Skip to main content
Research Paper Undergraduate 2,186 words

Young Adults' Access to Mental Health Services: A Study

~11 min read
Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative research proposal examining the challenges young adults encounter when attempting to access mental health services through both conventional and digital means. Drawing on recent literature about youth mental health — including the heightened impact of the COVID-19 pandemic — the paper identifies key barriers such as stigma, long wait times, limited youth-specific interventions, and inadequate provider training. Using a positivist paradigm and a survey-based design targeting college students aged 18–25 in Florida, the study aims to assess satisfaction with existing services, frequency of stressors, and barriers to help-seeking. The paper also includes appendices featuring a recruitment flyer and a 19-item survey questionnaire with Likert-scale and open-ended items.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Youth mental health challenges and service gaps
  • Purpose of the Study: Rationale and aims of the research
  • Methodology: Research design, paradigm, and sampling approach
  • Survey Instrumentation and Data Collection: Questionnaire structure, Likert scale, and data analysis
  • References and Appendices: Citations, recruitment flyer, and full survey instrument
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper clearly situates the research gap — the relative neglect of youth-specific mental health services — within a broader social and pandemic context, giving the study genuine contemporary relevance.
  • The methodology section is logically organized, moving from paradigm to design to sampling procedure and instrumentation in a coherent, step-by-step fashion that demonstrates research planning fluency.
  • The appendices (recruitment flyer and survey questionnaire) operationalize abstract concepts effectively, showing how theoretical constructs like stigma and access barriers translate into measurable survey items.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates hypothesis-driven quantitative research design. Rather than leaving research questions open-ended, the author specifies directional hypotheses about resource gaps and the absence of youth-specific interventions, then aligns each methodological choice — positivist paradigm, survey instrument, Likert scale — to test those hypotheses systematically.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a literature-grounded introduction establishing the problem, followed by a focused purpose statement. The methodology section covers paradigm, design, population, procedure, instrumentation, and data analysis. Two appendices ground the proposal in practical tools: a recruitment flyer and a 19-item survey questionnaire organized into demographic, mental health screening, and service-access subsections. This structure reflects a standard undergraduate research proposal format.

Introduction

Mental health and wellbeing are crucial aspects of young adults' lives, as they can affect academic performance and the ability to become well-rounded, productive citizens. Many young people have poor mental health due to academic stress, witnessing or experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) in their homes, social disadvantage, abuse, abandonment, and bullying (Kirker et al., 2022). Even though youth mental health problems are often overlooked, failure to provide effective intervention can result in lasting harmful effects. Some young people develop behavioral problems, suicidal ideation, intrusive thoughts, substance abuse, and antisocial behaviors that prevent them from becoming socially competent individuals (Appleton et al., 2021). In extreme cases, youths may commit suicide, particularly when they experience severe stress or traumatic events such as rape, cyberbullying, neglect, or physical abuse.

Over the years, many studies have focused on mental health services provided for adults without adequately considering the needs of young adults (Meherali et al., 2021). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health problems among youths gained greater attention because isolation worsened existing symptoms. Lockdowns caused many young people to stay indoors without any form of in-person interaction with friends. Many relied heavily on social media, which contributed to body image issues, depression, anxiety, bullying, and suicidal ideation among some users (Hollis, 2022). Academic stress was also a significant concern as students were forced to adapt rapidly to technology-based learning environments. Although some students adjusted quickly, many continue to recover from the negative consequences the pandemic had on their mental wellbeing. Unfortunately, mental health resources were limited during this period, and many youths could not access services due to long wait times as clinic specialists struggled to keep pace with surging demand (Hollis, 2022). Others turned to virtual or online therapy, although the effectiveness of such services had not been thoroughly researched at the time.

In addition to inadequate resources and difficulty accessing mental health services, research shows that other factors prevent youths from seeking help. These include the stigmatization of mental health problems, poor interactions with mental health practitioners, misconceptions and feelings of being judged, and feelings of shame (Appleton et al., 2021). Consequently, many young people continue experiencing elevated trauma symptoms, depression, and anxiety. Given the limited research that has focused specifically on youth mental health, it is critical to examine the needs of this population to ensure that appropriate resources are made available. This means identifying the challenges young people encounter when seeking mental health services — through both conventional means and digital technologies — in order to design better support systems.

Purpose of the Study

Recent studies indicate that little attention has been paid to mental health services available to young people, despite the lasting impacts of mental health problems (Kirker et al., 2022). This study seeks to bridge that existing gap by investigating the challenges youths face when attempting to access mental health services both online and offline. It also aims to recommend viable solutions to ensure that young people receive effective support services to improve their wellbeing. The research could, for instance, reveal the most effective digital services to recommend to youths and offer insight into designing interventions tailored specifically to meet their needs.

Methodology

What obstacles do young people confront when attempting to obtain mental health services, both virtually and through conventional means?

The study is guided by three hypotheses:

First, existing mental health services lack interventions designed to meet the specific needs of youths. Second, there are limited resources available for young people and few professionals with the training necessary to meet their unique demands in a non-judgmental and competent manner. Third, only a small number of youth-specific evidence-based mental health interventions are available online.

The positivist paradigm, which views reality as objective rather than subjective, will be used in this study. The underlying premise is that an objective reality exists and that knowledge is derived from observation and experimentation rather than human perception alone (Park et al., 2020). Quantitative research tends to align closely with the positivist paradigm.

A quantitative research design will be used, with data collected via a survey questionnaire. This approach enables collection of honest responses from a large number of participants. Unlike interviews, questionnaires allow anonymity, reducing pressure to provide socially desirable answers. A large sample size also supports generalizability of findings.

The sample will comprise students from various college campuses in Florida. Participation will be balanced by gender, with 50% female and 50% male students. To ensure adequate representation, the study will also include participants from various racial backgrounds.

Participants will be recruited both online and offline. Flyers (Appendix A: Recruitment Flyer) will be distributed across different campuses, inviting students who experience mental health challenges to participate. Various online platforms, including social media, will be used to reach students across campuses. Simple random sampling will be used to select participants, after which consent will be sought via email. Participants will then receive a link to the online questionnaire via email (Appendix B: Survey Questionnaire).

To protect anonymity, participants will be advised not to provide their names or any identifying information on the questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction with interactions with mental health specialists, assess the effectiveness of virtual interventions they have received, and identify barriers that hinder effective utilization of mental health services among young people.

2 locked sections · 870 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Survey Instrumentation and Data Collection560 words
The questionnaire will mainly comprise close-ended questions developed so that respondents can use a 5-point Likert Scale, ranked from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). At the end of the survey, respondents will be asked an…
References and Appendices310 words
Appleton, R., Elahi, F., Tuomainen, H., Canaway, A., & Singh, S. P. (2021). "I'm just a long history of people rejecting referrals":…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools
Key Concepts in This Paper
Mental Health Access Youth Stigma Telehealth Services COVID-19 Impact Positivist Paradigm Survey Design Help-Seeking Barriers College Students Likert Scale Youth-Specific Interventions
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Young Adults' Access to Mental Health Services: A Study. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/young-adults-mental-health-services-access-2178854

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.