an issue of concern to management, which is now seeking to introduce changes in the organization.
In a business with a profit orientation, tough decisions are necessary. The Wisconsin plant must undertake some changes in order to endure the competitive business environment (Daft 76). The required change is internal: the people and the culture of this organization must change. Management and employees need a forum in which they can discuss the future prospects of the organization together.
The high cost of labor is increasing the operational cost of the plant and contributing to a low profit margin (Daft 68). The production unit manager has the responsibility to devise a solution to this predicament. Management is prepared to close the plant if it cannot operate profitably. The plant employs five hundred and twenty people who depend entirely on the salaries and wages they receive from the company. The production manager has a concern for the welfare of these employees, since it will be difficult for them to find employment given the present unemployment rates in the locality.
The production manager discussed with the union the possibility of accepting lower wages for employees, but the union declined. He also suggested cross-training employees so they could work at different levels, and that idea was also rejected. As production manager, he does not want the firm to close a plant that has the potential to operate profitably. Another alternative solution to the problem is hiring Mexican workers at lower wages, which would save the company $15 million per year on labor (Lewis 17).
Laying off the existing labor force in order to hire lower-wage workers would have significant legal implications for the firm. The company would face scrutiny under labor law requirements that demand fair treatment of workers (Cameron et al. 35). Litigation would tarnish the organization's reputation, which in turn would negatively affect its sales and public standing. Therefore, the best option for both management and employees is to accept changes within the organization rather than pursue workforce replacement.
The union should be ready to make concessions with management if current employees are to keep their jobs. This is because management will make decisions based on the profit the plant can generate. If it is not possible to increase the profit margin, management will withdraw their investment from the plant, and employees will suffer the negative consequences of losing their livelihoods.
The primary type of change needed is not simply changing "things" — it is changing the people and the culture. Organizational culture shapes how employees think, work, and respond to external pressures. Without a cultural shift that aligns employee behavior with the organization's need for competitiveness, structural or technical fixes alone will be insufficient to sustain profitability.
"Lewin's model guides unfreezing, changing, and refreezing norms"
The changing of organizational culture and people is a process that requires proper communication (Daft 263). Employees must understand the urgency of the changes and how critical they are to the maintenance of their jobs. The change implementation process should involve employees so they feel like participants in the process and develop a positive attitude toward organizational change. When employees are included and informed, resistance is reduced and the likelihood of a successful cultural transformation is significantly improved.
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.