Women in Leadership Roles in the U.S. Military: A History
This paper traces the evolving role of women in the United States military from the Revolutionary War to the early 21st century. Beginning with women who disguised themselves as men to serve in combat, the paper examines how major conflicts gradually opened auxiliary and then leadership positions to women. It explores the motivations that drew women to military service, including patriotism, economic need, and career opportunity, while also documenting the institutional, legal, and social obstacles they faced. The paper applies relevant leadership theories to contextualize women's advancement through military ranks and concludes with an assessment of the progress made and the barriers that remain.
- Women in the Revolutionary and Civil Wars: Early women soldiers disguise themselves to serve
- Reasons Women Entered the Military: Patriotism, economics, and career opportunity motivate enlistment
- Obstacles to Women's Military Advancement: Legal, cultural, and institutional barriers limit women's rank
- Leadership Concepts and Theories Relevant to the Military: Authoritarian and situational theories frame women's advancement
- Women in the 20th-Century Military: Promotion reforms and persistent combat-role restrictions
- Conclusion: Progress made but challenges remain for women leaders
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper covers a broad chronological sweep — from the Revolutionary War to post-9/11 conflicts — and organizes that history into logically sequenced thematic sections rather than a simple timeline, making the argument easy to follow.
- It balances historical narrative with structural analysis, pairing concrete examples (e.g., Deborah Sampson Gannett, Jacqueline Cochran) with broader discussion of policy, leadership theory, and institutional culture.
- The inclusion of a section on leadership theories grounds the historical account in academic frameworks, demonstrating disciplinary awareness beyond pure narration.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a cause-and-effect structure throughout: for each era it identifies the conditions that enabled or constrained women's participation, then traces the outcomes. This technique gives the historical survey analytical depth, turning a list of events into an argument about institutional change over time.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with early military history and women's disguised service, then moves to the World Wars and the creation of women's auxiliary corps. Subsequent sections examine motivations for enlistment, institutional and cultural barriers, and the leadership theories that frame women's advancement. A penultimate section addresses 20th-century developments and ongoing combat-role restrictions, and the conclusion briefly gestures toward future opportunity.
Women in the Revolutionary and Civil Wars
Since the revolutionary period, women took center-stage positions in military leadership roles. This was unlike earlier periods, when they had to adopt disguises in order to serve alongside men (Taber, 2011). During those times, the acceptance of women into the military permitted them only into auxiliary positions. The prevailing belief was that the methods and weapons of war did not suit women; however, as circumstances changed, the military had to incorporate women into more challenging positions. There came a growing recognition that gender held no inherent importance on the battlefield, and women began receiving leadership positions within the United States military (Fredriksen, 1999).
During the Mexican, Civil, and Revolutionary Wars, remarkably few women participated in combat. Those who did had to disguise themselves as men to have any chance of enlistment, and they served only under aliases (Zenor-Lafond, 2008). One of the first American women on the battlefield was Deborah Sampson Gannett, who came from Plymouth, Massachusetts. She seized the opportunity to serve by enlisting under her brother's name in 1782, served in the Continental Army for two years, and was wounded twice. The Revolutionary War also saw Margaret Corbin fighting alongside her husband in the defense of Fort Washington in New York (Bloom, 2011). At Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Elizabeth C. Newcome joined the military to fight against Native Americans in 1847 in Dodge City. Her gender was discovered ten months after enlisting, and she was discharged from service.
Many women similarly disguised themselves as men to serve in the Civil War, and some managed to complete their service without ever having their gender discovered. This trend began to change during World War I, when rising interest among women in military service led to over 12,000 women enlisting in the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. By World War II, the total number of women serving in the military rose to 350,000, with many serving as Army or Navy nurses. The military created the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) in 1942, which served in North Africa. One year later it was redesignated the Women's Army Corps (WAC), with members serving in France, England, New Guinea, Australia, and the Philippines. World War II also saw the Marines, Navy, and Coast Guard establish women's reserve units (Sarnecky, Borden Institute (U.S.) & Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 2010).
The Navy established the Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service (WAVES) in 1942, and women began receiving acceptance into various administrative, communications, and medical positions. In the same year, the Coast Guard created the SPARS, and the Marine Corps Women's Reserve was established one year later. Most military women served stateside, but by the end of World War II, female personnel comprised 85% of those serving at the headquarters of the Marine Corps (Mulrine, 2012).
References
Alfonso, K. L. (2010). Femme Fatale 2010. Air & Space Power Journal, 24(3), 59.
Bloom, M. (2011). Bombshells: Women and terror. Gender Issues, 28(1/2), 1. doi:10.1007/s12147-011-9098-z
Fredriksen, J. C. (1999). American military leaders: From colonial times to the present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Haritos-Fatouros, M., Zimbardo, P., Stoltzfus, N., Fotopoulou, M., & Dikaiou, M. (2010). PTSD and female military returnees from Iraq and Afghanistan: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of US-China Public Administration, 7(8), 80–85.
Klenke, K. (2011). Women in leadership: Contextual dynamics and boundaries. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.
LaGuardia-Kotite, M. J. (2012). Changing the rules of engagement: Inspiring stories of courage and leadership from women in the military. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books.
McNulty, S. S. (2012). Myth busted: Women are serving in ground combat positions. Air Force Law Review, 68, 119.
Mulrine, A. (2012, July). Women in combat: U.S. military on verge of making it official. Christian Science Monitor, p. N.PAG.
Sarnecky, M. T., Borden Institute (U.S.), & Walter Reed Army Medical Center. (2010). A contemporary history of the U.S. Army Nurse Corps. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Borden Institute, Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
Skaine, R. (2011). Women in combat: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Taber, N. (2011). 'You better not get pregnant while you're here': Tensions between masculinities and femininities in military communities of practice. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(3), 331–348. doi:10.1080/02601370.2011.570871
Zenor-Lafond, H. (2008). Women and combat: Why they serve. Inquiry, 32–38.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.