This paper analyzes the accounting fraud at WorldCom, the telecommunications giant that filed for bankruptcy in 2002 despite holding $104 billion in assets. Drawing on Kaplan and Kiron's Harvard Business School case study, the paper explores how WorldCom's fragmented organizational culture, lack of a coherent code of conduct, and top-down pressure from CFO Sullivan created conditions that enabled systematic manipulation of financial records. It also examines why employees did not engage in whistle-blowing, the role of corporate culture in suppressing dissent, and how large-scale corporate fraud damages the broader reputation of the accounting profession.
There are numerous examples that reveal accounting fraud in the corporate world. Such situations have a significant impact on companies, their employees, the broader business environment, accountants, and public opinion. These scandals, amplified by the media, have raised serious doubts about certain accounting firms and the professionals within them. WorldCom is no exception. The fraud in which the company was involved was widely considered to be the result of a defective organizational system, rather than solely the actions of certain individuals.
The telecommunications company WorldCom filed for bankruptcy in 2002, despite having $30 billion in revenues, $104 billion in assets, and 60,000 employees. Some specialists in the field consider that the accounting fraud at WorldCom was heavily influenced by the company's organizational culture. Indeed, that culture was far from well-structured, given that WorldCom had expanded its business by acquiring numerous smaller companies (Kaplan & Kiron, 2008). These acquisitions produced a mix of different people and organizational cultures, which led to defective communication within the company, across its departments, and among its offices. For example, the company's headquarters was in Texas, the finance department was located in Mississippi, and the human resources department operated out of Florida.
One of the central problems at WorldCom was that the company's managers neither liked nor trusted its lawyers, and they made little effort to hide that fact. As a consequence, each department was effectively encouraged to develop its own rules, meaning that managers across departments did not share common goals. The company failed to develop and implement meaningful policies, and establishing a code of conduct was an aspect that corporate managers showed no interest in pursuing.
There was a clear divide between regular employees and the company's senior managers. Top managers earned compensation that exceeded the approved salary and bonus guidelines, and such practices had essentially become habitual at the management level without challenge from other departments. Employees were not encouraged to voice disagreement with these practices. Given this environment, it is evident that the company's culture actively encouraged and sustained the conditions that made accounting fraud possible.
There were also notable differences between outside directors and CEO Bernie Ebbers and other internal managers. Regular communication between outside directors and Ebbers was largely absent, and outside directors had little meaningful influence over WorldCom's strategic direction. The financial information presented to the board of directors was manipulated by the company's CFO, Scott Sullivan.
The company's CEO played an important role in the release of accruals. For example, WorldCom was required to make line cost estimations each month. However, bills for these costs were often not received or paid for several months after the costs were incurred. Accounting principles required that the company make payment estimations matched against revenues in the income statements. As a result, the CFO directed subordinates to release accruals that he deemed too high.
"Sullivan pressured staff to book illegal accrual releases"
"Culture suppressed employee dissent and reporting"
"Scandal damaged public trust in accountants broadly"
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.