Descartes -- Discourse on the Method
Rene Descartes was firmly rooted in the idea that all questions could be answered through mathematical or scientific means. His approach to constructing solutions, verifying knowledge, or establishing truths was methodical and based in the principles that had been established by others in relevant disciplines and were believed at the time to be reliable. He was the consummate introvert, believing that answers existed within and were achievable if he resolutely followed the methods he set out for himself.
Descartes' pursuit of the nature of truth and error -- indeed, the origin of truth and error -- began with his belief that people can come to a knowledge of things through their knowledge of God. He held the conviction that God is perfect and that a perfect being would find it impossible to be deceptive. Contrarily, Descartes was fully in tune with his own capacity for error; he believed that the place to start was to examine his own nature -- a nature that was capable of error.
This was the point at which I believed that Descartes would not be able to sustain his argument. The perfect-imperfect dichotomy seemed laden with reasoning pitfalls; add to that dichotomy the notion that a person can understand the nature of God through pure reasoning, and a recipe has been established for rational thought to overextend its capabilities. It seemed the ultimate hubris.
Below is the point in the discussion where my belief that Descartes' reasoning was going to derail follows. The issue, it seemed to...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now