Communication and GroupThink
Do you agree with Hart's criticism that Janis' suggestions for avoiding Groupthink "inadvertently erode collegiality and foster group factionalism"? Do you think Hart's suggestions are preferable, or do they introduce other unintended negative consequences? Can the two sets of suggestions coexist?
Although Janis research on the phenomenon of groupthink has opened an entirely new field within group dynamics, the initial suggestions that he offered to groups to avoid such instances could certainly "inadvertently erode collegiality and foster group factionalism." Some level of group think is actually natural and health especially in regards to the cohesiveness of the group. However, Janis believes that the focus on vigilant decision making by a five step effort to create and follow objectives. However, over focusing on the groupthink issue can actually create an entire new set of problems and reduce the functionality...
Communication is a necessity for any relationship -- whether personal or professional; without communication there is not a relationship. Though communication is the basis of every relationship, there are good forms of communication as well as not-so-good forms of communication (which we are all probably very aware of). Good communication is imperative in the professional sphere because communication in the workplace is synonymous with information (Dainton & Zelley 2010, p.
The event is held yearly but has only limited opportunity for profit, as the venue, rather than direct ticket sales incur the cost of the events. In other words the venue is slightly different than the standard concert or tour experience, because the overall support of the whole event (the County Fair) offsets the costs incurred by the label and the artist's tour systems. The Label has been actively
The jury members listened and accepted what he said. When one person shows the other jury members that the knife is not so unique after all, they begin to realize there might be other things to reasonably doubt in the prosecution's case as well. This worked well in the story because the jury foreman didn't demand loyalty from the other jury members. He didn't any power over them. They wouldn't
One of the more controversial questions that arises when discussing group interactions is if one person need to lead the group, for the group to be effective (Lane, 2000, Decision mapping). In healthcare, some type of hierarchy is essential. Treatment decisions cannot be made through consensus alone, especially when a patient's life is in immediate danger. Also, seniority and areas of expertise are essential to define -- a more experienced
If this is present within a group of people, then their performance will be enhanced by their mutual support (both practical and moral)" (Blair 2008). Groups, and members of a group, must have strong interpersonal and managerial skills, to become self-managing units. A group must exercise collective leadership, not merely be lead by a single individual (Blair 2008). Even if one person may be designated as a leader, the group
Groupthink-No-More Guidelines for TeamsPromoting Diversity of PerspectivesGroupthink often stems from a lack of diverse perspectives within a team (Northagen, 2021). When everyone thinks alike or shares similar viewpoints, the team becomes susceptible to groupthink. To counter this, it is important to actively encourage the sharing of different opinions and perspectives (Dall'Acqua, 2021). This can be achieved by creating a team composition that is diverse in terms of expertise, experiences, and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now