mla
REFERENCESAlfano, C. A., Lau, S., Balderas, J., Bunnell, B. E., & Beidel, D. C. (2016). The impact of military deployment on children: Placing developmental risk in context. Clinical Psychology Review, 43, 17-29.Allen, D. C. (2015). Research, when you know what you’re doing: A review of essentials of qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 20(4), 451-453.Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 5(2), 272-281.Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136.Bello?Utu, C. F., & DeSocio, J. E. (2015). Military deployment and reintegration: A systematic review of child coping. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 23-34.Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.Bennett, J. (2018). Combating sexual assault with the military ethic: Exploring culture, military institutions, and norms-based preventive policy. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 707-730.Bolles, E., & Patrizio, K. (2016). Leadership tenets of military veterans working as school administrators. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), 98-116.Bondy, E., Ross, D. D., Gallingane, C., & Hambacher, E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive classroom management and more. Urban Education, 42(4), 326-348.Brownfield, D., & Thompson, K. (1991). Attachment to peers and delinquent behavior. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 45.Burton, N. W., Pakenham, K. I., & Brown, W. J. (2010). Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 15(3), 266-277.Carey, M. A., & Asbury, J. E. (2016). Focus group research. Routledge.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 14, 33-46.Chang, R. (2017). Genevra Walters: How tech can close the achievement gap: Students who struggle need more technology, not less. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 44(1), 12.Cheng, C. C. & Huang, K. H. (2018). Education reform and teacher agency. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(3), 286-287.Chester, J., & Montgomery, K. (2008). No escape: Marketing to kids in the digital age. Multinational Monitor, 29(1), 11.Conforte, A. M., Bakalar, J. L., Shank, L. M., Quinlan, J., Stephens, M. B., Sbrocco, T., & Tanofsky-Kraff, M. (2017). Assessing military community support: Relations among perceived military community support, child psychosocial adjustment, and parent psychosocial adjustment. Military Medicine, 182(9-10), e1871-e1878.Cozza, S. J., Knobloch, L. K., Gewirtz, A. H., DeVoe, E. R., Gorman, L. A., Flake, E. M., ... & Lerner, R. M. (2018). Lessons learned and future recommendations for conducting research with military children and families. In A Battle Plan for Supporting Military Families (pp. 265-287). Springer, Cham.Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication.Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. CA: Sage.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Dahlman, H. (2013, September/October). The journey toward cross-cultural competence is never-ending. Momentum, 44(3), 27-31.De Pedro, K. T., Astor, R. A., Gilreath, T. D., Benbenishty, R., & Berkowitz, R. (2018). School climate, deployment, and mental health among students in military-connected schools. Youth & Society, 50(1), 93-115.DeVoe, E. R. (2017). Supporting military families with young children throughout the deployment lifecycle. Boston: Trustees of Boston University.DeVoe, E. R., Paris, R., Emmert-Aronson, B., Ross, A., & Acker, M. (2017). A randomized clinical trial of a post-deployment parenting intervention for service members and their families with very young children. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(S1), 25.Doge, P. & Keller, H. (2014, July-September). Similarity of mothers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' and preschool teachers\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' evaluations of socialization goals in a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 377-381.Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Hutchins, D. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. City: Corwin Press.Ellison, T. L. & Evans, J. N. (2016, Fall). Minecraft, teachers, parents, and learning: What they need to know and understand. SchoolCommunity Journal, 26(2), 25-30.Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school, and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36.Espinosa, E. M., Sorensen, J. R., & Lopez, M. A. (2013). Youth pathways to placement:The influence of gender, mental health need, and trauma on confinement in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(12), 1824-1836.Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.Francis Howell School District. (2018). Epstein’s 6 types of parent involvement. Retrieved from on 6 June 2019Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.Gangai, K. N. (2014). Absenteeism at workplace: What are the factors influencing it? International Journal of Organizational Behavior & Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1258-1265.Gardner, G. (2001). Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge. Qualitative research, 1(2), 185-204.Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2016). Teaching and learning through open-source educative processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 281-290.Graham-Clay, S. (2009, Spring). Communicating with parents: Strategies for teachers. School Community Journal, 15(1), 117-121.Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579.Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brothers Big Sisters school?based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346-361.Hoffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2016). Framing a phenomenological interview: What, why, and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 539-564.Husserl, E. (1999). The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. Indiana University Press.Katsirikou, A., & Lin, C. S. (2017). Revealing the “Essence” of things: Using phenomenology in LIS research. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2(4), 469-478.Kelley, M. L., White, T. D., Milletich, R. J., Hollis, B. F., Haislip, B. N., Heidt, E. K., & Henson, J. M. (2016). Youth emotional reactivity, interparental conflict, parent hostility, and worrying among children with substance-abusing parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 1024-1034.Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2017). Military children’s difficulty with reintegration after deployment: A relational turbulence model perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5), 542.Koon-Magnin, S., Bowers, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Arata, C. (2016). Social learning, self-control, gender, and variety of violent delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 824-836.Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008, September 20). Qualitative research: Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, 687–689. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035Lester, P., Aralis, H., Sinclair, M., Kiff, C., Lee, K. H., Mustillo, S., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2016). The impact of deployment on parental, family, and child adjustment in military families. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47(6), 938-949.Listwan, S. J. (2013). Introduction to juvenile justice. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint.Loprinzi, C. E., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D. R., & Sood, A. (2011). Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program to decrease stress and enhance resilience among breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Clinical breast cancer, 11(6), 364-368.MacDermid Wadsworth, S., Bailey, K. M., & Coppola, E. C. (2017). US military children and the wartime deployments of family members. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 23-28.Mahuro, G. M., & Hungi, N. (2016). Parental participation improves student academic achievement: A case of Iganga and Mayuge districts in Uganda. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264170.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Moeller, J. D., Culler, E. D., Hamilton, M. D., Aronson, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2015). The effects of military-connected parental absence on the behavioral and academic functioning of children: A literature review. Journal of Children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Services, 10(3), 291-306.Moll, L. (ed). (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge University Press.Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Sage Publications.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Neuman, W. L. (2008). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nicosia, N., Wong, E., Shier, V., Massachi, S., & Datar, A. (2017). Parental deployment, adolescent academic and social-behavioral maladjustment, and parental psychological well-being in military families. Public Health Reports, 132(1), 93-105.Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.Nunez J. C., Suarez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and learning, 10(3), 375-406.O’Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32.O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Neal, C. W., Mallette, J. K., & Mancini, J. A. (2018). The importance of parents\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' community connections for adolescent well?being: An examination of military families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1-2), 204-217.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Perkins-Gough, D. (2013). The significance of grit: A conversation with Angela Lee Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 71(1), 14-20.Perry, B. D. (2006). The boy who was raised as a dog and other stories from a child psychiatrist\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s notebook: What traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. New York, NY: Basic Books. Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146.Pexton, S., Farrants, J., & Yule, W. (2018). The impact of fathers’ military deployment on child adjustment. The support needs of primary school children and their families separated during active military service: A pilot study. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 23(1), 110-124.Powers, R. (2018). United States military installation profiles. Retrieved from http://usmilitary.about.com on 6 June 2019Project Implicit. (2018). Results. Retrieved from https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1 on 6 June 2019RAND Corporation. (2012). How do soldiers’ deployments affect children\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s academic performance and behavioral health? Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9651/index1.html on 6 June 2019Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the USArmy. American Psychologist, 66(1), 25.Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predict effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3).Roepke, A. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2016). Depression and prospection. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 23-48.Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 8(4), 509-516.Rule, P. & John, V.M. (2015). A necessary dialogue: Theory in case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(8), 1-11. Sandoz, E.K. & Moyer, D. N. (2015, October). Psychological flexibility as a framework for understanding and improving family reintegration following military deployment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(4), 495-499.Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333-335.Shankar, K., Hakken, D., & Østerlund, C. (2017). Rethinking artifacts. The handbook ofscience and technology studies, 59-85.Shriner, B & M. Shriner. (2014). Essentials of lifespan development: A topicalperspective. Bridgepoint Education: San Diego, CA.Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.Smith, P. L., & McSweeney, J. (2017). Organizational perspectives of nurse executives in 15 hospitals on the impact and effectiveness of rapid response teams. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 43(6), 289-298. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.01.006Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18.Stetson, R., Stetson, E., Sinclair, B. & Nix, K. (2012). Home visits: Teacher reflections about relationships, student behavior, and achievement. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 21-37.Tempski, P., Santos, I. S., Mayer, F. B., Enns, S. C., Perotta, B., Paro, H. B.,&Guimaraes, K. B. (2015). Relationship among medical student resilience, educational environment, and quality of life. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131535.Theron, L. C., Liebenberg, L. A., & Ungar, M. (2015). Youth resilience and culture.Springer Netherlands.Thompson, B. C., Mazer, J. P., & Flood Grady, E. (2015). The changing nature ofparent-teacher communication: Mode selection in the smartphone era. Communication Education, 64(2), 187-207.Tough, P. (2013). how children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Trier, K. A., Pappas, D., Bovitz, B., & Augustyn, M. (2018). Supporting development during military deployment and after. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(5), 447-449.Trautmann, J., Alhusen, J., & Gross, D. (2015). Impact of deployment on military families with young children: A systematic review. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 656-679.Trautman, J. & Ho, G. W. (2018, July). Parenting needs among mothers of young childrenduring military deployment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(4), 392.Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigatorsThe qualitative report, 15(3), 754-760.Turner, H. A., Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S., & Henly, M. (2017). Victimization and adversityamong children experiencing war-related parental absence or deployment in a nationally representative US sample. Child abuse & neglect, 67, 271-279.United States Department of Defense (n.d.). Educator’s guide to the military child during deployment. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/homefront/homefront.pdf on 6 June 2019VA. (2020). What is deployment. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/communityproviders/docs/deployment_operational_experiences.pdf Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in Oa positive psychology. American psychologist, 55(1), 89.Vijaya, Vijaya, & Rajeshkumar (2016). Parental involvement and academic achievement among high school students. Review of Research, 5(12), 11-14. Von Culin, K. R., Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306-312.Webster, D., & Rivers, N. (2018). Resisting resilience: Disrupting discourses of self-efficacy. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 1-13.Whyte, K. L., & Karabon, A. (2016). Transforming teacher-family relationships: Shifting roles and perceptions of home visits through the funds of knowledge approach. Early Years, 36(2), 207-221.Wright, K. B. & Shields, S.M. (2018, Spring/Summer). The effects of teacher home visits on student behavior, student academic achievement, and parent involvement. School Community Journal, 28(1), 67.Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152.Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Yüksel, P., & Y?ld?r?m, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271833455_Theoretical_Frameworks_Methods_and_Procedures_for_Conducting_Phenomenological_Studies_in_Educational_SettingsAPPENDIX A: LIBERTY UNIVERSITY IRB APPROVALWill includes once Submitted and Approved SEEKING VOLUNTEERS FOR A RESEARCH STUDYThe purpose of study: To explore the experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Participation Requirements:To participate in the study, you must currently be deployed or previously deployed within the past two years and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are enrolled in a school outside of the homeParticipation in this study involves:1. Face-to-Face interview or online interview with the researcher (approximately 45-60 minutes). Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.1. Online focus group with several other participants. The session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality1. Artifact for Analysis: Participants will be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.To find out more information about this study, please contact Eder Bennett at:Phone: (860) 213-4464Email: Study Title: Military Deployed Parents’ Perceptions Of Involvement In The Education Of Their Children While Deployed.Principal Investigator: Eder Bennett Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 Research Study: Perception of Involvement in Childs EducationContact: Eder BennettPhone: (860) 213-4464 APPENDIX B: RECRUITMENT FLYERAPPENDIX C: INFORMED CONSENTCONSENT FORMMILITARY DEPLOYED PARENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDYEder G. BennettLiberty UniversitySchool of EducationGeneral Overview of Study: You are invited to be in a research study investigating the perceptions of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. You were selected as a possible participant because you are currently deployed or previously deployed and have pre-K-12 school-aged children that are currently enrolled in school. Please read this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the study.Eder G. Bennett, a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Liberty University, is conducting this study.Background Information: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This will provide a foundation of understanding that can assist educational stakeholders and the military community in filling the void created by a deployed parent with the goal to help the student of the deployed parent.Procedures: If you consent to be a part of this study, you will be asked to do the following:1. Complete a questionnaire that includes preliminary demographic data, such as age, race, military affiliation, and years of service. The questionnaire will also consist of three open-ended questions and should take approximately 30 minutes to complete2. Participate in a face-to-face or online interview with the researcher. Interviews will be conducted in a predesignated location (chosen by you). Each interview will last for approximately 45-60 minutes. Interviews will be audio-recorded, but pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.3. Participate in an online focus group through which several prepared questions will be answered. Participants will be gathered in an online forum for 45-60 minutes using a videoconferencing software such as ZOOM. The online session will be recorded for transcription. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.4. Provide relevant artifacts for analysis: You will be asked to provide (if available) artifacts such as journals, letters, and email correspondence with teachers pertaining to your children. These artifacts will be analyzed to gain further insight into the issues that deployed parents face. Pseudonyms will be used to maintain confidentiality.Risks: The risks involved in this study are minimal and are no more than what participants encounter in everyday life. If you experience discomfort while taking part in this study, you may choose to stop participating at any time.Benefits: The direct benefits participants should expect to receive from taking part in this study will be understanding the perceptions of other deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. Though your participation may have potential benefits to education and the military community as a whole, you may not receive any direct benefits of your involvement. Compensation: Participants will not be compensated for participating in this study.Confidentiality: The records of this study will be kept private. In any sort of report, I might publish, I will not include any information that will make it possible to identify a subject. Research records will be stored securely, and only the researcher will have access to the artifacts. I may share the data I collect from you for use in future research studies or with other researchers; if I share the data that I collect about you, I will remove any information that could identify you, if applicable, before I share the data.1. Procedures will be taken to protect the privacy of all participants, including the use of assigned pseudonyms and interviews conducted in locations where others will not easily overhear the conversation.1. Data will be stored on a password-protected computer, and all documents will be kept in a locked file cabinet. Data may be used in future presentations.1. The researcher will transcribe interviews. Recordings will be stored on a password-locked computer for three years and then erased. Only the researcher will have access to these recordings.1. I cannot assure participants that other members of the online focus group will not share what was discussed with persons outside of the group.Voluntary Nature of the Study: Participation in this study is voluntary. Your decision whether or not to participate will not affect your current or future relations with Liberty University or your positions in the military. If you decide to participate, you are free not to answer any question or withdraw at any time without affecting those relationships.How to Withdraw from the Study: If you choose to withdraw from the study, please contact the researcher at the email address/phone number included in the next paragraph. Should you decide to withdraw, data collected from you, apart from focus group data, will be destroyed immediately and will not be included in this study. Focus group data will not be destroyed, but your contributions to the focus group will not be included in the study if you choose to withdraw.Contacts and Questions: The researcher conducting this study is Eder G. Bennett. You may ask any questions you have now. If you have questions later, you are encouraged to contact him at (860) 213-4464 or [email protected] you would like to address questions or concerns to someone other than the researcher, you are encouragedto contact the researcher’s faculty chair, Dr. James Eller, at (440) 319-1794 or [email protected] of Consent: I have read and understood the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. I consent to participate in the study. The researcher has my permission to audio-record me as part of my participation in this study.Signature of Participant Date Signature of Investigator DateAPPENDIX D: RECRUITMENT LETTERFall 2019Dear Service Member, As a graduate student in the School of Education at Liberty University, I am conducting research as part of the requirements for a doctoral degree in Educational Leadership. I am writing to invite you to participate in my research study about the perceptions of military parents who are deployed regarding their active involvement in their child’s education. You\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'re eligible to be in this study because you have been identified as having some experience with this particular issue. If you decide to participate in this study, you will partake in a face-to-face or online recorded interview, take part in an online focus group, and be asked to provide relevant artifacts (if available) for analysis. You should be able to complete your participation in approximately two to three weeks, with it taking four to five hours to complete all procedures. Your name and/or other identifying information will be requested as part of your participation, but the information will remain confidential.To participate, please respond to my email with your desire to be a possible participant. Following your response to participate, I will then contact you for an interview and provide the consent form for you to sign. The consent document contains additional information about my research.Sincerely,Eder G. BennettDoctoral CandidateLiberty UniversityAPPENDIX E: QUESTIONNAIREThe purpose of this qualitative transcendental phenomenological study is to explore the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education. This questionnaire is designed to obtain demographic information as well as to capture your perceptions and experiences of being a parent while deployed overseas in the military. 1. Name: ____________________________________________________________ 2. Age: _____________ 3. Ethnicity: ______________________ 4. Branch of Service: _____________________________________________ 5. Rank: __________________________________________________ 6. Age of spouse: ____________________________________________ 7. Spouse current profession: _______________________________________8. Highest degree earned ____________________________________________________ 9. How many school age children currently in your household: _______________________ 10. How many times have you been deployed: _____________________________________?11. If currently deployed, what is the duration of your deployment: ______________________12. If not currently deployed: When was your last deployment and how long________________13. Reflect on your experiences of being a parent while deployed in the military. Please provide a brief written response to each question.1. What word best describes your initial thought about deployment as it relates to your ability to be involved in your child’s education. Please explain 1. What support (familial, financial, experience) has aided in maintaining a sense of involvement in your child’s education1. What is the number one challenge (aside from a distance) that hinders your ability to participate in a child’s education? APPENDIX F: INTERVIEW GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Interview QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions 1. Please introduce yourself, describe yourself and your family 1. How long have you been serving in the military? 1. In the past two years, how many times and for how long where you deployed1. What is the age and gender of your school-age child or children? 1. Please explain your experience in the military thus far Questions relating to participants perceptions 1. What is your definition of parental involvement, particularly as it relates to education? 1. In what way (if any) does your definition of parental involvement change while deployed1. How would you compare and contrast your role in your child’s education when not deployed and while deployed? 1. What changes have you experienced in your child’s behavior, focus, and attitude towards learning while deployed?1. What are some ways or methods used to participate in your child’s education while deployed, and how do they differ from the technique used when not deployed?1. How has your deployment impacted your spouse, particularly as it relates to his/her ability to be involved in your child’s education 1. Reflect on the first time you spoke with your child about their education when you were deployed. What was that experience like? 1. Reflect on your child’s education. What is your perception of your child’s sense of how your deployment impacts his or her learning?Questions relating to participants’ perceptions of challenges1. Describe a time (while deployed) when you encountered a barrier or challenge that prevented you from being involved in their education? 1. Describe a time when you felt that you could be more involved in your children’s education while deployed. Were you able to come up with a solution? If so, please describe it. 1. How does being deployed alters your interactions with your child’s teachers and other educators 1. What stage of deployment (pre-deployment, deployment, post-deployment) do you believe creates the most challenges in attempting to stay involved in your child’s education, please explain. 1. What advice would you give a military parent who is deployed or may deploy in the futureAPPENDIX G: FOCUS GROUP QUESTION GUIDESemi-Structured, Open-Ended Focus Group QuestionsCentral Research Question: What are the perceptions and lived experiences of deployed military parents regarding active involvement in their child’s education?Opening Questions: 1. Will each individual, please state your name, your military branch, and length of serviceQuestions Relating to Challenges Parents experience while Deployed:1. As a parent, how would you describe your overall experience of being separated from your family while deployed1. What would you identify as the most challenging aspect of being a military deployed parent? 1. From a parental standpoint, what are some examples of challenges you encountered while deployed, and how have you overcome themQuestions Relating to Participants involvement:1. How has your deployment affected your child’s performance in school?1. How often and in what way do you interact with your child’s teachers or educator, what types of feedback have you received https://www.fhsdschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_995699/File/2015-16/Parents/Epstein%20-%20Six%20Keys.pdf
