A negative consequence, however, would be increased volatility in the value of the dollar. Imports would become more expensive as well, increasing inflation and potentially compelling the restructuring of the economy. Increased currency risk -- transaction and translation -- would also create difficulties for U.S. companies operating abroad. I do not support such a proposal. Attempts to jury-rig a global currency are as impractical as enforcing Esperanto as a global language. Such a currency would be inherently unstable, as the Euro example has shown us. The constituent communities would be committed to enforcing controls on each other in order to maintain the integrity of the currency. If at some point the currency of another economy overtakes that of the U.S., it will be because that economy is stronger, larger and more stable -- fundamental market forces -- rather than as the result of a political decision. 3. a) The Fed played a role in the crisis, by overstimulating the economy with low rates. The economy was showing signs of recovery but the Fed decided not to address the housing bubble. The Fed also raised rates too quickly to end the bubble, putting my mortgage holders in a position of being unable...
The Fed simply did not consider the microeconomic impacts of its actions, only the macroeconomic. Other authorities failed in their oversight of the banking industry, in particular with regards to risk levels and the use of complex financial instruments to mask that risk.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now