Andrew Carnegie The 'Richest Man Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
2217
Cite

It must be remembered that Andrew Carnegie had a strong belief in the meritocracy of the United States of America, and also that his free libraries would be of immense benefit to the immigrants, like himself, who were arriving in America at that time. (De-constructing the Philanthropic library, the Sociological Reasons behind Andrew Carnegie's Millions to Libraries) However, Andrew Carnegie is primarily remembered for two main reasons or achievements, without which the United States of America would not have been the America that it is today; one being that he managed to make enormous amounts of money as a successful businessman and an industrialist, and secondly, he managed to give most of the money that he had made, away to charity. By the time he was twenty four years old, Andrew Carnegie was earning about $1,500 per year, which in today's world would amount to $200,000 per year, and this amount was merely his salary, and he was earning more money form his investments as well, one of his very first investments being in George Pullman's Company, the company which was making the first railroad sleeping cars. It was from these dividends that Andrew Carnegie was able to buy oil producing property, and later, during the 1870's, when almost all the steel being used in America was arriving from Great Britain, he launched his own steel company, in Braddock, Pennsylvania, which by the year 1881, was producing double as Britain's largest steel company would be able to produce. (Carnegie Institution, New Horizons for Science)

It is worth noting that from his very early years, Andrew Carnegie was aware of the fact that the world of business was not the only world that existed, and when he was thirty years old, he is supposed to have written a memo to himself, that he would further his education in Oxford. This showed that he believed that one must acquire knowledge and be well aware of things other than one's own business. When he wrote his 'Gospel of Wealth', he was able to tell the world that he believed in charity more than in anything else, and he has stated within the work, his thoughts on charity. First and foremost, he...

...

Thirdly, one must make sure that the money that has been given is being utilized properly. It was Andrew Carnegie's strong contention that giving away one's wealth for the common good was as important as making the wealth in the first place; and the giving away must be done personally and it must also be done in the right manner. Perhaps America would have been a different place if Andrew Carnegie had not arrived and set up his immensely successful steel business in Pittsburgh, and if he had not believed in charity and in furthering the cause of education. (Carnegie Institution, New Horizons for Science)
However, there is no doubt that he cast a major influence on several aspects of life in the United States at that time, and he still does, even today, in the form of his Public Libraries and charitable trusts that he has left behind him.

Cite this Document:

"Andrew Carnegie The 'Richest Man" (2005, October 24) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/andrew-carnegie-the-richest-man-69596

"Andrew Carnegie The 'Richest Man" 24 October 2005. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/andrew-carnegie-the-richest-man-69596>

"Andrew Carnegie The 'Richest Man", 24 October 2005, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/andrew-carnegie-the-richest-man-69596

Related Documents

Carnegie Andrew Carnegie: Robber Baron or Captain of Industry? Harold Livesay's biography of Andrew Carnegie portrays a man that can be called at once both a Robber Baron and a Captain of Industry. This paper will attempt to show how each title applied to Carnegie in his lifetime and how, in fact, the two titles (far from being dissimilar) may actually be considered synonymous. Andrew Carnegie's humble beginnings do not necessarily qualify him

His legacy lives on through his foundation, and most especially the structures he endowed upon his fellow man. REFERENCES Carnegie, A. And Gordon Hunter. The Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie and The Gospel of Wealth. Signet, 2006. Garrison, L.D. Apostles of Culture: Public Librarian and American Society. University of Wisconsin Press, 2003. Koch, T.W. A Book of Carnegie Libraries. BiblioBazaar, 2009. Lorenzen, M. "Deconstructing the Carnegie Libraries: The Sociological Reasons Behind Carnegie's Millions to Public Libraries." Illinois

Role of Andrew Carnegie Andrew Camegie Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business Was Andrew Carnegie a "Robber Baron" or a "Captain of Industry"? Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish American born on 25th November 1835. He was an ordinary person but then he succeeded in becoming an entrepreneur, industrialist and a businessman who made a great contribution towards the expansion of American steel industry in the late 19th century. The book, "Andrew Carnegie and

(Spencer, 1857) In contrast and in comparison the writings of Andrew Carnegie also lend to the idea of the apologist, as if his luck and ingenuity give him a special place in the world of men, and therefore he has contributed to the greater good. Carnegie, stresses that the differences between the rich and the common are necessary as the greatest will rise to the top and from this lofty

Andrew Carnegie�s Gospel of WealthFrom the onset, it would be prudent to note that �The Gospel of Wealth� happens to be one of the most profound writings of the 19th Century. This is more so the case owing to the timeless relevance of the subject matter. However, before delving deeper into this great piece of writing, it would be prudent to first familiarize ourselves with Andrew Carnegie, the author of

rise of business and the new age of industrial capitalism forced Americans to think about, criticize, and justify the new order -- especially the vast disparities of wealth and power it created. This assignment asks you to consider the nature and meaning of wealth, poverty and inequality in the Gilded Age making use of the perspectives of four people who occupied very different places in the social and intellectual