The Secret: The Power by Rhonda Byrne — A Critical Review
Rhonda Byrne's The Secret: The Power (2010) is truly an incredibly bad book, simplistic, repetitive and divorced from real history, politics or economics, yet it has sold 19 million copies. A cynic might say that the real secret to wealth is writing a bestselling book that millions will buy. Her 2006 book The Secret sold more over 19 million copies and was translated into 46 languages, and she was also a guest on the Oprah Winfrey Show and many others on the daytime TV chat circuit. Like all self-help writers, she has a talent for publishing the same advice repeatedly in new books that claim to offer even greater insights than past philosophers and religious teachers and in 2007 Byrne wrote The Secret Gratitude Book, followed a year later by The Secret: Daily Teachings. Her latest offering is about 250 pages long and quickly appeared on the bestseller lists, which indicates the type of strong cult following that all publishers desire. Byrne's central thesis is that human beings can change their entire lives and have everything they want simply by wishing for it, including money, wealth, happiness, careers, and romantic relationships.
How Facebook Reshapes Friendship, Identity, and Culture
This is a six page paper about new media. In particular, the paper addresses Henry Jenkins and Larry Gross who have respectively argued for thinking about new media in terms of democratization and visibility. However, Sherry Turkle in an interview with Robin Marantz Henig article describe the downside of social media. The paper focuses on Facebook in the discussion.
Robert Nardelli's Leadership Failures at Home Depot
Robert Nardelli became CEO of Home Depot, even though he did not have retail experience. Some questioned that decision, but he was successful in making many good changes for the company. However, over time his leadership ethics were called into question. He eventually left the company abruptly with a very large severance package, much to the surprise of many. This paper addresses whether his leadership was actually unethical in nature.