¶ … SWOT
The BCG index was designed to help managers determine how departments were performing in their company (NetMBA, 2002). The matrix is a simple calculation that labels the departments as a star, question mark, cash cow or dog. These designations have specific meanings as to the market position and cash flow. The company in question has had two departments analyzed using the BCG matrix. The question is to the efficacy of this analysis.
The two quadrants that the analysis came up with were those for the question mark (upper right) and the other is in the cash cow quadrant (lower left). The electronics department was rated as the question mark and the appliance division was a cash cow. The findings suggest, according to the BCG chart, that electronics is a department that consumes a lot of cash because it is growing rapidly, but it has small market share. This means that the electronics could gain market share and eventually become a real money maker, but it could also continue to absorb cash and never gain market share which would cost the company money with no return. The appliance department is a cash cow because it is in a slow growing market and generates a lot of cash for the company.
It seems that the company should use the appliance department to fund the electronics department until market growth slows in electronics. This may be risky because electronics has been a volatile market for a long time, but it is possible to see where the trend heads over a two to five-year time period. The company could also use a McKinsey or a COPE analysis to further analyze the departments to support the BCG findings.
This type of analysis does have some problems because of its narrow focus, but it is a good starting point. The efficacy of the approach is that it should only be used with supporting evidence. This analysis does show the approximate cash flow of the two departments.
Part Two
Apple, Inc. is one of the most successful companies in the world. It has gotten this way because the managers of the company have maximized what they consider to be strengths and minimized the company's weaknesses. As with any company, both exist, but it is the management of what is known as a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis by both the company itself and its competitors that determines its overall usefulness. Conducting a SWOT analysis of Apple, Inc. will help to determine what weaknesses exist at Apple that can be exploited.
Apple has many strengths which have allowed it to become so successful. Apple generously funds its research and development department because that has been the primary strength of the company. R & D. is important for any company, but for a major electronics manufacturer it is crucial so that the company can build new business. Another strength that the company has is that it has a strong hold on customers that it has developed for its computer products. With Apple, computers were the original products that were sold. Apple has a very loyal following because it has consistently produced a product that is superior to other personal computers. Maintaining this portion of the business is important because it acts as a base for all the other products that Apple tries to introduce. A third strength can be seen in the fact that Apple has built a brand that is one of the most successful in the world. The importance of branding cannot be understated. Apple maintains its brand by developing innovative and superior products that further build the brand. The reason this is probably Apple's greatest strength is that the company can sell a great deal of product based on its name alone. Apple also has diversified successfully into other markets. It is not enough to have a single product; Apple realized that they needed to enter...
BCG Matrix According to the BCG Matrix, the electronics category is a question mark characterized by low market share, but potential high growth. In this instance, a decision must be made to invest heavily, sell off or invest nothing and generate whatever cash is possible (BCG Matrix). Appliances, on the other hand, are cash cows enjoying high market share, but little growth. Because growth is low, investments should be kept to
BCG Matrix Strategic Management The BCG Matrix: An overview and a hypothetical situation The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is an efficient way to visually represent a company's portfolio of goods and services, and provides a way for organizations to evaluate their strategic possibilities. The BCG Matrix classifies a company according to three primary business interests or units (BCG Matrix, 2012, Net MBA). The Matrix is represented in the form of four quadrants:
BCG Matrix, an analytic tool designed and named for the Boston Consulting Group, provides insight into corporate strategy regarding a company's operating units and products. The focus of the matrix is on "market growth and market share of the organization's product portfolio relative to their largest competitor" (NetMBA.com. N.D. PP. 1). Companies should according to the matrix, allocate capital to portfolio investments which are in a fast growing market that
Items such as the potential partner's track record for development efficiency was a definite strength. In contrast, one weakness was the sharing of profits once the product went to market, as well as the fact that our company would not have sole ownership of the product. There was the opportunity to bring the product to market ahead of any potential competitors, plus the opportunity to develop a relationship that
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Business Management: SWOT, BCG and I.R. Matrices AnalysisWhen the company has stepped into the market and is ready to deliver its products or services to the market consumers, it engages itself in evolving. For this purpose, it has to develop strategies that are favorable for its company continually. The strategies are based on the unceasingly changing external factors such as market risk, legal considerations, technological changes, competition, consumer
3. Limitation of individual model - synergies obtained by combining strategic analyses models All analysis models presented in the previous chapter represent useful but not exhaustive methods of deciding the future of a company or its products. As there is no perfect model, the joint usage of them might bring most value to the company. Ansoff analysis generally assumes that diversification will bring higher returns when higher levels of risks are undertaken (diversifying
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now