This paper examines how the 1939 film The Wizard of Oz conveys its central dream theme through three key filmmaking choices: cinematography, lighting, and acting style. The analysis explores how camera framing reinforces each character's desires, how the contrast between black-and-white and Technicolor photography delineates reality from the dream world, and how method acting techniques — including naturalistic and exaggerated performance styles — bridge fantasy and reality. Drawing on scholarship by Bulkeley, Plantinga, and Baumann, the paper argues that these deliberate technical and artistic decisions work together to create a coherent dream narrative that remains compelling to audiences today.
The Wizard of Oz is regarded by many as "like a dream" — an Alice in Wonderland-style motif set in America. It represents a window into mid-western culture while simultaneously constructing a dream world that allows a character like Dorothy to find both herself and her way home. Dreams influence films, and films influence how we understand dreams. The filmmakers behind The Wizard of Oz conveyed the dream element through deliberate decisions in cinematography, lighting, and acting style — decisions that together produced a film still regarded as one of the finest in its genre.
The cinematography of The Wizard of Oz follows several recurring themes, the most prominent of which is "Dreams, Hopes, and Plans." The dreams of Dorothy and her companions are brought into focus through an acting out of what each character desires most (Bulkeley, 1999).
The Tin Man wants a heart. Dorothy wants to get home. The Lion wants courage. The Scarecrow wants a brain. These goals represent what each character treasures above all else, and it is the desire for them that propels the group forward on their quest. The cinematography reinforces this theme through the careful introduction of each character who helps Dorothy find her way home. The Lion is consistently shown as afraid, the Tin Man as emotionless, and the Scarecrow as lacking memory and critical thinking. Although Dorothy is not introduced this way, once the tornado carries her to the land of Oz, her overriding dream becomes returning home.
Cinematography concerns the movement of the camera and the visual choices made to tell a story. During the Lion's introduction, he attempts to appear aggressive and threatening, even going after Dorothy's dog, Toto. When he declares, "I'll get you anyway, peewee," the camera focuses solely on him. It then cuts to the dog, and after Dorothy slaps the Lion on his nose, the camera returns to him alone as he reveals his true cowardice. A similar technique is used when the Scarecrow offers Dorothy contradictory directions. By restricting the frame to the individual character during moments that expose their desires or motivations, the cinematography continually reinforces the central theme.
"Dreams, Hopes, and Plans" is a pervasive theme that lighting also helps illuminate. The film employed a combination of Technicolor and all three principal lighting styles. Technicolor paired with high-key lighting was used in the Munchkinland scenes to signal happiness for both Dorothy and the audience. When the characters finally meet the Wizard, low-key lighting was chosen to convey fear and tension. By reserving low-key lighting for dramatic, intense sequences and high-key lighting to ease the audience into new environments, the film provides reassurance that the plot is progressing while simultaneously lending a dream-like quality to the journey.
This contrast was established at the very beginning of the film, when Dorothy is at home and the entire picture is in black and white. The use of three-point lighting in these early scenes signals Dorothy's unhappiness and sets the stage for the "dream" portion of the story — the land of Oz (Plantinga, 2009). By separating the real world in black and white from the dream world in Technicolor, the film creates a clear visual delineation that introduces the dream theme from the outset. Using lighting as an emotional layer that subtly blends concepts together is one of the film's most effective techniques for reinforcing its central plot points and themes.
"Naturalistic and exaggerated performances blend fantasy and reality"
While the method was arguably extreme, the result was a performance that felt genuine within a fantastical setting. Natural, authentic emotion was necessary to bridge the gap between reality and fantasy, with the fantasy representing the dream element. The actors playing the Lion, the Scarecrow, and the Tin Man at times used exaggerated expressions when interacting with Dorothy to emphasize the dream-like quality of Oz.
This exaggeration was especially pronounced during their introductions. It reinforces the dream theme because exaggeration is a common feature of dreams, and as Dorothy draws closer to home and to reality, her new friends gradually shed that exaggeration and begin to behave more naturally (Baumann, 2008, p. 322). By acting closer to normal as the story nears its end, the characters establish a final connection to the real world. Furthermore, when these characters receive a clock, a medal, and a diploma — concrete, real-world tokens — their once-abstract hopes are reframed in realistic terms, culminating in Dorothy's return home. When Dorothy awakens and recounts her journey in Oz, she is simply told it was "just a bad dream."
Dreams were an essential part of The Wizard of Oz. Through cinematography, lighting, and acting style, the film conveyed the hopes and plans of its main characters. These hopes began as dreams and came to fruition by the story's end, ultimately bridging the world of dreams with the world of reality.
Baumann, S. L. (2008). Wisdom, compassion, and courage in the Wizard of Oz: A humanbecoming hermeneutic study. Nursing Science Quarterly, 21(4), 322–329.
Bulkeley, K. (1999). Touring the dream factory: The dream-film connection in The Wizard of Oz and A Nightmare on Elm Street. Dreaming, 9(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021321227642
Plantinga, C. R. (2009). Moving viewers: American film and the spectator's experience. University of California Press.
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.