Lincoln's Speech Compared
The Evolution of Lincoln's Thought in His Speeches
Abraham Lincoln is one of the most celebrated and popular Presidents in the history of the United States. Lincoln presided over the Presidency at a difficult time for the country, when the unity of the nation was at stake and the question of slavery deeply polarized the society into two. Lincoln was able to preserve the Union, but at a great cost which made him as controversial as he was popular. But it is uncontroversial among his contemporaries and the readers of his speeches today that the sixteenth President of the United States was a great orator, able to address a broad range of audience: rich and poor, literate and illiterate, freemen and slaves; and he possessed a rare skill of persuasion. Lincoln was able to address a divided nation with great care and measurement. He was reserved when he knew that his frankness could be damaging but he was also mercilessly candid when he thought that it was necessary. A careful reading of his classic speeches show that there are certain consistent trends that he followed throughout his pre-presidential and presidential careers, but his oratory tone also changed, moving from a greater emphasis on reason, intelligence, and the rule of law to a greater emphasis on God's judgment and the importance of morality.
Lincoln delivered one of his earliest political speeches at a Young Men's Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois, at the age of twenty eight. Lincoln was motivated by a mob incident involving a black man in St. Louis a few weeks before and his purpose was to make a persuasive speech, emphasizing the importance of the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution. Lincoln started his Lyceum Address by reminding the blessings of the American Independence and the glory of the Founding Fathers. This way of starting his speeches became a consistent trend that he usually followed afterwards. Lincoln reminded his audience of the sacrifices the Founders had made to make the American nation great and free, and with the passing of them all, the burden of continuing their legacy fell upon the shoulders of the new generation. Therefore, Lincoln placed so much emphasis on the dangers of mob rule and political apathy. Lincoln warned that a mob law would destroy the government, as the mob rejected the laws of the government, and the law-abiding citizens seeing the impotence of the government, would also distrust and hate it. Therefore, Lincoln argued, bad laws were better than no laws. Lincoln concluded the speech by calling his listeners to reason, intelligence, morality, "and in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws" (Lyceum Address, 1838).
Four years later, Lincoln delivered another important but also controversial speech. He addressed a crowd in the Second Presbyterian Church and decried religious fanaticism and the lawyers' vanity. Though the topic of his discussion was seemingly apolitical, Lincoln made several political suggestions through his denunciation of preachers and lawyers who pursued temperance with excessive passion and fanaticism. For Lincoln, preachers who kept denouncing and cursing intemperance acted against the nature of humanity, and thus against freedom, and thus against the principles upon which the United States was built. Preachers and lawyers often behaved like dictatorial agents, which Lincoln shunned and instead called for logic, reason, and persuasion as means to combat drunkenness. Instead of rejecting drunkards, Lincoln urged sympathy and understanding.
In his Temperance Address, Lincoln also began to express a poetic prose, quoting a theologian and logician Isaac Watts ("While the lamp holds out to burn / The vilest sinner may return"), and making a few references to Christianity. Poetry was important for Lincoln as it was not only a way of addressing the crowd but also guidance. Poetry, Lincoln believed, instilled morality and sound reasoning. He was an astute reader of Shakespeare and learned about the folly...
Another theorist with a different view is Chomsky (1988). Chomsky sees the acquisition of language as a process of input-output, what he calls a Cartesian view of language acquisition and language structure. He states: "We have an organism of which we know nothing. We know, or we can discover, what kind of data is available to it, and the first question we must try to answer is: what kind of
In Lincoln's view, the experiment could only succeed through the preservation of the Union without secession; he resolved to restore the rebellious states to the Union and all else would fall to this goal. But the war was very hard and very long, and war by its nature lowers the status of peripheral principles and elevates the central principles in dispute." (Kleinfeld, 1997) Lincoln provided the means for emancipation from
Companies such as XYZ Widget Corporation are well situated to take advantage of burgeoning markets in developing nations, particularly in Asia and Africa. 2. XYZ can grow its business by expanding its operations to certain developing nations in ways that profit the company as well as the impoverished regions that are involved, particularly when marketing efforts are coordinated with nongovernmental organizations operating in the region. 3. Several constraints and challenges must
" James a.S. McPeek further blames Jonson for this corruption: "No one can read this dainty song to Celia without feeling that Jonson is indecorous in putting it in the mouth of such a thoroughgoing scoundrel as Volpone." Shelburne asserts that the usual view of Jonson's use of the Catullan poem is distorted by an insufficient understanding of Catullus' carmina, which comes from critics' willingness to adhere to a conventional -- yet incorrect
Based on the foregoing considerations, it is suggested that the DCMP restructure their existing training programs and administration so that a more unified and centralized plan is in place, as well as providing for better instructor qualifications, evaluation, learning retention and more efficient and effective use of resources which are by definition scarce. These broad general issues were refined for the purposes of this study into the research questions stated
The line of legitimacy, separating socially approvable use of force from violence, cannot be effectively drawn without an agreement on what constitutes the optimum amount of force necessary to maintain social order and to protect human rights against encroachment. A society subscribing to infinite morality which condemns all use of force as immoral is doomed no less than a society accepting the absolute pragmatism of tyrants. " As Oleg Zinam
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now