This paper examines workplace conflict through a cross-cultural lens, identifying two primary types: conflict between management and subordinates, and conflict among employees themselves. Drawing on Leung's (2008) study of Hong Kong employees and Adler's (2009) interpersonal communication framework, the paper contrasts American and Chinese workplace cultures along the dimensions of individualism-collectivism and uncertainty avoidance. It argues that because Chinese culture favors indirect communication and respect for authority, conflict resolution strategies must be tailored accordingly — favoring subtle, socially mediated approaches over the direct confrontation more common in American workplaces.
Two of the most common types of workplace conflict are: (1) friction or misunderstanding between management and its employees or subordinates, and (2) disagreements among employees themselves, particularly differences in attitudes, values, and beliefs about both professional and personal issues.
The first type is most common primarily because there is an inherent difference in perspective between bosses and subordinates. Since they view their roles and responsibilities through different lenses, conflict is often unavoidable. For example, management tends to approach a work task or activity at a macro level, while an employee — who directly handles the task at hand — is focused on the specific process that must be completed. Because of these conflicting perspectives, it becomes inevitable that both parties assert what they believe is correct. In reality, both may be right; they are simply looking at the same task from different vantage points.
The second type is another frequent occurrence in the workplace. It is not unusual for employees to disagree among themselves. Each person's competence, values, beliefs, and personality traits can influence how they interact with their team. In the course of accomplishing daily work tasks, employees manage stress and interact with one another every day. These factors can strengthen cohesiveness among colleagues, but they can also be sources of disagreement and misunderstanding from time to time.
The Chinese workplace setting is characterized by very high uncertainty avoidance and a collectivist nature, and these characteristics are reflective of most Asian cultures both generally and in professional environments. By contrast, American workplace culture is primarily individualist and has very low uncertainty avoidance — meaning Americans are generally not averse to confrontation or open disagreement. Given these fundamental differences, it is unlikely that the Chinese workplace environment would be a natural fit with American workplace norms and expectations.
"Indirect, socially mediated resolution suits Chinese culture"
"Culture-sensitive approaches required for effective resolution"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.