Essay Topic Hub

Attack
Essays

3,927+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

3,927 papers
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
What is Attack?

The concept of attack spans a wide range of academic disciplines, from criminal justice and political science to cybersecurity, psychology, and international relations. Students encounter this topic in courses on national security, terrorism studies, public health, and information technology, among others. What makes it academically compelling is its breadth: an attack can refer to a coordinated military strike, a terrorist act, a cyberincursion, or even a psychological episode, each raising distinct questions about threat, vulnerability, and institutional response. Events such as the attack on Pearl Harbor and the actions of groups like Al Qaeda serve as recurring case studies that illustrate how nations assess risk, process intelligence, and justify policy decisions.

Papers on this topic take several distinct approaches. Historical and analytical essays examine specific military events, such as the Japanese preparation and attack on Pearl Harbor or the USS Liberty incident, focusing on intelligence failures and the decisions that shaped national response. Other papers shift toward contemporary security threats, covering advanced persistent threats in cyberspace, aviation security, and the implications of legislation like the Habeas Corpus Patriot Act. A smaller set of papers explores psychological dimensions, including panic disorder and the fear of public speaking, while others address ideological violence through examinations of jihad, extremism, and global terrorism's impact on international business.

A strong essay on this topic requires a clearly scoped thesis that identifies a specific type of attack, a context, and an arguable claim about cause, consequence, or response. Evidence drawn from documented incidents, policy records, or established security frameworks carries the most weight. A common pitfall is treating "attack" too broadly, resulting in a paper that surveys many events without analyzing any single case with sufficient depth.

3,927 papers
Sort by:
Paper Undergraduate
Predator drones and the reduction of roadside bombings in Afghanistan
This paper outlines findings and analysis of research data on the use of Predator unmanned aircraft in managing the rampant roadside bombings in Afghanistan. The paper provides the results of the research and the analytical arguments that make result of the findings. The paper also contains the concluding analytical arguments based on what research has revealed to answer the research question.
Paper Undergraduate
Saint Anthony the Great and the origins of Christian monasticism
Why St. Anthony decided to become an ascetic
Research Paper Doctorate
Bush's justifications for the 2003 invasion of Iraq examined
Should we have gone to war with Iraq based on the reasons given at the time the war started? When we went to war with Iraq, Bush gave three reasons for doing so. First, he claimed that Saddam Hussein had ties to…
Research Paper Doctorate
William Buckley, William Rusher, and the rise of American conservatism
¶ … conservative intellectual movement, but also the role of William Buckley and William Rusher in the blossoming of the youth conservative movement
Research Paper Doctorate
Gullickson's analysis of women in the Paris Commune of 1871
¶ … Unruly Women of Paris, the historian and author Gay L. Gullickson clarifies a common misperception of history through unfolding a historical narrative and contrasting popular illustrations and images with historical…
Thesis Undergraduate
The 9/11 Commission's intelligence reform recommendations and their practical limitations
There's a substantial gap between the notions presented by the 9/11 Commission on inadequate imagination and its suggested solutions. It's unlikely that the primary modifications can help create analytical solutions in…
Paper Undergraduate
Structural violence framework's utility in analyzing international conflict
Structural Violence Framework in International Conflict
Paper Masters
Natural resources and conflict: examining war's economic causes
War is one of the primordial human traditions. Man has always been enthusiastic about fighting, murdering and stealing from others. However, it doesn't derive us to the conclusion that interpersonal associations are…
Paper Doctorate
Jane Elliott's blue eyes and brown eyes discrimination experiment
Sociological Cultural Opinions This assignment dealt with two different topics: Jane Elliot's seminal Blue Eyed/Brown Eyed lesson in racism, set forth in the video, A Class Divided; and Howard Zinn's anti-war thoughts in the videos, Empire or Humanity and Just War. Elliot was a courageous, pioneering educator who devised a lesson with an approach that was: timely, because it started immediately after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination and in the late 60's, which were culturally tumultuous in America's history; profoundly effective, because you can see the stunning impact it had on the students and, frankly, because it made some people angry at Elliot, which is frequently a good sign of effectiveness; and forward-thinking, because understanding other races and cultures is a pillar of diversity, which is now acknowledged to be nationally and globally vital. Furthermore, eye color was and is an excellent metaphor for race because it cannot be helped (unless one wears those awful-looking contacts) and it has no bearing on human capabilities. Zinn discussed the possibility of Peace and the truth of War. Despite the persistence of war in History, Zinn's videos, Empire or Humanity and Just War, give eye-opening and positive views of a possible world without war. The conditions preventing peace are certainly powerful and longstanding; however, conditions that support Peace are also plentiful. It is easy to see why Zinn has been called a "happy warrior," as he was an intelligent, insightful, persistent anti-war activist who made a great deal of sense about the true reasons for war and the genuine possibility of Peace.
Paper Undergraduate
The legality of U.S. drone strikes under international law
Abstract The legality of the drone strikes is a disputed matter. A major challenge to the international law and the international system is the US policy of using drones aerially to carry out target killings. According to some reports US drone strikes have killed almost 4,000 people since 2002 in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries. The Congress of United States of America reviews their policy of drone strikes, which had increased to a great deal under the Obama regime, every month. The main problem of using the drone strikes is that it has not been able to stop terrorism. Instead of stopping it, it has given rise to the terrorist activities. This study is a research based on the topic of drone attacks and the legality of targeted attacks. The study is based on information and research. The study includes graphs and charts which are based on reliable sources.