Moreover, if un-affordability and budgetary limits exclude traditional procurement, the project will not progress. This is the case when the submitted bids do not reflect value for money and there is no delivery. This situation and the strong desire to deliver may indicate an inclination to bias the PSC to make PPP represent value for money (OECD). # BIBLIOGRAPHY

DFPNI. OBC and FBC Requirements. Northern Ireland Guide to Expenditure Appraisal

and Evaluation: Department of Finance and Personnel, 2010. Retrieved on January 19,

2012 from http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/index/finance/eap-ppp/eag_obc_OBCandFBCRequirements.htm

Leigland, J. Is the Public Sector Right for Developing Countries? Gridlines number 8,

PPIAF, Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, 2008. Retrieved on January 17,

2012 from http://www.info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/240061/1STHEO~1.PDF

Public-Private Partnerships Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2008.
Pangeran, M.H. And Wirahadikusumah R.D. Challenges in Public Sector Comparator

for Bid Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership's Infrastructure. MICCE: First

Makassar International Conference on Civil Engineering, 2010. Retrieved on January

17, 2012 from http://www.ftsl.itb.ac.id/kd/manajemen_dan_rehayasa_konstruksi/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/rdw-micce.pdf

Partnerships Victoria. Public Sector Comparator. PSC Supplementary Technical Note,

2001

-. Identifying and Valuing Risk

- Introduction

PPP. Public Sector Comparator Policy Department of Treasury: Government of Western

Australia, 2011