Performance Appraisals When Choosing To Research Proposal

I would want to be evaluated through a form that would reveal whether or not I was conducting my assigned duties. Because of its specific nature, figure 11-3 would not only allow the evaluating manager to make an informed representation of my work, but also remind me of specific duties. Thus, as an employer and an employee, figure 11-3 is the superior form. It allows for the accurate and succinct evaluation of workers and the best chance of convincing those workers to continue to strive or make up for what they have lost. Question Two

When looking at the performance appraisals in figures 11-1 and 11-3, employers can find many factors on which to evaluate them. The first, job-relatedness, has already been discussed above, noting that the second form was superior in this area. While it may not have been nearly as job-related, the first form was probably less expensive. Indeed, it could almost be a general form, copied off the Internet instead of developed by the organization itself. Figure 11-3, then, is far more superior in this regard; it relates specifically to the job in question, although its specificity as probably paid for in money and time to complete. Both forms seem to be relatively...

...

It is this form, however, that could be best used in teaching and counseling employees, as it is very descriptive regarding what is required of them. Figure 11-1 is not, and would probably be of little help when counseling employees as the abstract terms without job ties may be difficult to understand. Furthermore, because of the rater bias that can be easily applied in form 11-1, form 11-3 is the best one to use when deciding employee pay raises and censures. Finally, form 11-3 is also the most accurate form for providing specific feedback and measuring employee success accurately. In this form, employers can point to the specific examples regarding where employees are falling short and can recommend further action. Form 11-1 only allows managers to point to concepts and goals that the employee may not be achieving. Because the form is so general, it would be difficult for the employee and the employer to get much use out of it. Thus, while it may be figure 11-1 that is the simplest to understand, figure 11-3 is a performance-based piece of evaluation equipment that would benefit most employers.

Cite this Document:

"Performance Appraisals When Choosing To" (2009, February 16) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-appraisals-when-choosing-to-24764

"Performance Appraisals When Choosing To" 16 February 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-appraisals-when-choosing-to-24764>

"Performance Appraisals When Choosing To", 16 February 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-appraisals-when-choosing-to-24764

Related Documents
Performance Appraisals
PAGES 2 WORDS 546

Performance Appraisals Describe two different performance appraisal methods. There are many types of performance appraisal method. Some of them are job results/outcome; essay method; ranking; forced distribution; graphic rating scale; behavioral checklist; behavioral anchored rating scales (BARS); and management by objectives. Two other performance appraisal methods are the following: The manager can document performance objectives and process in a journal. This can be one way for evaluation and appraisal of performance Supporters of this approach

Job Analysis and Performance Appraisal Methods: Practical Applications My current circumstances could be grooming me for a totally different profession but deep inside, I have always admired the work journalists do. I particularly like how news reporters go out to the field, gather real time information, and interact with newsmakers. In addition to enjoying themselves, these ladies and gentlemen play a very significant role in the creation of a more open

The other major advantage of the use of a pilot group for conducting evaluations and 360 degree feedback survey is it enables pilot participants to act as champions who promote the process in the rest of the organization. Using Rater Groups: When conducting evaluations and 360 degree feedback assessments, using small but relevant rater groups is one of the best methods. The consideration of the number of people to participate in

Performance Management Systems The Paradox of Performance Management Systems And Their Effect on Corporate Performance Performance Management Systems including annual performance reviews are only as effective as the contextual relevance and insight of a manager or leader into how to create greater alignment of personal and professional goals of an employee. The continued evolution of performance management systems provide a useful index of how management and leadership theories have progressed beyond obvious measures

Managers and Performance Evaluation The fact that so many managers dislike performance evaluation is as old and common as human nature itself. Performance evaluation is so disliked by so many because it requires that one take a long and hard look at oneself and engage in the process of problem-solving and making changes. Finding solutions and making changes are two of the most difficult challenges to face human beings because it

Contrary to popular belief, improved performance by employees in a particular organization is not always linked to incentives; in today's dynamic business environment, it is crucial for human resource managers to balance the needs of individuals with those of the organization. One critical component that leads to good individual as well as organizational performance is the application of an effective performance management process. In fact, companies that invest in good