Workplace Conflict Management: Causes, Impacts & Strategies
This paper examines workplace conflict management in the context of today's diverse, globalized business environment. It identifies the primary causes of workplace conflict — including workforce diversity, miscommunication, and interpersonal differences — and analyzes both the negative and positive impacts conflict can have on organizational productivity. The paper then outlines three major categories of conflict management strategies: psychological approaches that address employee needs and behaviors, managerial approaches that establish clear policies and resolution steps, and conflict management training programs that build staff competencies. Together, these strategies provide organizational leaders with a practical framework for reducing unnecessary conflict and handling disputes effectively.
- Introduction: Diversity and globalization drive workplace conflict management needs
- Causes and Impacts of Workplace Conflict: Miscommunication, diversity, and interpersonal issues cause conflict
- Psychological Approaches to Conflict Management: Addressing employee needs and communication reduces conflict
- Managerial Approaches to Conflict Management: HR policies and clear resolution steps manage disputes
- Conflict Management Training: Training builds staff competencies for resolving conflicts
- Conclusion: Leaders must address conflict to sustain organizational success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from problem identification (causes and impacts) to solution (strategies), giving the argument a clear and satisfying structure.
- It balances both negative and positive dimensions of workplace conflict, demonstrating critical thinking rather than a one-sided view.
- Multiple peer-reviewed and practitioner sources are cited throughout, lending credibility to each claim without over-relying on any single reference.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of literature: rather than summarizing one source at a time, the author weaves together multiple citations within each paragraph to build a coherent, multi-perspective argument. For example, the section on managerial approaches draws on Currie et al., Bruce, and Teague et al. in sequence to build a layered case for policy-driven conflict resolution.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that establishes context (globalization, diversity) and a clear thesis. The body is divided into two analytical sections — causes and impacts, followed by strategies — with the strategies section further broken into three distinct approaches (psychological, managerial, and training-based). A brief conclusion restates the key takeaways. This three-part strategy breakdown is the paper's strongest structural feature, giving readers a practical, actionable framework.
Introduction
The modern business environment comprises individuals from different nationalities and racial and ethnic backgrounds, driven by increased globalization and rapid technological advancements. As a result, human resource management practices in today's business climate have incorporated diversity as a crucial component for promoting the wellbeing and success of the workforce. Diversity is seen as an important factor in enhancing the contributions of employees toward the achievement of organizational goals and objectives. However, organizations are faced with the need to handle conflicts effectively because of the diverse nature of the workplace and workforce (Oni-Ojo, Iyiola & Osibanjo, 2014). Therefore, workplace conflict management has emerged as an important factor in promoting the effective functioning of the workforce. Effective workplace conflict management requires understanding the causes and impacts of conflict and utilizing appropriate strategies to reduce unnecessary conflicts and deal with them when they arise.
Causes and Impacts of Workplace Conflict
According to Overton & Lowry (2013), workplace conflict is a common occurrence in the modern business environment. The increase in workplace conflicts in today's organizations is largely attributable to the differentiated nature of the workforce, due to various factors — particularly globalization (Longe, 2015). Workplace conflicts are also attributable to miscommunication while carrying out work activities. Miscommunication that contributes to workplace conflicts occurs when inappropriate information is communicated, when appropriate information is transmitted poorly, or when the wrong medium is used to convey information (Huan & Yazdanifard, 2012). Riaz & Junaid (2013) state that workplace conflict is also brought about by interpersonal, intrapersonal, intergroup, and intragroup issues.
Even though workplace conflict is an inevitable phenomenon, it is associated with negative impacts on employee productivity. Organizational conflict has been found to affect workforce productivity at individual, group, and organizational levels (Chaudhry & Asif, 2015). This decreased productivity is attributable to impaired teamwork, increased employee turnover, low self-esteem, and reduced job satisfaction. On the contrary, workplace conflict has also been found to have some positive impacts on the organization. Conflict can act as an indicator for management regarding the inadequate functioning of certain employees or processes in the workplace (Chaudhry & Asif, 2015). Through this signal, management can identify ways to address those people and processes, ultimately enhancing productivity and organizational success.
Psychological Approaches to Conflict Management
One of the essential organizational leadership skills is the ability to identify conflict, understand its nature, and utilize suitable conflict resolution strategies (Myatt, 2012). The inevitability of organizational conflict means that organizational leaders must develop conflict management skills. Lawless & Trif (2016) contend that effective workplace conflict management requires a combination of psychological and managerial approaches. These approaches provide a suitable framework for understanding and handling interpersonal conflicts in the workplace. Psychological approaches for workplace conflict management incorporate measures that address communication and the individual characteristics of employees. These include strategies that help meet the unmet needs of employees, clarify roles in the workplace, address perceived inequalities, and promote suitable workplace behaviors (Society for Human Resource Management, 2015).
Conclusion
Workplace conflict is an inevitable phenomenon in the modern business environment because of the diverse nature of organizational employees. The likelihood of interpersonal conflicts in the organization is also influenced by increased globalization, the nature of work, and differences in personalities. Workplace conflict has significant impacts on the organization, particularly on the productivity of its employees. Therefore, organizational leaders face the need to understand the causes and effects of these conflicts and identify effective strategies for dealing with them in order to enhance organizational success and profitability.
References
Bruce, S. (2013, June 24). 6 steps to conflict resolution in the workplace. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2013/06/24/6-steps-to-conflict-resolution-in-the-workplace/
Chaudhry, A. M. & Asif, R. (2015). Organizational conflict and conflict management: A synthesis of literature. Journal of Business and Management Research, 9, 238–244.
Currie et al. (2016). The management of workplace conflict: Contrasting pathways in the HRM literature. International Journal of Management Reviews. Retrieved from https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/100637667/management_of_workplace.pdf
Frost, S. (2018). What are the benefits of good conflict resolution skills? Retrieved March 18, 2018, from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/benefits-good-conflict-resolution-skills-37268.html
Huan, L. J. & Yazdanifard, R. (2012). The difference of conflict management styles and conflict resolution in workplace. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 141–155.
Lawless, J. & Trif, A. (2016, August 23). Managing interpersonal conflicts at work by line managers. The Irish Journal of Management, 35(1).
Leon-Perez, J. M., Notelaers, G. & Leon-Rubio, J. M. (2015, February 16). Assessing the effectiveness of conflict management training in a health sector organization: Evidence from subjective and objective indicators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(1), 1–12.
Longe, O. (2015, May 14). Impact of workplace conflict management on organizational performance: A case of Nigerian manufacturing firm. Journal of Management and Strategy, 6(2), 83–92.
Mikkelsen, E. N. (2012, May). Exploring how conflict management training changes workplace conflicts: A qualitative case study. Journal of Conflictology, 3(1), 7–17.
Myatt, M. (2012, February 22). 5 keys of dealing with workplace conflict. Forbes. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikemyatt/2012/02/22/5-keys-to-dealing-with-workplace-conflict/
Oni-Ojo, B. E., Iyiola, O. O. & Osibanjo, A. O. (2014). Managing workplace conflicts in business environment: The role of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). European Journal of Business and Management, 6(36), 74–82.
Overton, A. R. & Lowry, A. C. (2013, December). Conflict management: Difficult conversations with difficult people. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 26(4), 259–264.
Riaz, M. K. & Junaid, F. A. (2013). Types, sources, costs & consequences of workplace conflict. Asian Journal of Management Research, 1–14.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2015, November 4). Managing workplace conflict. Retrieved March 18, 2018, from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/managingworkplaceconflict.aspx
Teague et al. (2017, November). ADR-based workplace conflict management systems: A case of American exceptionalism. Retrieved from Cornell University ILR School website:
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.